Slides were viewed on an inverted Olympus Fluoview 1000
confocal laser scanning system utilizing a Olympus IX-81
microscope with a 40x oil objective and 2x digital zoom. The
dyes were excited by a 488 nm argon ion laser, and emission
was captured at 559 nm. The dimensions of the images taken
were 1024 Â 1024 pixels and a z-scan analysis was performed
capturing a minimum of 10 planes. On average vesicles imaged
were 10 Æ 2 microns in diameter.
The project described was supported by Grant Number
SC2CA167636 from the National Cancer Institute. The
content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does
not necessarily represent the official views of the National
Cancer Institute or the National Institutes of Health. Confocal
microscopy was supported by a grant from the National
Science Foundation (DBI0722757), with additional support
from the Department of Biological Sciences and College of
Natural Science and Mathematics.
References
Fig. 4 Fluorescent confocal images (Olympus Fluoview 1000, IX-81;
ex: 488; em 559; 40 X; z-scan analysis) of prepared DLPC vesicles that
had 1 mol% of cavitand 3 present at four different heights in the
z-dimension (heights listed). Vesicles are approximately 10 microns.
1 D. M. Rudkevich, G. Hilmersson and J. Rebek, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1998, 120, 12216–12225.
2 T. Haino, D. M. Rudkevich, A. Shivanyuk, K. Rissanen and
J. Rebek, Chem.–Eur. J., 2000, 6, 3793.
3 F. Hof, L. Trembleau, E. C. Ullrich and J. Rebek, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 3150–3153.
4 C. H. Haas, S. M. Biros and J. Rebek, Chem. Commun., 2005,
6044–6045.
biological problems. We will report our findings on some of
these points in due course.
5 M. P. Schramm, R. J. Hooley and J. Rebek, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2007, 129, 9773–9779.
6 S. Javor and J. Rebek, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 17473–17478.
7 Y. J. Kim, M. T. Lek and M. P. Schramm, Chem. Commun., 2011,
47, 9636–9638.
8 Y. Liu, P. Liao, Q. Cheng and R. J. Hooley, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2010, 132, 10383–10390.
9 R. Lalor, H. Baillie-Johnson, C. Redshaw, S. E. Matthews and
A. Mueller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 2892–2893.
10 F. Hauke, A. J. Myles and J. Rebek, Chem. Commun., 2005,
4164–4166.
11 B. W. Purse, A. Gissot and J. Rebek, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
11222–11223.
12 E. S. Barrett, T. J. Dale and J. Rebek, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007,
129, 3818–3819.
13 P. Walde, K. Cosentino, H. Engel and P. Stano, ChemBioChem,
2010, 11, 848–865.
Experimental procedure for vesicle preparation and visualization:
1,2 dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (15 mL, 0.0804 M in
chloroform, Avantis Polar Lipids), methanol (200 mL),
chloroform (1 mL), and Hepes (3 mL, 0.01 M in 18.2 MO
H2O) were placed in a 50 mL pear-shaped flask. The solution
was slowly rotovapped at 10 mmHg, 40 1C, 40 rpm for
4–5 min.14 After two distillation events were observed an
opaque liquid resulted. When using cavitand 3, 1 mol% was
added prior to vesicle formation. When using fluorescein-
choline 4, 2.5 mol% was added prior to or post vesicle
formation. When using carboxyfluorescein, 5 mol% was
added prior to or post vesicle formation (see ESIw). For gel
filtration we employed Bio Rad Econo-Pacs 10 DG 10 mL
Disposable Chromatography Columns and for dialysis
Spectra/Pors Dialysis Membrane, MWCO: 6–8000, Nominal
14 A. Moscho, O. Orwar, D. T. Chiu, B. P. Modi and R. N. Zare,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1996, 93, 11443–11447.
15 J. Korlach, P. Schwille, W. W. Webb and G. W. Feigenson,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1999, 96, 8461–8466.
16 O. B. Berryman, A. C. Sather and J. Rebek, Org. Lett., 2011, 13,
5232–5235.
Flat Width: 10 mm, Diameter: 6.4 mm, Vol/Length: 0.32 mL cmÀ1
,
Lot # 3248269, using a minimum of 3 buffer exchanges.
Deepwell slides were prepared using 80 mL of GUV solutions.
c
876 New J. Chem., 2012, 36, 874–876
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2012