here has potential utility in creating azaporphyrin analogues
with suitable optical properties for specific applications.
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (C) (No. 23550040) from JSPS and a Grant-in-Aid
for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (No. 20108007,
‘‘pi-Space’’) from MEXT. The authors thank Prof. T. Iwamoto
and Dr S. Ishida in Tohoku Univ. for X-ray measurement.
Notes and references
y Crystallographic data for 1: C15H5F5N2Br2, Mw = 468.03, mono-
clinic, space group C2/c (no. 15), a = 13.432(6), b = 15.534(7), c =
7.285(3) A, b = 93.759(6)1, V = 1516.6(12) A3, Z = 4, rcalcd
=
2.050 g cmꢀ3, T = ꢀ173(2) 1C, 5116 measured reflections, 1332 unique
reflections (Rint = 0.0508), R = 0.0455 (I 4 2s(I)), Rw = 0.1309
(all data), GOF = 1.056, CCDC 862131. Crystallographic data for
the ruthenium complex of 3a: C77H65F5N8ORuꢁCHCl3, Mw
=
1433.81, monoclinic, space group P21/c (no. 14), a = 16.596(4), b =
18.842(4), c = 25.025(6) A, b = 101.216(3)1, V = 7676(3) A3, Z = 4,
rcalcd = 1.241 g cmꢀ3, T = ꢀ173(2) 1C, 71 588 measured reflections,
13 527 unique reflections (Rint = 0.1299), R = 0.0847 (I 4 2s(I)),
Rw = 0.2338 (all data), GOF = 0.958, CCDC 864016.
Fig. 3 Partial MO diagram of 3a (middle), 3b (right), and 3c (left).
1 The porphyrin handbook, ed. K. M. Kadish, K. M. Smith and
R. Guilard, Academic Press, San Diego, 2000, vol. 1–10; The
porphyrin handbook, ed. K. M. Kadish, K. M. Smith and
R. Guilard, Academic Press, San Diego, 2003, vol. 11–20.
2 Handbook of Porphyrin Science, ed. K. M. Kadish, K. M. Smith
and R. Guilard, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2010,
vol. 1–15.
3 Phthalocyanines: properties and applications, ed. C. C. Leznoff and
A. B. P. Lever, VCH, New York, NY, 1989, vol. 1–4.
4 (a) M. Gouterman, J. Chem. Phys., 1959, 30, 1139;
(b) M. Gouterman, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1961, 6, 138.
5 (a) J. H. Helberger and A. V. Rebay, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1937,
531, 279; (b) C. E. Dent, J. Chem. Soc., 1938, 1; (c) P. A. Barrett,
R. P. Linstead and G. A. P. Tuey, J. Chem. Soc., 1939, 1809;
(d) P. A. Barrett, R. P. Linstead, F. G. Rundall and G. A. P. Tuey,
J. Chem. Soc., 1940, 1079.
6 (a) A. N. Cammidge, M. J. Cook, D. L. Hughes, F. Nekelson and
M. Rahman, Chem. Commun., 2005, 930; (b) A. N. Cammidge,
I. Chambrier, M. J. Cook, D. L. Hughes, M. Rahman and L. Sosa-
Vargas, Chem.–Eur. J., 2011, 17, 3136.
These bands are mainly composed of transitions from the
HOMO to the LUMOs. On the other hand, the TDDFT
calculation on 3c reveals four bands with smaller oscillator
strengths of 0.0056–0.080 at 563, 553, 536, and 526 nm in
addition to intense bands at 484 (0.21) and 457 (0.24) nm. The
main components of these bands are transitions from the
HOMO ꢀ 1, HOMO ꢀ 2, and HOMO ꢀ 3 to the LUMOs
in addition to those from the HOMO to the LUMOs. Since the
electron densities are delocalized on the phenyl moieties in the
HOMO ꢀ 1 and HOMO ꢀ 2 of 3c, transitions from these
orbitals to the LUMOs, which are delocalized on the macro-
cycle, can be regarded as a kind of intramolecular charge
transfer transitions. This charge transfer contribution in the Q
band absorption would plausibly cause the observed significant
red-shift of 3c. Similar contribution can be seen in the band
components of 3a and 3b as well, but the Q band components
comprising transitions from the HOMO to the LUMOs become
more predominant in the case of 3a and 3b due to the larger
difference in energies between the HOMO and the second-to-
fourth HOMOs. Considering the fact that TDDFT calculations
predict Q bands at much shorter wavelength regions (528 and
497 nm) for a model compound of 3c in which peripheral
phenyl substituents are not included, the intramolecular
charge transfer contribution cannot be negligible in the case
of 3c (see Table S2 in ESIz).
7 (a) C. C. Leznoff and N. B. Mckeown, J. Org. Chem., 1990,
55, 2186; (b) Y. H. Tse, A. Goel, M. G. Hu, A. B. P. Lever,
C. C. Leznoff and J. E. Van Lier, Can. J. Chem., 1993, 71, 742.
8 (a) N. E. Galanin, L. A. Yakubov, E. V. Kudrik and
G. P. Shaposhnikov, Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 2008, 78, 1436;
(b) Y. B. Ivanova, Y. I. Churakhina, A. S. Semeikin and
N. Z. Mamardashvili, Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 2009, 79, 833.
9 1 was synthesized from a bromination reaction of 5-pentafluoro-
phenyldipyrromethane with NBS in THF at ꢀ78 1C, followed by
oxidation with DDQ. For details see ESIz.
10 N. Kobayashi, S. Nakajima, H. Ogata and T. Fukuda, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2004, 10, 6294.
11 Ruthenium complex of 3a was synthesized by following the
In summary, a series of 5,10,15-triazaporphyrins were
synthesized from mixed-condensation reactions of 1,9-dibromo-
dipyrromethene and 1,3-diiminoisoindoline derivatives.
Compared to other synthetic reactions of 5,10,15-triaza-
porphyrin reported to date, this reaction opens new access
to asymmetric 5,10,15-triazaporphyrin analogues, in which
substituents at meso-positions and peripheral ring units
can be varied using different dibromodipyrromethenes16 and
1,3-diiminoisoindolines. Since the electronic structures of
5,10,15-triazaporphyrins are significantly perturbed by substi-
tuents as can be seen for 3c, the synthetic reaction described
literature procedure; M. S. Rodrıguez-Morgade, M. Planells,
´
T. Torres, P. Ballester and E. Palomares, J. Mater. Chem., 2008,
18, 176.
12 J. Mack, M. J. Stillman and N. Kobayashi, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
2007, 251, 429.
13 Quantum yields were determined relative to cresyl violet (FF = 0.54 in
methanol): D. Magde, J. H. Brannon, T. L. Cremers and J. Olmsted,
J. Phys. Chem., 1979, 83, 696.
14 P. G. Seybold and M. Gouterman, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1969, 31, 1.
15 D. S. Lawrence and D. G. Whitten, Photochem. Photobiol., 1996,
64, 923.
16 5-p-Tolyl-1,9-dibromodipyrromethene was similarly reacted with
1,3-diiminoisoindoline to give a triazaporphyrin compound.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3851–3853 3853