982
R. Tan, D. Song / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 980–982
the reaction mixture. Bulkier phosphine ligands might be required
in the reaction in order to obtain the desired product.
In summary, we have prepared a series of tetraquinolinyl
substituted compounds which could potentially serve as binucleat-
ing ligands. With the possibility of introducing the substitutes on
the quinolinyl arms, the solubility as well as the steric and elec-
tronic properties of these ligands could be tuned accordingly.
Complexation of these ligands is currently under investigation in
our laboratories.
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by grants to D.S. from the Natural
Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada, the
Canadian Foundation for Innovation, the Ontario Research Fund,
and the ERA program of Ontario. R.T. is grateful for a postgraduate
scholarship from the OGS program of Ontario.
Figure 1. POV-Ray plots of molecular structures of 1a (left), 2a (middle), and 3a
(right). All the hydrogen atoms (except for the olefinic ones in 3a) are omitted for
clarity.
Previously, we observed a hindered rotation behavior in the ttqb
compounds, which caused line-broadening in the 1H NMR spectra
at room temperature.12 Interestingly, no hindered rotation was
observed in 1a although one might expect a relatively large rota-
tion energy barrier because of the presence of tert-butyl groups.
Only one set of sharp quinolinyl and tert-butyl resonances was ob-
served, suggesting fast rotations in solution. In contrast, the 1H
NMR spectra of 2a and 3a showed several broad peaks at ambient
temperature in the aromatic region, while heating the sample to
50 °C sharpened the resonance peaks, suggesting a similar hin-
dered rotation as displayed by ttqb. The prominent molecular ion
peaks of these three compounds in ESI-MS spectra provided strong
evidence for the formation of the desired tetraquinolinyl substi-
tuted compounds. To further prove the identity of these highly
complex species, the solid state structures of 1a–3a were unambig-
uously revealed by X-ray crystallography and shown in Figure 1.
All of them are the desired tetrasubstituted compounds. Each mol-
ecule of compound 1a has a crystallographically imposed twofold
symmetry. The quinolinyl groups are nearly perpendicular to the
pyrene ring with a dihedral angle of ꢀ72° and the two nitrogen
atoms from the adjacent quinolinyl groups are situated on the
opposite sides of the pyrene ring to minimize steric repulsion. Each
molecule of compounds 2a and 3a has a crystallographically
imposed inversion center. The two adjacent quinolinyl groups in
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (crystallographic data (excluding structure
factors) for the structures in this paper have been deposited with
the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary
publication (CCDC 849009-849011). Copies of the data can be
obtained, free of charge, on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road,
Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK, (fax: +44-(0)1223-336033 or e-mail:
deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.Uk)) associated with this article can be found,
References and notes
1. Aguila, D.; Escribano, E.; Speed, S.; Talancon, D.; Yerman, L.; Alvarez, S. Dalton
Trans. 2009, 6610–6625.
2. Kuzu, I.; Krummenacher, I.; Meyer, J.; Armbruster, F.; Breher, F. Dalton Trans.
2008, 5836–5865.
3. Hierso, J.; Smaliy, R.; Amardeil, R.; Meunier, P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1754–
1769.
4. Vila, J. M.; Pereira, M. T.; Suarez, A.; Fernandez, J. J.; Ortigueira, J. M.; Fernandez,
A.; Torres, M. L.; Rodriguez, C. Trends Organomet. Chem. 1999, 3, 71–98.
5. Chandrasekhar, V.; Murugesapandian, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1047–1062.
6. Lang, H.; Packheiser, R.; Walfort, B. Organometallics 2006, 25, 1836–1850.
7. Maggini, S. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2009, 253, 1793–1832.
8. Rosenthal, J.; Nocera, D. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 543–553.
9. Kim, E.; Chufan, E. E.; Kamaraj, K.; Karlin, K. D. Chem. Rev. (Washington, DC, US)
2004, 104, 1077–1133.
10. Belle, C.; Pierre, J. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 4137–4146.
11. Gavrilova, A. L.; Bosnich, B. Chem. Rev. (Washington, DC, US) 2004, 104, 349–
383.
12. Tan, R.; Jia, P.; Rao, Y.; Jia, W.; Hadzovic, A.; Yu, Q.; Li, X.; Song, D.
Organometallics 2008, 27, 6614–6622.
2a are on opposite sides of the central
p system, while those in
3a they are on the same side. In all the three compounds, the
potential coordination environment provided by two adjacent
quinolinyl groups closely resembles that of ttqb ligands, albeit
the central linkers have much larger
p systems.
13. Liu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Ren, A.; Feng, J. J. Mol. Model. 2011, 17, 1413–1425.
14. Khoo, I. C.; Webster, S.; Kubo, S.; Youngblood, W. J.; Liou, J. D.; Mallouk, T. E.;
Lin, P.; Hagan, D. J.; Van Stryland, E. W. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 7525–7531.
15. Ozawa, R.; Hamaguchi, H. Chem. Lett. 2001, 736–737.
16. Suzuki, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 576, 147–168.
17. Hu, J.; Era, M.; Elsegood, M. R. J.; Yamato, T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 72–79.
18. Mio, M. J.; Kopel, L. C.; Braun, J. B.; Gadzikwa, T. L.; Hull, K. L.; Brisbois, R. G.;
Markworth, C. J.; Grieco, P. A. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3199–3202.
19. McMurry, J. E.; Fleming, M. P.; Kees, K. L.; Krepski, L. R. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43,
3255–3266.
To explore the generality of these ligand frameworks and tune
the solubility of the ligands as well as the potential complexes,
6-trifluoromethoxy-8-quinolinylboronic acid12 was used as the
coupling partner in the Suzuki reaction. As shown in Scheme 4
and the Supplementary data, the syntheses of 2b and 3b are
comparable to those of 2a and 3a. However, the reaction between
1 and the boronic acid did not give the desired tetrasubstituted
product 1b, presumably due to the sterics. Instead, an appreciable
amount of di- and tri-substituted by-products were observed in
20. Swoboda, P.; Saf, R.; Hummel, K.; Hofer, F.; Czaputa, R. Macromolecules 1995,
28, 4255–4259.