H.A. Stefani et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 47 (2012) 52e58
57
Table 4
Amino acid hydrophobicities.
For the studied ligands the most hydrophilic moiety is proline,
so it would be expected that, as this part of the ligand is exposed to
the solvent, it should be the most active, moreover, the lowest
activity should be expected for valine, which is the most hydro-
phobic. As this is precisely what was observed in the inhibition
experiment, it can be rationalized that, in this case, inhibition
capacity was related to the part of the ligand that was outside the
active site, thus, exposed to the solvent.
Amino Acid
Hydropathy index
(highly hydrophilic)
Proline
ꢁ1.6
Cysteine
Phenylalanine
Valine
2.5
2.8
4.2
(highly hydrophobic)
4. Conclusion
compound markedly reduced LPS-induced PG2 secretion, which
may indicate a selective action on COX-2 activity. The effect of
proline-substituted on COX-2 activity was corroborated using
COX inhibitors screening assay [23,24]. As shown in Fig. 3, only
proline-substituted compound exhibited the same inhibitory
potency of celecoxib on COX-2 activity. Although, valine or
cistein-substituted compounds did not affect PGE2 levels on LPS-
stimulated neutrophils supernatant, their direct incubation with
the enzymes inhibited COX-2 action. The activities were lower
than those found in proline-substituted compound and celecoxib.
This difference on obtained data may be due experimental
conditions, involving different biological systems. While, PGE2
levels were quantified in cultured cells, which depend on cell
metabolism, COX activity was measured directly on enzyme
system, without cell participation. No significant inhibition on
COX-1 activity was detected in all of compounds studied. As
previously reported, the adverse effects of COX inhibitors are
mainly linked to inhibition of the production of COX-1 generated
products, which exert physiological actions [1].
We described herein the synthesis of a novel 2,5-diarylfuran
scaffold and its conjugation with different amino acids (3-AFA).
We showed that the proline-substituted compound inhibited PGE2
secretion by LPS-stimulated neutrophils and inhibited COX-2
activity similarly to celecoxib, showing selectivity for COX-2
activity.
The analysis of docking results allowed us to postulate that the
inhibition activity of the studied compounds was modulated by the
hydrophilicity of the amino acid that was attached to them.
Finally, we expect that these results will contribute to the
development of newer anti-inflammatory molecules with fewer
adverse side effects.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Brazilian Agencies FAPESP (07/59404-2 to H.A.S.),
CNPq (300613/2007 to H. A. S., 306532/2009-3 to J. Z.-S., 308116/
2010-0 to I.C.) and CAPES (Rede Nanobiotec-Brasil 808/2009 to J. Z.-
S. and I. C.) for financial support.
3.3. Docking studies
Appendix. Supplementary data
In order to rationalize the different biological results shown in
Fig. 2, molecular docking studies of the S and R-enantiomers for
compounds with Pro, Cys, Phe and Val, modeled with MarvinSketch
[25], and celecoxib were performed. The GOLD program (version
4.1.1) with GOLDScore was used [26e28]. The obtained GOLDScores
and corresponding binding energies are shown in Table 2.
The docking studies showed that, in all cases, the common part
of the molecules, namely the 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-phenylfuran
moiety, fits in the long narrow hydrophobic channel of the COX-2
active site in the same fashion, whether the substituent amino
acids are positioned at the entrance of the channel that opens to the
active site, thus this entrance is in some instance “closed” by the
amino acid moiety which is, then, exposed to the solvent (Fig. 3a).
In Fig. 3b it is shown the superposition of the ligand SC-558, as it is
in the X-ray crystal structure [7] (PDB code: 1CX2 [29]) to the
docking results of celecoxib and the Pro compound, as represen-
tative of the poses of the compounds studied here. It can be seen
Supplementary data related to this article can be found online at
References
[1] W.L. Smith, R. Langenbach, Why there are two cyclooxygenase isozymes,
J. Clin. Invest. 107 (2001) 1491e1495.
[2] C.A. Dinarello, Anti-inflammatory agents: present and future, Cell 140 (2010)
935e950.
[3] C. Sostres, C.J. Gargallo, M.T. Arroyo, A. Lanas, Adverse effects of non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, aspirin and coxibs) on upper gastrointes-
tinal tract, Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 24 (2010) 121e132.
[4] G.A. FitzGerald, C. Patrono, The coxibs, selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-
2, N. Engl. J. Med. 345 (2001) 433e442.
[5] P. Singh, A. Mittal, K. Satwiderjeet, W. Holzer, S. Kumar, 2,3-Diaryl-5-
ethylsulfanylmethyltetrahydrofurans as a new class of COX-2 inhibitors and
cytotoxic agents, Org. Biomol. Chem. 6 (2008) 2706e2712.
[6] M. Biava, G.C. Porretta, G. Poce, C. Battilocchio, F. Manetti, M. Botta, S. Forli,
L. Sautebin, A. Rossi, C. Pergola, C. Ghelardini, N. Galeotti, F. Makovec,
A. Giordani, P. Anzellotti, P. Patrignani, M. Anzini, Novel ester and acid
derivatives of the 1,5-diarylpyrrole scaffold as anti-inflammatory and anal-
gesic agents. Synthesis and in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, J. Med.
Chem. 53 (2010) 723e733.
[7] R.G. Kurumbail, A.M. Stevens, J.K. Gierse, J.J. McDonald, R.A. Stegeman, J.P. Pak,
D. Gildehaus, J.M. Miyashiro, T.D. Penning, K. Seibert, P.C. Isakson,
W.C. Stallings, Structural basis for selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 by
anti-inflammatory agents, Nature 384 (1996) 644e648.
[8] C.E. Stephens, F. Tanious, S. Kim, W.D. Wilson, W.A. Schell, J.R. Perfect,
S.G. Franzblau, D.W. Boykin, Diguanidino and "reversed" diamidino
2,5-diarylfurans as antimicrobial agents, J. Med. Chem. 44 (2001) 1741e1748.
[9] P. Vachal, L.M. Toth, General facile synthesis of 2,5-diarylheteropentalenes,
Tetrahedron Lett. 45 (2004) 7157e7161.
that there is
a good overlap between the moieties of the
compounds that are located in the active site. The main interactions
of the Pro-ligand are collated in Table 3. Fig. 4 shows that, along
with the interactions described in Table 3, there are several CeH.
p
interactions, involving the phenyl ring attached to the methoxy
group with Ser353, the furan ring making two different interactions
with Ser353 and an O/p with Leu352, and the other phenyl ring
with Ala516. Fig. 5
These results indicate that the different activities could not be
attributed to the interactions of the compounds in the active site,
but is more likely a consequence of the part of the ligand that is
exposed to the solvent. Since these amino acids have different
hydrophobicity we decided to use the Kyte & Doolittle hydrophaty
index (Table 4), with values ranging from ꢁ4.5 (hydrophilic) to 4.5
(hydrophobic) [31], in order to find a correlation.
[10] V. Amarnath, K. Armanath, Intermediates in the PaaleKnorr synthesis of
furans, J. Org. Chem. 60 (1995) 301e307.
[11] F. Barba, M.D. Velasco, A. Guirado, Synthesis of 2,5-diarylfurans from phenacyl
bromides, Synthesis (1984) 593e595.
[12] H.S.P. Rao, S. Jothlingam, Facile microwave-mediated transformations of
2-butene-1,4-diones and 2-butyne-1,4-diones to furan derivatives, J. Org.
Chem. 68 (2003) 5392e5394.