Laura Kersten and Gerhard Hilt
FULL PAPERS
and the solution was strongly stirred until complete depro-
tection was monitored by GC/MS analysis (3–24 h). The
aqueous layer was separated and extracted with diethyl
ether (2ꢂ10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed
with brine and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was removed
under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by
flash column chromatography on silica gel.
duced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column
chromatography on silica gel (pentane:diethyl ether=4:1).
The product 10 was obtained as a yellow oil; yield: 501 mg
(1.34 mmol, 59%).
Ozonolysis
A 10-mL Schlenk tube, fitted with a glass tube to admit
ozone, was charged with 1.0 equivalent of the enone and 3–
6 mL of dichloromethane. The reaction mixture was cooled
to À788C and ozone in a stream of oxygen was bubbled
through the solution. The ozone addition was stopped when
the solution turned blue. The excess of ozone was removed
by passing oxygen through the solution. Then 2.0 equiva-
lents of triphenylphosphine were added and the solution
was allowed to warm to room temperature. After stirring
for 1 h the solvent was removed under reduced pressure.
The residue was absorbed on silica gel and purified by flash
column chromatography.
Mukaiyama-Aldol Reaction
In a flame-dried Schlenk tube fitted with a Teflon screw cap
CoBr2ACHTUNGTRENNUNG(dppe) (0.12 mmol, 10 mol%), anhydrous zinc iodide
(0.24 mmol, 20 mol%) and zinc powder (0.24 mmol,
20 mol%) were suspended in 1 mL of anhydrous dichloro-
methane under an argon atmosphere. Then 1.2 equivalents
of the terminal alkene (1.2 mmol) and 2-trimethylsilyloxy-
1,3-butadiene (1.4–1.8 mmol) were added and the mixture
was stirred at room temperature until complete conversion
of the starting materials was monitored by GC/MS (13–
24 h). Then 5 mL of pentane were added to the suspension
and the reaction mixture was filtered over a short pad of
silica gel (pentane:diethyl ether=1:1). The solvent was re-
moved under reduced pressure and the silyl enol ether was
added to a stirring solution of 1.0 equivalent of freshly dis-
tilled aldehyde (1.0 mmol) in 4 mL of anhydrous dichloro-
methane according to a procedure described by Heath-
cock.[10] The solution was cooled to À788C and 1.0 equiva-
lent of BF3·OEt2 (1.0 mmol) was added dropwise. After 4 h
the reaction was quenched by injecting 2.5 mL of saturated
aqueous NaHCO3. The reaction mixture was allowed to
warm to room temperature and stirred overnight. The aque-
ous layer was separated and extracted with diethyl ether
(3ꢂ30 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over
MgSO4 and the solvent was removed under reduced pres-
sure.
References
[1] a) W. Hess, J. Treutwein, G. Hilt, Synthesis 2008, 3537;
b) I. Omae, Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 21, 318;
c) S. Laschat, A. Becheanu, T. Bell, A. Baro, Synlett
2005, 2547; d) J. A. Varela, C. Saꢃ, Chem. Rev. 2003,
103, 3787; e) M. Malacria, C. Aubert, J. L. Renaud, in:
Science of Synthesis: Houben-Weyl Methods of Molecu-
lar Transformations, (Eds.: M. Lautens, B. M. Trost),
Vol. 1, Thieme, Stuttgart, 2001, 439; f) M. E. Welker,
Curr. Org. Chem. 2001, 5, 785; g) S. Saito, Y. Yamamo-
to, Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2901; h) I. Ojima, M. Tzamar-
ioudaki, Z. Li, R. J. Donovan, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96,
635; i) M. Lautens, W. Klute, W. Tam, Chem. Rev. 1996,
96, 49.
[2] Selected references: a) R. K. Sharma, T. V. RajanBabu,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3295; b) M. M. P. Grut-
ters, J. I. van der Vlugt, Y. Pei, A. M. Mills, M. Lutz,
A. L. Spek, C. Mꢄller, C. Moberg, D. Vogt, Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2009, 351, 2199; c) N. Lassauque, G. Franciꢅ, W.
Leitner, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 3133; d) N. Las-
sauque, G. Franciꢅ, W. Leitner, Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2009, 3199; e) B. Saha, C. R. Smith, T. V. RajanBabu, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9000; f) Q. Zhang, S.-F.
Zhu, X.-C. Qiao, L.-X. Wang, Q.-L. Zhou, Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2008, 350, 1507; g) M. Shirakura, M. Suginome,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5410; h) B. Saha, T. V. Ra-
janBabu, J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 2357; i) A. Zhang, T.
V. RajanBabu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 54;
j) M. M. P. Grutters, C. Mꢄller, D. Vogt, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 7414; k) C. Bçing, G. Franciꢅ, W. Leit-
ner, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 1537.
1
The ratio of isomers was determined by H NMR of the
crude product. If this was not possible due to high complexi-
1
ty of the spectrum, the ratio was determined by H NMR
after purification by column chromatography on silica gel.
In most cases, except for 9e, the pure major isomer (syn-
isomer) could be isolated. The stereochemical assignment
1
(syn or anti) was made by H NMR, using the well-accepted
J
anti >Jsyn relationship.[14] The coupling constants were deter-
mined by analysis of the proton signal adjacent to the hy-
droxy group CHOH. For a better resolution of the coupling
constants the NMR probe was treated with D2O.
Cu(II)-Initiated Dimerisation
According to a procedure reported by Saegusa[11a] a solution
of 1.1 equivalents of diisopropylamine (5.0 mmol) in 5 mL
anhydrous tetrahydrofuran was treated with 1.1 equivalents
of n-butyllithium (5.0 mmol) at À788C. After 20 min
1.0 equivalent of 5-benzylhex-5-en-2-one (7b) (4.5 mmol)
was added dropwise. After additional stirring for 30 min 1.5
equivalents of anhydrous CuCl2 (7.0 mmol) in anhydrous di-
methylformamide (7 mL) were added in one batch. The
dark green solution was stirred for 30 min at À788C and
then allowed to warm to room temperature. The reaction
was quenched by addition of an aqueous solution of NH4Cl
(5 mL). The aqueous layer was separated and extracted with
diethyl ether (3ꢂ30 mL). The combined organic layers were
dried over MgSO4 and the solvent was removed under re-
[3] G. Hilt, J. Treutwein, Chem. Commun. 2009, 1395.
[4] a) L. Kersten, S. Roesner, G. Hilt, Org. Lett. 2010, 12,
4920; b) M. Arndt, A. Reinhold, G. Hilt, J. Org. Chem.
2010, 75, 5203; c) G. Hilt, M. Arndt, D. F. Weske, Syn-
thesis 2010, 1321.
[5] G. Hilt, A. Paul, J. Treutwein, Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1536.
[6] S. Roesner, G. Hilt, Synthesis 2011, 662.
868
ꢁ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 863 – 869