alkyne is utilized in compound 3 by Beal et al., in which the
two triple bonds react via strain-promoted thermal reaction
and copper(I)-catalyzed means, respectively.8
groups with inherently different reactivities into one substrate,
such as 4À7 (Figure 2). These bisazides allow for sequential
CuAAC reactions with two distinct alkynes in a one-pot
procedure, without a protection/deprotection cycle. Moreover,
it was shown previously that different alkynes have various
reactivities to chelating azides,10b which makes it possible to
obtain a single product by simply mixing two alkynes and a
bisazide together in one experimental sequence.
Although effective to various degrees, these earlier
approaches suffer from a few limitations. The double-
click method requires a protection/deprotection sequence,
which adds to the workload. The thermal AAC reactions
using strained or electron-deficient alkynes are relatively
slow at rt, in addition to the lack of regioselectivity in
affording 1,4- or 1,5-disubstituted triazoles. Furthermore,
the propiolamide derivatives are prone to Michael ad-
dition with a nucleophile, thus limiting the scope of sub-
strates in sequential ligations. In another noteworthy
double-click method, amino-substituted organic azides
are employed in which a diazo transfer reaction is required
to activate the amino group to azido for the second
CuAAC reaction.9 Herein, wereporta double-conjugation
method in which two CuAAC reactions occur sequentially
in a single reaction mixture without an intervening depro-
tection step. This method affords excellent regioselectivity
while preserving the fast kinetics and large substrate scope
of the CuAAC reaction.
Figure 2. Unsymmetrical bisazides.
The syntheses of unsymmetrical bisazides 4À7 contain-
ing chelating and nonchelating azido groups are included
in the Supporting Information. Bisazides 4 and 7 contain a
2-(azidomethyl)pyridyl chelating component, and an ali-
phatic and a benzylic nonchelating azide, respectively. In
bisazide 5, the N3 nitrogen atom on the triazolyl ring and
the C4-azidomethyl group constitute a chelating compo-
nent, while a nonchelating aliphatic azido group is at-
tached via a 4-carbon linker. Compound 6 has a quinoline
core with a chelating 2-azidomethyl and a nonchelating
6-azidomethyl group. In 4À7, the chelating azido group
would react with an alkyne molecule first under the Cu-
(OAc)2-accelerated conditions,10b leaving the nonchelat-
ing azido group for the CuAAC reaction with the second
alkyne under more strongly reducing conditions.
Scheme 1. Azide Selectivity in CuAAC Reactions
Our group discovered that copper(II) acetate (Cu(OAc)2)
and chelating azides possess uniquely high reactivities in
CuAAC reactions.10 The reactivity difference between che-
lating and nonchelating azides is demonstrated in the two
CuAAC reactions starting with an equal molar mixture of
2-picolylazide and benzylazide (Scheme 1). In the presence of
only Cu(OAc)2, the added alkyne selectively reacts with the
chelating 2-picolylazide to afford triazoles A and C. The
subsequent addition of sodium ascorbate increases the con-
centration of the copper(I) catalyst, leading to the second tri-
azole formation (B and D) involving the nonchelating benzyl-
azide. The chemoselectivity in organic azides (chelating vs
nonchelating) opens up an opportunity to introduce two azido
Figure 3. ORTEP diagram of [Cu2(7)2Cl4] (30% ellipsoids).
Black, carbon and hydrogen; blue, nitrogen; green, chlorine;
orange, copper.
The single crystal structure of complex [Cu2(7)2Cl4]
(Figure 3) reveals the selective azido-copper interaction
in bisazide 7, which is the source of its chemoselectivity in
CuAAC reactions. The copper(II) center is square pyra-
midal, where the bidentate chelating 2-(azidomethyl)-
pyridyl moiety and two chloride ions constitute the square
plane. The nonchelating azido group is left unbound.
1-Ethynyl-4-nitrobenzene and propargyl alcohol were
employed as alkyne substrates in demonstrating the
(8) Beal, D. M.; Albrow, V. E.; Burslem, G.; Hitchen, L.; Fernandes,
C.; Lapthorn, C.; Roberts, L. R.; Selby, M. D.; Jones, L. H. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2012, 10, 548.
(9) Guiard, J.; Fiege, B.; Kitov, P. I.; Peters, T.; Bundle, D. R.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 7438.
(10) (a) Brotherton, W. S.; Michaels, H. A.; Simmons, J. T.; Clark,
R. J.; Dalal, N. S.; Zhu, L. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4954. (b) Kuang, G.-C.;
Guha, P. M.; Brotherton, W. S.; Simmons, J. T.; Stankee, L. A.; Nguyen,
B. T.; Clark, R. J.; Zhu, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 13984.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 10, 2012
2591