major product (Scheme 2).21 Additional optimization of the
reaction conditions allowed us to lower the catalyst loading
(from 12 to 3 mol %) and reaction temperature (from 80 to
40 °C) with a negligible decrease in yield (82%). These lower
catalyst loadings, when compared to prior work,3 are valu-
able in the preparation of pure materials for device studies.
Prior work with 2a was reported before modern structural
characterization methods were available.12 Our data for 2a
are in agreement with the previous reports, and we were able
to confirm the structure by X-ray crystallography.
Scheme 1. Potential Products upon Treatment of 1a with a
Phenyl Nucleophile and Pd Catalyst
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 9,10-Diphenylindeno[1,2,3-fg]tetracene 2aa
a Conditions A: PhMgBr (12 equiv), PEPPSI-IPR (10 mol %), dioxane,
80 °C, 24 h (84%). Conditions B: PhMgBr (10 equiv), PEPPSI-IPR
(3 mol %), Et2O, 40 °C, 16 h (82%). Yields are of recrystallized material.
electronic devices, given their relationship to rubrene, a
benchmark organic semiconductor.9À11 Although the syn-
theses of 2a12À14 and 315 were reported decades ago, they
require harsh reaction conditions and, in our hands, were
low yielding.
We explored the reaction scope by incorporating groups
that might alter optoelectronic properties. The reac-
tion tolerated both electron-donating and -releasing sub-
stituents at the para position of the Grignard reagents
(entries 2À6, Table 1). An aryl Grignard reagent bearing 3,
5-dimethoxy groups reacted with 1a to provide 2g in good
yield (73%, entry 7). Albeit in diminished yields, an aryl
Grignard reagent with even more substituents was tolerated
under the reaction conditions (entry 8). The lower yields of 2h
and 2f are partially attributed to difficulties in the purification
(entries 6 and 8). Grignard reagents bearing ortho-alkyl
groups (entries 9 and 10) were not effective, likely because
additional steric hindrance slows the cross-coupling step. We
were unable to isolate any of the corresponding diarylindeno-
[1,2,3-fg]tetracene in an attempted reaction of 1a with 4-tri-
fluoromethylphenyl magnesium bromide (not shown).
To probe whether indene formation precedes or follows
the standard cross-coupling events, we prepared two po-
tential intermediates 4 and 5 (Scheme 3), which were
separately subjected to our above reaction conditions.
Indene 2a was formed in both experiments, indicating that
either 4 or 5 is a potential intermediate. Compound 4
proceeded cleanly to 2a (44%). By contrast, the conversion
of 5 to 2a was very low yielding (<5%), likely because of
the poor solubility of 5. If 5 is a viable intermediate in the
conversion of 1a to 2a, it must not build up in sufficient
amounts to precipitate from solution.
Herein, we report a new synthesis of 9,10-diarylindeno-
[1,2,3-fg]tetracenes via a chemoselective KumadaÀTamaoÀ
Corriu coupling/CÀH activation cascade reaction. In our
cascade, one pair of peri-chlorides undergoes standard
KumadaÀTamaoÀCorriu coupling while the other pair
undergoes the CÀH activation cascade. We reduced the
catalyst loading for the CÀH activation by an order of
magnitude. Our route is easily scaled and allows for late-
stage diversification. To the best of our knowledge, these
diarylindeno[1,2,3-fg]tetracenes constitute a new class of
acene materials for organic photovoltaic cells (OPVs).16À18
Our success in the cross-coupling reaction of 1a with
MeMgBr as a nucleophile6 using the PEPPSI-IPR19,20
catalyst encouraged us to explore the reaction of PhMgBr
with 1a. We did not isolate any rubrene (1b) or di-indene
(3) from this attempt. Rather, we isolated 9,10-
diphenylindeno[1,2,3-fg]tetracene (2a) in 84% yield as the
(9) Taima, T.; Sakai, J.; Yamanari, T.; Saito, K. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.
2006, 45, L995.
(10) Perez, M. D.; Borek, C.; Forrest, S. R.; Thompson, M. E. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9281.
(11) Najafov, H.; Lee, B.; Zhou, Q.; Feldman, L. C.; Podzorov, V.
Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 938.
(12) IR spectrum: Naerland, A. Acta Chem. Scand. 1958, 12, 224.
(13) UVÀvis spectrum: Dufraisse, C.; Amiard, G. Compt. Rend.
1945, 220, 695.
(14) Melting point and combustion analysis: Dufraisse, C.; Badoche,
M. Compt. Rend. 1931, 193, 529.
(15) Lang, K. F.; Theiling, E. A. Chem. Ber. 1956, 89, 2734.
(16) Yoo, S.;Domercq, B.; Kippelen, B. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 5427.
(17) Yoo, S.; Domercq, B.; Kippelen, B. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 103706.
(18) Chu, C.; Shao, Y.; Shrotriya, V.; Yang, Y. Appl. Phys. Lett.
2005, 86, 243506.
Thin film absorption spectra can indicate the degree of
conjugation of the various functional groups (Figure 1).
Figure 1a compares the thin film absorption spectra of
indenes with R = H, R = F, and R = OMe. Figure 1b
compares changes in the thin film absorption for indenes
containing either three, six, or nine OMe groups. Increased
conjugation of the oxygen lone pairs (R = OMe) may
(19) Review: Kantchev, E. A. B.; O’Brien, C. J.; Organ, M. M. G.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2768.
(20) Use in KumadaÀTamaoÀCorriu reactions: Organ, M. G.;
Abdel-Hadi, M.; Avola, S.; Hadei, N.; Nasielski, J.; O’Brien, C. J.;
Valente, C. Chem.;Eur. J. 2007, 13, 150.
(21) A sample of 2a was bench stable for up to 6 months in a
N2-flushed, clear glass scintillation vial, as determined by 1H NMR.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 6, 2012
1391