ORGANIC
LETTERS
2012
Vol. 14, No. 10
2532–2535
A Novel Organic Sensitizer Combined with
a Cobalt Complex Redox Shuttle for
Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells
Chuanjiang Qin, Wenqin Peng, Kun Zhang, Ashraful Islam, and Liyuan Han*
Photovoltaic Materials Unit and NIMS Saint-Gobain Center of Excellence for Advanced
Materials, National Institute for Materials Science, Sengen 1-2-1, Tsukuba,
Ibaraki 305-0047, Japan
Received April 2, 2012
ABSTRACT
A novel donor-π-acceptor organic dye (HIQ7) was used in dye-sensitized solar cells with a cobalt redox shuttle. The cells showed broad incident
monochromatic photon-to-current conversion efficiency spectra covering the entire visible range and extending into the near-infrared region.
Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) have been the subject
of much academic and industrial research, owing to their
potential use for low-cost production of renewable energy
and in large-area, flexible, colorful, lightweight devices.1
Recently, a certified energy conversion efficiency (η) of
11.4% was achieved under standard AM 1.5 conditions
with DSCs based on ruthenium sensitizers.2 Because of the
limited availability of ruthenium, ruthenium-free organic
dyes based on the donor-π-bridge-acceptor (D-π-A) con-
figuration have attracted attention over the past decade.3
Almost all reported high-efficiency DSCs (η > 10%)
have used a iodide/triiodide redox shuttle to regenerate the
oxidized dye.4 However, the cells generate only a limited
open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.7ꢀ0.8 V because the redox
potential of iodide ions is too low for most sensitizing dyes,
even though the dyes have a relatively large energy gap.
Energy loss during the regeneration process is large. More-
over, the iodide/triiodide system is limited by the corro-
siveness of iodide/triiodide and by competitive absorption
of light by triiodide. To overcome these limitations and
increase conversion efficiency, researchers have recently
explored new redox species possessing higher redox poten-
tials than iodide ions, such as iron-, cobalt-, and copper-
based complexes.5 Among them, divalent/trivalent cobalt
bipyridine complexes exhibit impressive performance in
€
(1) (a) O’Regan, B.; Gratzel, M. Nature 1991, 353, 737. (b) Hagfeldt,
A.; Boschloo, G.; Sun, L. C.; Kloo, L.; Pettersson, H. Chem. Rev. 2010,
110, 6595.
(2) Han, L.; Islam, A.; Chen, H.; Malapaka, C.; Chiranjeevi, B.;
Zhang, S.; Yang, X.; Yanagida, M. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6057.
(3) (a) Ning, Z.; Fu, Y.; Tian, H. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 3, 1170.
(b) Gao, F.; Wang, Y.; Shi, D.; Zhang, J.; Wang, M.; Jing, X.; Humphry-
€
Baker, R.; Wang, P.; Zakeeruddin, S. M.; Gratzel, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(5) (a) Daeneke, T.; Kwon, T.-H.; Holmes, A. B.; Duffy, N. W.;
Bach, U.; Spiccia, L. Nat. Chem 2011, 3, 211. (b) Feldt, S. M.; Gibson,
E. A.; Gabrielsson, E.; Sun, L.; Boschloo, G.; Hagfeldt, A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2010, 132, 16714. (c) Zhou, D.; Yu, Q.; Cai, N.; Bai, Y.; Wang, Y.;
Wang, P. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 2030. (d) Bai, Y.; Yu, Q.; Cai, N.;
Wang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Wang, P. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4376.
(6) (a) Bai, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Wang, P.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 113, 11442. (b) Tsao, H. N.; Yi, C.; Moehl, T.;
2008, 130, 10720. (c) Chang, D. W.; Lee, H. J.; Kim, J. H.; Park, S. Y.;
Park, S.-M.; Dai, L.; Beak, J.-B. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3880. (d) Teng, C.;
Yang, X.; Yuan, C.; Li, C.; Chen, R.; Tian, H; Li, S.; Hagfeldt, A; Sun,
L. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5542.
(4) (a) Zhang, M.; Cao, Y.; Bai, Y.; Wang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, M.;
Wang, F.; Pan, C.; Wang, P. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 1915. (b) Chiba, Y.;
Islam, A.; Watanabe, Y.; Komiya, R.; Koide, N.Han, L. Jpn. J. Appl.
Phys., Part 2 2006, 45, L638. (c) Bessho, T.; Zakeeruddin, S. M.; Yeh, C.-Y.;
€
Yum, J.-H.; Zakeeruddin, S. M.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Gratzel, M.
ChemSusChem 2011, 4, 591.
€
Diau, E. W.-G.; Gratzel, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6646.
r
10.1021/ol300807x
Published on Web 05/04/2012
2012 American Chemical Society