Scheme 2
Scheme 3a
For the syntheses of both substrates, we envisioned an
approach as described in Scheme 2. The diallyl piperidine
8, precursor to the ring closing metathesis reaction, would
be accessed following an allylation reaction of the metal-
loenamine generated from compound 5. A ring closing
metathesis of compound 8 would furnish a trans octahy-
droisoquinoline with a quaternary carbon center, which after
a regioselective hydroboration-oxidation sequence would
be converted to the target compounds 1 and 2. The
regiochemical preference of the hydroboration-oxidation
step could be predicted on the basis of molecular orbital
calculations.
The reduction of this plan to practice commenced with
the multigram preparation of 3-allyl-N-methyl-4-piperidinone
3 according to literature procedures.7 Related piperidinones
have been converted to the 3-alkyl-4-aryltetrahydropyridines
similar to 5 via aryl Grignard or aryllithium additions
followed by regioselective dehydration.8 As an alternative
to this strategy, we envisioned the preparation of compound
5 from a precursor vinyl triflate utilizing organopalladium
chemistry (Scheme 3). Thus, the piperidinone 3 was trans-
formed with exclusive regiocontrol to the vinyl triflate 4 in
92% yield with LiHMDS and N-phenyl triflamide9 in THF
at -78 °C. The vinyl triflate was converted to the desired
tetrahydropyridine 5 after Suzuki coupling with the com-
mercially available 3-methoxyphenylboronic acid. The yields
for the Suzuki coupling ranged from 48% to 94%. Optimum
reaction conditions for this step were discovered when the
vinyl triflate and boronic acid were treated with KBr, K3-
PO4, and Pd(PPh3)4 as catalyst in dioxane solvent at 85 °C
to afford compound 5 in 94% yield.10 With tetrahydropyri-
dine 5 available, our attention was turned to the formation
of diallylpiperidine 7. The preparation of diallylpiperidine 7
was achieved via a metalloenamine generation-alkylation
sequence. This sequence was first reported in the context of
a (a) LiHMDS, N-phenyltrifluoromethanesulfonimide, THF -78
°C to rt, 92%; (b) 3-methoxyphenylboronic acid, KBr, K3PO4,
Pd(PPh3)4, 1,4-dioxane, 85 °C, 94%; (c) sec-Buli, allyl bromide,
THF, -45 °C to -78 °C to rt; (d) NaBH4, MeOH, rt, 88% for
steps c and d; (e) ACE-Cl, 1,2-dichloroethane, reflux, then methanol,
reflux; (f) di-tert-butyl dicarbonate, Et3N, dichloromethane, rt, 80%
for steps e and f.
the synthesis of related morphinoid alkaloids.11 In the event,
treatment of compound 5 with sec-BuLi in THF at -45 °C
followed by addition of allyl bromide produced enamine 6
in quantitative yield. The crude enamine was reduced with
NaBH4 in methanol to afford piperidine 7 in 88% yield for
the two steps. The N-methylpiperidine was subsequently con-
verted to the N-Boc equivalent to ultimately produce a com-
pound with an easily removable nitrogen-protecting group,
suitable for analogue formation. Thus, after treatment of 7
with 1-chloroethyl chloroformate in dichloroethane at reflux,
subsequent carbamate methanolysis and treatment of the
crude hydrochloride salt with di-tert-butyl dicarbonate and
triethylamine compound 8 was obtained in 80% overall yield.
With the synthesis of diallylpiperidines 7 and 8 completed,
our attention was turned to the ring closing metathesis trans-
formation (Scheme 4). The diallylpiperidine 8 was converted
to the cyclic olefin 11 after treatment with 0.1 equiv of the
Grubbs catalyst 9 in dichloroethane at 60 °C in 93% yield.
Similarly, the hydrochloride salt of compound 7 was
converted to the corresponding olefin 10 in 88% yield.12
The regioselective functionalization of the olefin in
compound 11 was predicted on the basis of molecular
orbital interactions. Restricted Hartree-Fock calculations
were carried out for the transition states corresponding to
(5) (a) Weller, D.; Gless, R. D.; Rapoport, H. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42,
1485. (b) Cantrell, B. E.; Paschal, J. W.; Zimmerman, D. M. J. Org. Chem.
1989, 54, 1442. (c) Judd, D. B.; Brown, D. S.; Lloyd, J. E.; McElroy, A.
B.; Scopes, D. I. C.; Birch, P. J.; Hayes, A. G.; Sheehan, M. J. J. Med.
Chem. 1992, 35, 48.
(6) See ref 5c.
(7) Bell, K. H.; Portoghese, P. S. J. Med. Chem. 1973, 16, 203.
(8) (a) Barnett, C. J.; Copley-Merriman, C. R.; Maki, J. J. Org. Chem.
1989, 54, 4795. (b) Werner, J. A.; Cerbone, L. R.; Frank, S. A.; Ward, J.
A.; Labib, P.; Tharp-Taylor, R. W.; Ryan, C. W. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
587.
(9) McMurry, J. E.; Scott, W. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 979.
(10) For a review, see: Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95,
2457.
(11) Evans, D. A.; Mitch, C. H.; Thomas, R. C.; Zimmerman, D. M.;
Robey, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 5955.
3484
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 22, 2001