COMMUNICATION
This protocol provides an efficient and convenient ap-
proach to fused heterocycles bearing a quaternary stereo-
center[15] with excellent reaction efficiency (up to 94%
yield), high enantioselectivities (up to 96% ee), and great
diastereoselectivities (>95:5 d.r.).
At the outset of the studies, 3-nitro-2H-chromene 1a and
1-benzyl-2-vinyl-1H-indole 2a were chosen as model sub-
strates for this asymmetric [4+2] cycloaddition reaction. A
variety of Lewis acids and the chiral ligands were investigat-
ed, and the representative results are summarized in
Table 1. In the presence of chiral ligand I, the screening of
triflates were used, no desired product was observed
(Table 1, entries 8 and 9). To improve the enantioselectivity
of this process, we further examined chiral ligands.[16] The
tabulated results showed that tridentate bis(oxazoline)
ligand I was the most promising ligand, and it was found to
be more active than ligands III–V (Table 1, entry 1 vs. en-
tries 11–13). Ligand II, which is otherwise identical to ligand
I but has the opposite configuration, gave comparable re-
sults (Table 1, entry 10). Other C2-symmetric bis(oxazoline)
ligands VI–VIII had detrimental effects on the enantioselec-
tivity, albeit with good yields (Table 1, entries 14–16).
With the optimal chiral Zn-
AHCTUNGERTG(NNUN OTf)2/I complex identified, we
Table 1. Effects of various metal sources and chiral ligands.[a]
continued to examine the reac-
tion media and other parame-
ters to further improve the
chemical yield and stereoselec-
tivity. It was found that the re-
actions in toluene and xylenes
gave almost identical results
(Table 2, entries 1 and 2). The
use of halogenated solvents re-
sulted in a substantial decrease
in enantioselectivities, although
high diastereoselectivities were
obtained (Table 2, entries 3 and
4). Notably, the reaction could
also proceed efficiently in ethe-
real solvents, such as Et2O,
MeOtBu, PhOMe, and 1,4-diox-
ane, and generally good results
were achieved, except for in
THF (Table 2, entries 7–10 vs.
entry 6). Variation of the ratio
of metal to ligand I revealed
Entry
Lewis acid
Ligand
t [h]
Yield[b]
[%]
ee[c]
[%]
d.r.[c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Zn
ZnCl2
Cu(OTf)2
In(OTf)3
Sc(OTf)3
Sm(OTf)3
La(OTf)3
Mg(OTf)2
AgOTf
A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
23
108
58
21
19
13
41
130
130
26
48
28
40
45
64
64
88
62
79
80
80
95
91
<5
<5
87
93
94
94
74
93
83
89
7
13
À5
0
0
0
–
–
À86
À71
À80
À63
À5
7
>95:5
>95:5
>95:5
N
R
>95:5 that a 1:1.1 ratio of Zn
>95:5
ACHTUNGRTEN(NUNG OTf)2 to
E
I increased the ee from 89 to
92% (Table 2, entry 11 vs. 1).
Optimizations of the concentra-
tion did not improve the reac-
tion efficiency. The desired cy-
E
>95:5
>95:5
–
G
E
9
I
–
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
Zn
N
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
>95:5
>95:5
>95:5
>95:5
>95:5
cloaddition
worked well even with 5 mol%
catalyst loading, although
reaction
also
a
>95:5 slight decrease in enantioselec-
À4
>95:5
tivity was found for these con-
ditions (Table 2, entry 16). Fi-
nally, we determined that the
[a] Conditions: 1a (0.30 mmol), 2a (0.45 mmol), Lewis acid (10 mol%), ligand (10 mol%), toluene (2.0 mL).
[b] Yield of isolated product after chromatography. [c] Determined by HPLC analysis on a chiral stationary
phase.
use of 10 mol% ZnACHTUNRGTNEUNG(OTf)2 and
11 mol% I in toluene (2.0 mL)
at room temperature were the
metal catalysts demonstrated that Zn
CF3SO3)was the best choice (Table 1, entry 1). ZnCl2 and
Cu(OTf)2 led to moderate yields and low enantioselectivities
(Table 1, entries 2 and 3). In(OTf)3 gave reversed enantiose-
(OTf)2 (OTf=
optimal reaction conditions for this asymmetric [4+2] cyclo-
addition reaction (Table 2, entry 11).
Having established the optimal reaction conditions, we
next explored the scope of this asymmetric [4+2] cycloaddi-
tion reaction. As highlighted in Table 3, a wide range of 3-
nitro-2H-chromenes with electron-donating and -withdraw-
E
AHCTUNGTRENNUNG
lectivity, while other rare-earth triflates gave no enantiose-
lectivities (Table 1, entries 4 and 5–7). When MgII and AgI
494
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Asian J. 2012, 7, 493 – 497