Table 2: RhI/(S,S)-L6 or RhI/(S,S)-L8 catalyst used for the AH of Z or E isomers of b-
(cod)2]BF4/(S,S)-L6. The effects of the substrate
concentration, catalyst concentration, and hydrogen
pressure on the reaction rates were examined. The
consumption of 3o was evaluated by 1H NMR
analysis of aliquots taken from the active hydro-
genation mixture, and the reaction profiles, which
were measured under standard conditions (molar
ratio Rh/(S,S)-L6 = 1:2, T= 268C, CH2Cl2 solvent),
are shown in Figure S5 in the Supporting Informa-
tion. There is no apparent incubation period shown
in the profiles in Figure S5(a), thus suggesting a fast
activation of the precatalyst by hydrogenation of the
cod ligand. In most cases the initial rates are almost
maintained until approximately 50–70% conversion.
The reactions proceed at nearly the same rates for all
the tested substrate concentrations (see Figure S6 in
the Supporting Information), thus indicating a zero-
order dependence of the hydrogenation rate on
substrate concentration. There is a consistent en-
hancement in the initial reaction rates with the
catalyst concentrations from 0.25 to 1.0 mm,
although the profile at [Rh] = 0.25 mm demonstrates
a complex behavior at the early stage of the reaction
[Figure S5(b)]. As shown in Figure S5(c), the cata-
lytic activity increases significantly with ascending
hydrogen pressures, with a TOF value of 1800 hÀ1
being achieved at 4 atm hydrogen (60% conversion
within 2 min). Altogether, the RhI/(S,S)-L6 system
demonstrates high efficiency and excellent enantio-
selectivity in the AH of a broad range of a-enamido
phosphonates, thus suggesting its potential utility in
the synthesis of optically active a-amino phospho-
nates.
enamido phosphonates[a]
Entry Substrate
R
PG Ligand
PH
t
ee [%][b]
2
[atm] [h]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
(Z)-9a
(Z)-9b
(Z)-9c
(Z)-9d
(Z)-9e
(Z)-9 f
(Z)-9g
(Z)-9h
(Z)-9i
(Z)-9j
(Z)-9k
(Z)-9l
(E)-9g
C6H5
4-MeC6H4
4-MeOC6H4 Bz
4-FC6H4
4-ClC6H4
4-BrC6H4
2-ClC6H4
2-naphthyl
3-thienyl
cyclohexyl
2-pyridyl
2-CF3C6H4
2-ClC6H4
Bz
Bz
(S,S)-L6 10
16
>99 (R)
98 (R)
96 (R)
98 (R)
98 (R)
>99 (R)
>99 (R)
95 (R)
>99 (R)
>99 (R)
46 (R)
n.r.
81 (R)
93 (R)
88 (À)
96 (À)
>99 (R)
(S,S)-L6
(S,S)-L6
5
5
12
12
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
24
16
16
16
16
16
24
Bz
Bz
Bz
Bz
Bz
Bz
Bz
Bz
Bz
Bz
Bz
Ac
Ac
Bz
(S,S)-L6 10
(S,S)-L6 10
(S,S)-L6 10
(S,S)-L6 10
(S,S)-L6 10
(S,S)-L6 10
(S,S)-L6 10
(S,S)-L6 45
(S,S)-L6 10
(S,S)-L6 10
(S,S)-L6 10
(S,S)-L8 10
(S,S)-L8 10
(S,S)-L6 40
9
10
11[c]
12
13
14
15
16
17[d]
9g (E/Z=1:4) 2-ClC6H4
(E)-9m
(Z)-9m
(Z)-9 f
4-MeC6H4
4-MeC6H4
4-BrC6H4
[a] Unless otherwise specified, the conversions were >99% as determined by
31P NMR analysis. Reaction conditions: [9a–m]=125 mm, [Rh-
(cod)2]BF4 =1.25 mm, Rh/(S,S)-L6 (or (S,S)-L8)=1:2. [b] Determined by chiral
HPLC analysis using a chiral stationary phase. Absolute configuration of 10e was
determined by X-ray crystal structure analysis, while those of 10a–d and 10 f–k were
assigned by comparison of their CD spectra to that of (R)-10e (see the Supporting
Information), [c] 15% conversion. [d] 0.1 mol% catalyst loading, 95% conversion.
n.r.= no reaction, PG=protecting group.
higher hydrogen pressure (45 atm; Table 2, entry 11). The
Encouraged by these results, we moved to examine the
catalytic efficiency of RhI/(S,S)-L6-type complexes in the AH
of the more demanding b-enamido phosphonate esters.
Compound (Z)-9b was used as the model substrate for
optimization of the reaction conditions and ligand screening.
RhI/(S,S)-L6 was again found to be optimal in terms of both
reactivity and enantioselectivity, and effected complete con-
version into 10b (98% ee) after 12 hours in CH2Cl2 under
5 atm H2 (see the Supporting Information). Extension of the
protocol to the AH of a series of b-enamido phosphonate
esters was also generally successful, and the results are
summarized in Table 2. For the (Z)-b-enamido phosphonates
having an aromatic substituent, the reactions proceeded
smoothly to full conversions and the enantioselectivities
were generally excellent, ranging from 95 to greater than
99% ee (Table 2, entries 1–8). An exception is the reaction
involving the substrate with a strongly electron-withdrawing
2-CF3-substituted phenyl group [(Z)-9l]; in this case no
product was detected under similar reaction conditions
(Table 2, entry 12). It is also noteworthy that by using this
protocol, for the first time, (Z)-b-enamido phosphonates
bearing a b-heteroaryl or an b-alkyl substitutent can be
hydrogenated with excellent enantioselectivity (Table 2,
entries 9 and 10, respectively). However, the system is
substantially less efficient for the substrate with a b-2-pyridyl
substituent as the reaction proceeds sluggishly even under a
RhI/Dpenphos catalytic system RhI/(S,S)-L6 or RhI/(S,S)-L8
also gave satisfactory results in the AH of (E)-b-enamido
phosphonates, albeit with a somewhat lower enantioselectiv-
ity compared to their Z isomers (Table 2, entries 13 versus 7,
and 15 versus 16). The catalyst can therefore tolerate the use
of an E/Z = 1:4 isomeric mixture of substrate 9g to afford the
corresponding product with a compromised enantioselectivity
(Table 2, entry 14). It is noteworthy that so far not a single
catalyst has been reported to be efficient for the hydro-
genation of Z/E mixtures of b-enamido phosphonates. Finally,
under a reduced catalyst loading of 0.1 mol%, the AH of (Z)-
9 f under 40 atm of H2 afforded 95% conversion into 10 f with
a greater than 99% ee after 24 hours (Table 2, entry 17).
To understand the structural details of the catalyst
precursor, a single crystal of the complex [Rh(cod){(S,S)-
L6)}2]BF4 was grown from the CH2Cl2/acetone/n-hexane
(1:1:1) solvent mixture and characterized by X-ray crystallog-
raphy. As shown in Figure 1, the complex contains two
phosphoramidite ligands, (S,S)-L6, coordinated to rhodium
through the P atom, with a square-planar coordination
arrangement around the metal center. Such a pattern is
typical for closely related Rh/phosphoramidite complexes
reported previously by the groups of Reetz[17] and Zhou[18] as
well as ourselves.[13a] The Rh P bond lengths of [Rh(cod)-
À
{(S,S)-L6)}2]BF4 (2.2679(12) and 2.2727(13) ꢀ) are essentially
in keeping with the literature values of these complexes,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 11743 –11747
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim