Organic Letters
Letter
thermal-assisted N- to O-sulfonyl transfer could be used to pro-
duce the desired pyridines.12,13 Pleasingly, the oxidation of dihydro-
pyridinone 4 with m-CPBA (1.1 equiv) and excess Na2CO3 in
CH2Cl2 at 0 °C gave the desired sulfoxide in situ which, upon
warming to rt, underwent a sulfoxide elimination to give pyridone
5 (Scheme 2). Finally, heating pyridone 5 in THF at 80 °C for 1 h
promoted complete N- to O-sulfonyl transfer, providing pyridine 6
in 88% yield (62% over three steps). An attempted one-pot pro-
cedure of Michael addition−lactamization, in situ oxidation−
elimination, and N- to O-sulfonyl transfer gave a complex mixture
of the corresponding dihydropyridinone sulfide, sulfone, and
the desired pyridine indicating that isolation of the intermediate
dihydropyridinone 4 is necessary to achieve selective pyridine
formation in high yield.
in good yield for pyridine 14 (59% yield). A benzyl ester
substituent can also be used, giving pyridine 16 in 45%
yield.14
The use of α,α-disubstituted (phenylthio)acetic acids in this
methodology to generate 2,3,5-substituted pyridine 6-tosylates
was next investigated (Table 2). Pleasingly, (phenylthio)phenyl
acetic acid is well tolerated, reacting with ketimine 3 under the
previously optimized conditions to give excellent conversion
into intermediate dihydropyridinone 17 (69% yield) after 1 h
at rt. Subsequent oxidation−elimination and N- to O-sulfonyl
transfer proceeded well, giving pyridine 18 in 63% yield over
the three steps. (Phenylthio)phenyl acetic acid was then used in
this protocol with a range of alkyl 2-[aryl(tosylimino)methyl]-
acrylates containing various aromatic substituents. Highly sub-
stituted pyridines 20, 26, 28, 30, and 34 with electron-rich,
halogen (p-Br and p-Cl), or heteroaromatic substituents were
all formed in good yield (44−72%) over the three-step pro-
tocol. The purification of 3-tolyl, 3,5-xylyl, and 2-naphthalene
substituted intermediate dihydropyridinones 21, 23, and 31
proved difficult leading to a crude mixture of ∼80% purity
being carried forward into the oxidation−elimination/N- to
O- sulfonyl transfer step, giving pyridines 22, 24, and 32 in
overall slightly reduced yields (56%, 44%, and 55% yield,
respectively) compared with the previous examples.15 Alterna-
tive α-aryl (phenylthio)acetic acids are also tolerated in this
methodology, giving the corresponding pyridines 36 and 38 in
(64% and 45% yield, respectively). The ester substituent was
also varied to give pyridine 40 with a benzyl ester in the 3-
position in good yield (58% yield). Disappointingly, the use of
2-(phenylthio)propanoic acid and 3-methyl-2-(phenylthio)-
butanoic acid did not give conversion to the desired dihydro-
pyridinones.
With an effective three-stage sequence to functionalized
pyridines established, the scope of this methodology was evaluated.
First, the synthesis of 2,3-substituted pyridine 6-tosylates was
undertaken from (phenylthio)acetic acid and a range of alkyl
2-[aryl(tosylimino)methyl]acrylates (Table 1). Typically the
Table 1. Reaction Scope: Synthesis of 5,6-Substituted
a
Pyridine 2-Tosylates
A key feature of this process is the incorporation of the
sulfonyl group derived from the ketimine component into a
synthetically useful tosylate functional handle in the product.
To display that this feature allows the rapid assembly of a diverse
range of highly substituted pyridine scaffolds a selection of
derivatizations were undertaken (Scheme 3). Protodetosylation,16
Pd-catalyzed Heck coupling,17 and nucleophilic aromatic sub-
stitution18 reactions with pyridines 6 and 18 gave the correspond-
ing products 41−46 in excellent yields, demonstrating concise
routes to 2,3-, 2,3,6-, 2,3,5-, and 2,3,5,6-substituted pyridines.
The reaction mechanism is thought to proceed by initial
formation of mixed anhydride 47 from the requisite carboxylic
acid and pivaloyl chloride in the presence of base, with
subsequent N-acylation of DHPB 2 generating the correspond-
ing acyl isothiouronium ion 48 (Figure 1). Deprotonation
generates an intermediate ammonium enolate 49, which
undergoes Michael addition with the alkyl 2-[aryl(tosylimino)-
methyl]acrylate 50, followed by lactamization, to generate the
corresponding dihydropyridinone 51 and regenerate DHPB.
Treatment of this product with m-CPBA results in oxidation
into the corresponding sulfoxide 52, which readily eliminates to
provide pyridone 53. Finally, thermally promoted intra-
molecular N- to O-sulfonyl migration affords the desired
functionalized pyridine 54 (Figure 1).
a
Conditions A: t-BuCOCl (3.0 equiv), i-Pr2NEt (3.0 equiv), CH2Cl2,
0 °C, 10 min then DHPB (20 mol %), i-Pr2NEt (1.5 equiv), rt, 1−4 h.
Conditions B: (i) m-CPBA (1.1 equiv), Na2CO3 (39 equiv), CH2Cl2,
b
0 °C−rt, 30 min; (ii) THF, 80 °C, 1 h. Isolated yield over 3 steps.
c
Carried forward as crude residue of ∼80% purity.
Michael addition−lactamization step proceeded in good
isolated yields (62−68%), with the subsequent oxidation−
elimination and N- to O-sulfonyl transfer steps progressing
with excellent yields (88−93% over two steps). The
methodology tolerates electron-neutral aryl substituents,
giving good yields for pyridines 8 and 10 (62% and 56%
over three steps, respectively). Halogen substituted aromatics
are also accepted with pyridine 12 formed in good yield (56%
yield), while heteroaromatic 2-thienyl can also be integrated
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a route to highly func-
tionalized pyridines from (phenylthio)acetic acids and a range
of alkyl 2-[aryl(tosylimino)methyl]acrylates. This process pro-
ceeds via an isothiourea-catalyzed Michael addition−lactamization
to yield a dihydropyridinone. Subsequent sulfoxide elimination
and N- to O-sulfonyl transfer provide the desired pyridine
products wherein the N-sulfonyl group is transformed into a
6497
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol503360q | Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 6496−6499