166
E. Ota et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 164–167
Figure 3. Inhibition of iNOS expression by synthetic probes 4 and 6. Cells were incubated with or without indicated chemicals for 2 h, thereafter stimulated 1 lg/ml LPS for
24 h. Total cell lysates were subjected by Western blotting.
NO production. As expected, the length of the alkyl chain and the
thioester moiety were crucial factors for the inhibitory effect. In
contrast, the biotinylated probe 4 and the photoaffinity probe 6
inhibited NO production with low toxicity (ED50 > 30); their IC50
showed a different mode of action from that of 1. Biotinylated
probe 4 and photoaffinity probe 6 were potent inhibitors of LPS-in-
duced NO production, and will be available to search for the target
molecule of DTCM-glutarimide. Further investigations are cur-
rently underway in our laboratory.
values were 5 and 4.5 lg/mL, respectively, comparable to that of
2. On the basis of their activities against NO production, the probes
4 and 6 were evaluated by LPS-induced iNOS expression in RAW
264.7 cells. In Figure 3, the probes inhibited LPS-induced iNOS
expression. These results indicated that alterations of NO produc-
tion were caused by that of iNOS expression, and the effective
probes 4 and 6 were not NO scavengers or influential factors to
absorbance spectrum, but genuine inhibitors against signaling
pathways induced by LPS stimulation. In addition, though quite a
few biotinylated probes and photoaffinity probes extremely de-
crease their inhibitory activity within cells compared to original
inhibitors, our synthetic probes 4 and 6 exhibited respectable po-
tential against LPS-induced iNOS expression. Subsequently, 4 and
6 were submitted to electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)
to confirm the same action as that of 2. As expected (Fig. 4), 4
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported in part by a High-Tech Re-
search Center Project for Private Universities: matching fund sub-
sidy from MEXT, 2006–2011, and by the Science Research
Promotion Fund from the Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation
for Private School of Japan from MEXT.
References and notes
1. Hayden, M. S.; Ghosh, S. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 2195.
2. Pahl, H. Oncogene 1999, 18, 6853.
3. Dixit, V.; Mak, T. W. Cell 2002, 111, 615.
4. Saito, N.; Kitame, F.; Kikuchi, M.; Ishida, N. J. Antibiot. 1974, 27, 206.
5. Wang, Z.; Igarashi, M.; Ikeda, Y.; Horie, R.; Umezawa, K. Heterocycles 2006, 69,
377.
6. Ishikawa, Y.; Tachibana, M.; Matsui, C.; Obata, R.; Umezawa, K.; Nishiyama, S.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 1726.
and 6 did not inhibit NF-j
B induced by LPS as in the case of 2.7
From these results, synthetic probes will be utilized as powerful
tools for activity-based protein profiling in future studies.
In conclusion, we have designed and synthesized biologically
active probes to elucidate the inhibitory mechanism of 2, which
7. Takeiri, M.; Tachibana, M.; Kaneda, A.; Ito, A.; Ishikawa, Y.; Nishiyama, S.; Goto,
R.; Yamashita, K.; Shibasaki, S.; Hirokata, G.; Ozaki, M.; Todo, S.; Umezawa, K.
Inflammation Res. 2011, 60, 879.
8. Wilchek, M.; Bayer, E. A. Anal. Biochem. 1988, 171, 1.
9. Sin, N.; Meng, L.; Wang, M. Q. W.; Wen, J. J.; Bornmann, W. G.; Crews, C. M. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 6099.
10. Hua, S.; Inesi, G. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 11865.
11. Ruggles, E. L.; Deker, P. B.; Hondal, R. J. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 1257.
12. Kottani, R.; Valiulin, R. A.; Kutateladze, A. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006,
103, 13917.
13. Egawa, Y.; Suzuki, M.; Okuda, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1963, 11, 589.
14. Gupta, K. A.; Saxena, A. K.; Jain, P. C.; Anand, N. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B 1987, 26,
341.
15. Usuki, Y.; Matsumoto, K.; Inoue, T.; Yoshioka, K.; Iioa, H.; Tanaka, T. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 1553.
16. Suzuki, T.; Hisakawa, S.; Itoh, Y.; Suzuki, N.; Takahashi, K.; Kawahata, M.;
Yamaguchi, K.; Nakagawa, H.; Miyata, N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17,
4208.
17. Kim, K. I.; Lee, J. W.; Ito, Y.; Kang, J. H.; Song, K. S.; Jang, E. C.; Son, T. I. J. Appl.
Polym. Sci. 2010, 117, 3029.
18. In order to prevent photolysis, the benzoate 6 was purified in a darkroom.
19. Morrell, A.; Placzek, M. S.; Steffen, J. D.; Antony, S.; Agama, K.; Pommier, Y.;
Cushman, M. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 2040.
20. Spectroscopic data for 3: IR (KBr)
m 3282, 3080, 2926, 2858, 1697, 1645,
1265 cmÀ1 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) d 1.44 (2H, m), 1.62 (4H, m), 2.19 (2H,
;
t, J = 7.3 Hz), 2.38 (2H, m), 2.70 (5H, m), 2.71 (1H, d, J = 12.7 Hz), 2.92 (1H, dd,
J = 4.9,12.7 Hz), 3.06 (2H, br t, J = 6.3 Hz), 3.21 (1H, ddd, J = 4.4, 5.6, 8.8 Hz), 3.36
(1H, t, J = 6.3 Hz), 3.37 (1H, t, J = 6.8 Hz), 4.31 (1H, dd, J = 4.4, 7.8 Hz), 4.48 (1H,
ddd, J = 1.0, 4.9, 7.8 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD) d 26.8, 29.1, 29.51, 29.55,
29.8, 36.8, 37.8, 39.8, 41.1, 57.0, 61.6, 63.4, 166.1, 174.7, 176.2, 198.3. HRMS
(FAB) calcd for
Spectroscopic data for 4: IR (KBr)
1265 cmÀ1 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 1.22–1.78 (26H, m), 2.19 (1H, t,
C
19H29N4O5S2 [M+H]+: 457.1579. Found: m/z 457.1571.
m
3308, 2922, 2851, 1686, 1632,
;
J = 6.9 Hz), 2.20 (1H, t, J = 7.4 Hz), 2.36 (2H,m), 2.63 (2H, br d, J = 6.5 Hz), 2.74
(1H, d, J = 12.5 Hz), 2.75 (2H, m, overlapped with 1H signal), 2.90 (2H, br t,
J = 7.4 Hz), 2.93 (1H, dd, J = 5.2, 12.5 Hz), 3.17 (1H, ddd, J = 4.7, 7.0, 7.8 Hz), 3.23
(1H, t, J = 6.5 Hz), 3.24 (1H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 4.33 (1H, m), 4.52 (1H, m), 4.98 (1H, s),
5.59 (1H, s), 5.63 (1H, s), 8.64 (1H, s); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) d 25.4,
Figure 4. Effects of probes 4 and 6 on NF-
were treated with or without indicated chemicals for 2 h, and thereafter stimulated
g/ml LPS for 30 min. The nuclear proteins were then extracted and used for
EMSA.
jB activation in RAW264.7 cells. Cells
1
l