SCHEME 1. Bimolecular Oxidative Amidation of Phenols
SCHEME 2. Possible Oxidative Amidation Mechanism
Improved Procedure for the Bimolecular
Oxidative Amidation of Phenols
Huan Liang and Marco A. Ciufolini*
Department of Chemistry, The UniVersity of British Columbia,
2036 Main Mall, VancouVer, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
ciufi@chem.ubc.ca
ReceiVed February 1, 2008
Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) is an effective promoter of the
bimolecular Ritter-like oxidative amidation of 4-substituted
phenols induced by PhI(OAc)2 in MeCN. This suppresses
the need for fluoroalcohol cosolvents, increases the yields,
and facilitates isolation/purification procedures.
showed that solvolysis of (presumed) species 8 can be avoided
by operating poorly nucleophilic fluoroalcohol media. This
enables capture with various nucleophiles, both in an intra- and
in an intermolecular mode.6 Fluoroalcohol solvents have since
become a standard feature of many such reactions.
In accord with Wood,7 we observed that the use of the more
reactive PhI(OCOCF3)2 (PIFA) in lieu of DIB eliminates the
need for HFIP. However, the formation of polymeric materials
remains a serious problem; furthermore, PIFA is expensive.8
We thus sought a method to induce DIB to react in the absence
of HFIP and in such a manner as to minimize polymer
formation. A solution emerged as detailed herein.
Protic solvents are likely to favor heterolysis of hypervalent
iodine complexes, either by hydrogen bonding (cf. 3, 6) or by
reversible protonation, thereby behaving as acidic promoters.
Indeed, other acidic adjuvants capable of favoring dissociation
of hypervalent iodine species, such as heteropolyacids or TMS-
Br,9 do induce DIB oxidations in nonprotic media. This
suggested that HFIP might be replaceable with a suitable Lewis
or Brønsted acid. On the other hand, polymeric byproducts are
The oxidative amidation of phenols offers interesting op-
portunities in the synthesis of nitrogenous substances.1 This
appears to be especially true of the bimolecular variant of the
process, which converts 4-substituted phenols 1 into dienones
2 (Scheme 1).2 In its original form, the reaction entails attack
of the phenol with PhI(OAc)2 (DIB) in a mixture of MeCN
and 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP). Products 2 emerge
in 40-70% yield, at least on a small scale.
Research focusing on the application of this reaction to current
synthetic problems has required substantial scaling-up of the
original procedure. Reactions run on larger scales afford
products contaminated with much polymeric matter, imposing
the need for impractical, costly chromatographic purifications.
Also, the cost of HFIP3 becomes a significant issue during scale-
up. The need for this cosolvent derives from the fact that the
reaction of phenolic substrates with DIB proceeds poorly in an
aprotic milieu such as plain MeCN,4 whereas nucleophilic protic
solvents such as alcohols or water (S-H in Scheme 2) promote
clean conversion to products 9 (Z ) OMe, OH, etc.), possibly
by the mechanism of Scheme 2. Pioneering work by Kita5
(6) Oxygen nucleophiles; cf. ref 5 as well as (a) Rodr´ıguez, S.; Wipf, P.
Synthesis 2004, 2767. (b) Wipf, P.; Jung, J.-K. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 1469. (c)
Li, C.; Danishefsky, S. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 385. Nitrogen nucleophiles:
cf. refs 1, 2 as well as (d) Scheffler, G.; Seike, H.; Sorensen, E. J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4593. (e) Mizutani, H.; Takayama, J.; Soeda, Y.; Honda, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 2411. (f) Braun, N. A.; Ousmer, M.; Bray, J. D.;
Bouchu, D.; Peters, K.; Peters, E.-M.; Ciufolini, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
4397. (g) Ousmer, M.; Braun, N. A.; Bavoux, C.; Perrin, M.; Ciufolini, M. A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7534. (h) Canesi, S.; Bouchu, D.; Ciufolini, M. A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4336. Carbon nucleophiles: leading reviews
of the massive volume of literature in this area: (i) Arisawa, M.; Toma, H.;
Kita, Y. Yakugaku Zasshi 2000, 120, 1061. (j) Tohma, H.; Kita, Y. Top. Curr.
Chem. 2003, 224. Recent developments: (k) Berard, D.; Jean, A.; Canesi, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 8238. (l) Jean, A.; Cantat, J.; Berard, D.; Bouchu,
D.; Canesi, S. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2553.
(1) Ciufolini, M. A.; Braun, N. A.; Canesi, S.; Ousmer, M.; Chang, J.; Chai,
D. Synthesis 2007, 3759.
(2) Canesi, S.; Bouchu, D.; Ciufolini, M. A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 175.
(3) About $1000 for 500 g (Sigma-Aldrich).
(4) This is true also for other polar, aprotic solvents such as MeNO2, CH2Cl2,
etc. See ref 1 and literature cited therein.
(5) (a) Tamura, Y.; Yakura, T.; Haruta, J.; Kita, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52,
3927. (b) Kita, Y.; Tohma, H.; Kikuchi, K.; Inagaki, M.; Yakura, T. J. Org.
Chem. 1991, 56, 435. (c) Kita, Y.; Takada, T.; Tohma, H. Pure Appl. Chem.
1996, 68, 627. (d) Dohi, T.; Ito, M.; Morimoto, K.; Minamitsuji, Y.; Takenaga,
N.; Kita, Y. Chem. Commun. 2007, 4152.
(7) Drutu, I.; Njardarson, J. T.; Wood, J. L. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 493.
(8) Gram per gram, PIFA is about 3 times as costly as DIB, and more than
4 times as expensive on a molar basis.
10.1021/jo800267q CCC: $40.75
Published on Web 05/01/2008
2008 American Chemical Society
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4299–4301 4299