Published on Web 07/22/2010
A New Family of Nonionic Dendritic Amphiphiles Displaying
Unexpected Packing Parameters in Micellar Assemblies
Britta Trappmann,†,‡,§ Kai Ludwig,§,| Michał R. Radowski,† Anuj Shukla,‡
Andreas Mohr,† Heinz Rehage,‡ Christoph Bo¨ttcher,*,| and Rainer Haag*,†
Institut fu¨r Chemie und Biochemie, Freie UniVersita¨t Berlin, Takustrasse 3,
14195 Berlin, Germany, Physikalische Chemie II, UniVersita¨t Dortmund, Otto-Hahn-Strasse 6,
44227 Dortmund, Germany, and Forschungszentrum fu¨r Elektronenmikroskopie, Institut fu¨r
Chemie und Biochemie, Freie UniVersita¨t Berlin, Fabeckstrasse 36a, 14195 Berlin, Germany
Received March 1, 2010; E-mail: haag@chemie.fu-berlin.de; christoph.boettcher@fzem.fu-berlin.de
Abstract: In this paper we report on the synthesis of a new family of nonionic dendritic amphiphiles that
self-assemble into defined supramolecular aggregates. Our approach is based on a modular architecture
consisting of different generations of hydrophilic polyglycerol dendrons [G1-G3] connected to hydrophobic
C11 or C16 alkyl chains via mono- or biaromatic spacers, respectively. All amphiphiles complex hydrophobic
compounds as demonstrated by solubilization of Nile Red or pyrene. The structure of the supramolecular
assemblies as well as the aggregation numbers are strongly influenced by the type of the dendritic
headgroup. While the [G1] amphiphiles form different structures such as ringlike and fiberlike micelles, the
[G2] and [G3] derivatives aggregate toward spherical micelles of low polydispersity clearly proven by
transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements. In the case of the biaromatic [G2] derivative, the
structural persistence of the micelles allowed a three-dimensional structure determination from the TEM
data and confirmed the aggregation number obtained by static light scattering (SLS) measurements. On
the basis of these data, molecular packing geometries indicate a drastic mass deficit of alkyl chains in the
hydrophobic core volume of spherical micelles. It is noteworthy that these highly defined micelles contain
as little as 15 molecules and possess up to 74% empty space. This behavior is unexpected as it is very
different from classical detergent micelles such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), where the hydrophobic
core volume is completely filled by alkyl chains.
Introduction
remaining challenge is the generation of structurally persistent
aggregates3 that act as stable nanocarriers for hydrophobic drugs
Nonionic polymeric amphiphiles have attracted special inter-
est due to their tendency to form very stable aggregates and
are therefore useful for the efficient solubilization of active
agents, for example, in drug delivery.1 Among them are many
biocompatible poly(ethylene glycol)- (PEG-) based surfactants,
such as Cremophor, Pluronics, and Tween, which have been
extensively used to formulate hydrophobic drugs.2 Advantages
over ionic amphiphiles include their pH independency and the
generation of nontoxic nanoparticulate aggregates, which pro-
vide a great benefit for drug delivery. However, in contrast to
charged amphiphiles, which can assemble into defined aggre-
gates,3-5 nonionic surfactants have been previously reported
to lead to diverse and ill-defined micelles.1a Therefore, a
and dyes. Because of their low polydispersity and their tunable
size, dendritic structures are promising for the construction of
new amphiphiles. Grinstaff and co-workers6 have synthesized
dendritic amphiphiles from glycerol, succinic acid, and myristic
acid. By varying the hydrophobic-to-hydrophilic ratio and
including ionic headgroups, a wide range of aqueous aggregation
behavior could be studied but no defined structures were
observed. Furthermore, Percec et al. and also Lee and co-
workers7 have shown that aromatic units can drastically enhance
the stability of supramolecular assemblies. Depending on the
nature of the incorporated hydrophobic branch, hollow as-
(5) Schade, B.; Ludwig, K.; Bo¨ttcher, C.; Hartnagel, U.; Hirsch, A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4393–4396.
† Institut fu¨r Chemie und Biochemie, Freie Universita¨t Berlin.
‡ Universita¨t Dortmund.
(6) (a) Luman, N. R.; Grinstaff, M. W. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4863–4866.
(b) Meyers, S. R.; Juhn, F. S.; Griset, A. P.; Luman, N. R.; Grinstaff,
M. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14444–14445.
§ B.T. and K.L. contributed equally.
| Forschungszentrum fu¨r Elektronenmikroskopie, Institut fu¨r Chemie und
Biochemie, Freie Universita¨t Berlin.
(7) (a) Percec, V.; Peterca, M.; Dulcey, A. E.; Imam, M. R.; Hudson,
S. D.; Nummelin, S.; Adelman, P.; Heiney, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 13079–13094. (b) Kim, J.-K.; Lee, E.; Huang, Z.; Lee, M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14022–14023. (c) Percec, V.; Dulcey,
A. E.; Balagurusamy, V. S. K.; Miura, Y.; Smidrkal, J.; Peterca, M.;
Nummelin, S.; Edlund, U.; Hudson, S. D.; Heiney, P. A.; Duan, H.;
Magonov, S. N.; Vinogrador, S. A. Nature 2004, 430, 764–768. (d)
van Dongen, S. F. M.; De Hoog, H.-P. M.; Peters, R. J. R. W.; Nallani,
M.; Nolte, R. J. M.; van Hest, J. C. M. Chem. ReV. 2009, 109, 6212–
6274. (e) Rosen, B. M.; Wilson, C. J.; Wilson, D. A.; Peterca, M.;
Imam, M. R.; Percec, V. Chem. ReV. 2009, 109, 6275–6540.
(1) (a) Schick, M. J. Nonionic Surfactants: Physical Chemistry; CRC Press:
Boca Raton, FL, 1987. (b) Haag, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43,
278–282.
(2) Kabanov, A. V.; Alakhov, V. Y. Crit. ReV. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst.
2002, 19, 1–72.
(3) Kellermann, M.; Bauer, W.; Hirsch, A.; Schade, B.; Ludwig, K.;
Bo¨ttcher, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2959–2962.
(4) Burghardt, S.; Hirsch, A.; Schade, B.; Ludwig, K.; Bo¨ttcher, C. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2976–2979.
9
10.1021/ja101523v 2010 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2010, 132, 11119–11124 11119