2
H. Zhang et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 61 (2020) 151944
polar or less polar solvents, such as THF, dichloromethane or
Result and discussion
DMF (entries 3, 11, 12 and 13, Table 1). In general, higher yields
of the desired products were obtained at lower temperatures, the
higher reaction temperature led to a significant decrease of reac-
tion yield (60 °C, entry 14, Table 1). To our delight, the reaction
yield was increased up to 84% when the temperature was
decreased to 0 °C (entry 15, Table 1), and in most cases, the reac-
tion was completed within several hours.
However, the reaction of 3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-phenylacry-
lonitrile (1l) with methyl isocyanoacetate (2a) under the same
reaction condition only generated a trisubstituted pyrrole 4 in
62% yield. The identity of 4 was determined by spectral analysis
and further confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis
(Scheme 2) [4]. Similar findings were reported by Bullington and
Samet as side-products in their synthesis [5d,8]. These results
suggest that the cyclic 1-azadiene moiety is essential for the
formation of 3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrole ring. Based on the above
preliminary results, a plausible mechanism for this process is
proposed in Scheme 3. The formation of compound 4 presumably
arises from initial Michael addition undergoing a retro-Michael
with the leaving group being phenylacetonitrile (A ? B). The
resulting intermediate then reacted with isocyanoacetate again
to obtain intermediate C, followed by a subsequent prototropic
These findings prompted us to turn our attention to optimizing
the conditions for the efficient formation of this series of 3,4-dihy-
dro-2H-pyrroles. The investigation was initiated with 2-(benzoth-
iazol-2-yl)acrylonitrile (1a) and methyl isocyanoacetate (2a) as
model substrates to optimize the reaction conditions, 2-(benzoth-
iazol-2-yl)acrylonitrile (1a) and it’s analogues were synthesized
according to the method previously described [7]. The nature of
the base was found to have a pronounced impact on the process.
The reaction did not proceed in the absence of base (entry 1,
Table 1). Among the organic bases, DBU (1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]un-
dec-7-ene) was shown to be more effective than DABACO and tri-
ethylamine (entries 2–5, Table 1). Moreover, among the different
inorganic bases tested, potassium carbonate was the best base
for this reaction, and the corresponding yield was enhanced up
to 55% (entry 8, Table 1). Using weaker bases, such as sodium
bicarbonate (entry 6, Table 1), or stronger bases, such as sodium
hydroxide (entry 7, Table 1), no product was formed. Lower yield
was observed when using 10% equimolar ratio of potassium car-
bonate (entry 10, Table 1), which indicated that an equimolar
amount of base was required. Moreover, the decrease of the reac-
tion yield was observed when the solvent was switched to non-
Table 1
Optimization of reaction conditions.a
Entry
Base (mol%)
Solvent
Temp/°C
Yield (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
–
MeOH
MeOH
THF
60
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
60
0
0
DBU(100)
DBU(100)
DABCO(100)
TEA(100)
42
24
38
0
0
0
55
32
23
25
15
32
6
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
MeOH
THF
CH2Cl2
DMF
MeOH
MeOH
NaHCO3(100)
NaOH(100)
K2CO3(100)
Na2CO3(100)
K2CO3(10)
K2CO3(100)
K2CO3(100)
K2CO3(100)
K2CO3(100)
K2CO3(100)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
84
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (3.42 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), 2a (1.1 equiv.), base (mol%), solvent (20 mL), 3 h.
Isolated yield.
b
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 4.[a] [a] Reaction conditions: 1l (1.0 equiv.), 2a (1.1 equiv.), K2CO3 (1.0 equiv.), MeOH (5 mL), 0 °C, 3 h. [b] Isolated yield.