solution. Upon formation of the Ag–L = 1 : 1 gel, the lumines-
cent spectrum of the gel is similar to the overall profile of the
ligand in dilute solution with comparable emission intensity,
suggesting interesting emission enhancement in the gel state.14
We would conclude that the Ag–L = 1 : 1 systems and gel for-
mation significantly reduce the degree of aggregation via π–π
interactions.
A possible formation mechanism of the gel nanofibres may be
thus proposed. Py2Phos with divergent phosphorus and pyridyl
donors may efficiently bridge the Ag+ ions to form oligomeric or
polymeric species as revealed by NMR. The Ag–L = 1 : 1 com-
position of the gel and the 1 : 2 composition of the crystal struc-
tures suggest that differences in coordination interactions may be
important in establishing whether gelation or crystallisation
occurs. Stronger Ag–P and Ag–N(pyridyl) coordination bonds
are the primary forces to direct the structure and form the nanofi-
bres, while π–π interactions between the ligands are remarkably
suppressed. Especially, anions (OTf−) play a key role in for-
mation and stabilisation of the nanofibres, which however is
undefined so far.
In summary, rigid terpyridine phosphine-containing lumines-
cent gels have been synthesised. The gel formation is dependent
on metal-to-ligand ratio, anion, solvent and concentration. Ag-
ligand coordination bond is crucial for the gelation by reducing
π–π interactions between terpyridine groups. The gel emits blue
luminescence, which emission intensity is comparable to that of
the ligand in dilute solution.
Acknowledgements
Fig. 4 (a) Photoluminescence spectra of AgOTf/Py2Phos = 1 : 1
systems in solution and gel states, (b) Ag/Py2Phos = 1 : 1 solutions
(0.0025 mol L−1) with different anions, and AgOTf/Py2Phos = 1 : 2 sol-
ution (c(Py2Phos) = 0.01 mol L−1), measured in CHCl3–MeCN (v : v =
1 : 1) at RT, and (c) solid-state emission spectra of Py2Phos (λex
360 nm) and AgOTf (λex 385 nm).
We acknowledge the NSFC (20903121 and U0934003), the
NSFGP (S2011010001307), the RFDP of Higher Education of
China, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Univer-
sities, and the 973 Program (2012CB821701) for support.
Notes and references
changes significantly. The emission is indicative of ligand-based
intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) character. A structured lumi-
nescent spectrum was obtained for the Ag–L = 1 : 1 solution at
higher concentration (10−2 mol L−1, prior to gelation). The stron-
gest emission peaks appear at the same positions to other sol-
utions (ca. 407 and 430 nm excited at 375 nm) with decreased
emission. It is noticeable that the emission increases as the sol-
ution starts to form gel. The gel (10−2 mol L−1) exhibits similar
emission characteristics upon excitation at 375 nm (Fig. 4a).
In comparison, the Ag–L = 1 : 2 solution shows a lower
energy emission at ca. 480 nm with a shoulder at ca. 400 nm
(Fig. 4b). It is attributed to π–π interactions compared with the
emission of AgOTf in the solid state. The emission spectrum of
1 (a) M.-O. M. Piepenbrock, G. O. Lloyd, N. Clarke and J. W. Steed,
Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 1960; (b) F. Fages, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006,
45, 1680.
2 (a) S.-i. Kawano, N. Fujita and S. Shinkai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126,
8592; (b) H.-J. Kim, J.-H. Lee and M. Lee, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2005, 44, 5810; (c) A. Kishimura, T. Yamashita, K. Yamaguchi and
T. Aida, Nat. Mater., 2005, 4, 546; (d) J. Liu, P. He, J. Yan, X. Fang,
J. Peng, K. Liu and Y. Fang, Adv. Mater., 2008, 20, 2508; (e) Y. Pan,
Y. Gao, J. Shi, L. Wang and B. Xu, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 6804;
(f) Y. M. A. Yamada, Y. Maida and Y. Uozumi, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 4259.
3 P. Dastidar, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 2699.
4 K. N. King and A. J. McNeil, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 3511.
5 (a) Q. Wei and S. L. James, Chem. Commun., 2005, 1555; (b) M.
R. Lohe, M. Rose and S. Kaskel, Chem. Commun., 2009, 6056;
(c) S. Zhang, S. Yang, J. Lan, Y. Tang, Y. Xue and J. You, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2009, 131, 1689; (d) S. Zhang, S. Yang, J. Lan, S. Yang and J. You,
Chem. Commun., 2008, 6170; (e) T. D. Hamilton, D.-K. Bucar,
J. Baltrusaitis, D. R. Flanagan, Y. Li, S. Ghorai, A. V. Tivanski and L.
R. MacGillivray, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 3365; (f) H. Lee, S.
H. Jung, W. S. Han, J. H. Moon, S. Kang, J. Y. Lee, J. H. Jung and
S. Shinkai, Chem.–Eur. J., 2011, 17, 2823.
AgOTf exhibits a weak broad peak at ca. 478 nm (λex
=
385 nm), which undergoes a red shift from ca. 468 nm of the
ligand (λex = 360 nm) attributed to coordination interactions
between Py2Phos and Ag(I) ions (Fig. 4c). In addition, in the
−
presence of other anions such as BF4−, CF3CO2−, ClO4 and
6 (a) J. Zhang, S. Chen, S. Xiang, J. Huang, L. Chen and C. Y. Su, Chem.–
Eur. J., 2011, 17, 2369; (b) J. Huang, L. He, J. Zhang, L. Chen and C.
Y. Su, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2010, 317, 97; (c) S. Xiang, L. Li,
J. Zhang, X. Tan, H. Cui, J. Shi, Y. Hu, L. Chen, C. Y. Su and S.
L. James, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 1862–1867.
OTs−, the 1 : 1 solutions exhibit an emission peak at around
400 nm and a broad shoulder at 465 nm, suggesting aggregation
via π–π interactions (Fig. 4b).
Overall, π–π interactions facilitate excimer formation and
weaken light emission in solid state and the Ag–L = 1 : 2
7 (a) S. L. James, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1744; (b) R. J. Puddephatt,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 2012; (c) R. Meijboom, R. J. Bowan and S.
3618 | Dalton Trans., 2012, 41, 3616–3619
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012