10.1002/anie.201903330
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
The three-component coupling is selective for carbonylative
cross-coupling of two different alkyl halides over carbonylative
homo-coupling of the same alkyl halides (entries 1-3, Table 1).
This selectivity is surprising because selective reductive cross-
coupling was typically achieved using two different types of
electrophiles, e.g., one alkyl halide and one aryl halide.[6d-f] Gong
and co-workers reported examples of selective reductive cross-
coupling of two alkyl halides, where the selectivity was partially
achieved by using 3 equiv. of one alkyl halide.[10] In the present
case, selectivity towards asymmetric dialkyl ketone was observed
even when the two alkyl halides were in equal amount (entry 2,
Table 1). To compare the reactivity of different alkyl halides, the
reaction profiles of three reactions were monitored: the
carbonylative cross-coupling reaction of 1a and 2a as in entry 2,
Table 1 and the carbonylative homo-coupling reactions of 1a or
2a alone (Figure S14-16, SI). Under identical conditions, the
primary alkyl iodide 1a reacted slightly faster than the secondary
alkyl iodide 2a. The rate of formation followed the following order:
3a > 4a > 4c. These observations might be explained by two
different activation processes of alkyl halides, one favoring
primary alkyl halide and one favoring secondary alkyl halides.
activation of an alkyl halide by the Ni0 CO species (IV) and the
subsequent CO insertion to give XII should be faster than the
activation of the second alkyl halide by an NiI species (e.g., IX). In
the former process, a primary alkyl halide might be more active
than a secondary alkyl halide due to sterics. In the later process,
a secondary alkyl halide might be more active than a primary alkyl
halide due to thermodynamics. The net result is the selectivity
towards an asymmetric dialkyl ketone product. Alternatively, the
insertion of CO into a secondary alkyl group is faster than the
analogous insertion into a primary alkyl group. The resulting acyl
species (VII) reacts faster with a primary alkyl radical than with a
secondary alkyl radical, which leads to the selectivity towards an
asymmetric dialkyl ketone product.
In conclusion, we have developed a nickel-catalyzed
reductive carbonylation method to synthesize a wide range of
both symmetric and asymmetric dialkyl ketones from readily
available alkyl halides and a safe CO source, ethyl chloroformate.
These carbonylation reactions occur under mild reaction
conditions and have broad scope and high functional group
tolerance. The method provides a valuable complement to
existing approaches in the synthesis of ketones, which are
ubiquitous synthetic intermediates and bio-active compounds.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation.
Keywords: ketone synthesis • reductive coupling • nickel
catalysis • carbonylation •alkyl halides
[1]
[2]
R. K. Dieter, Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 4177-4236.
a) D. Milstein, J. K. Stille, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 3636-3638; b)
E.-i. Negishi, V. Bagheri, S. Chatterjee, F.-T. Luo, J. A. Miller, A. T. Stoll,
Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 5181-5184; c) B. Scheiper, M. Bonnekessel,
H. Krause, A. Fürstner, J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3943-3949; d) H.
Tatamidani, F. Kakiuchi, N. Chatani, Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3597-3599; e) Y.
Yu, L. S. Liebeskind, J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3554-3557; f) Y. Zhang, T.
Rovis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15964-15965; g) Z. Zhang, M. G.
Lindale, L. S. Liebeskind, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6403-6410; h)
J. R. Schmink, S. W. Krska, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 19574-19577.
a) A. Brennführer, H. Neumann, M. Beller, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009,
48, 4114-4133; b) X.-F. Wu, H. Neumann, M. Beller, Chem. Soc. Rev.
2011, 40, 4986-5009; c) Q. Liu, H. Zhang, A. W. Lei, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2011, 50, 10788-10799; For selected examples of nickel-catalyzed
carbonylative coupling: d) Y. Hoshimoto, T. Ohata, Y. Sasaoka, M.
Ohashi, S. Ogoshi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 15877-15880; e) Y.
Hoshimoto, K. Ashida, Y. Sasaoka, R. Kumar, K. Kamikawa, X.
Verdaguer, A. Riera, M. Ohashi, S. Ogoshi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017,
56, 8206-8210; f) J. K. Vandavasi, X. Hua, H. B. Halima, S. G. Newman,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 15441-15445; g) T. L. Andersen, A. S.
Donslund, K. T. Neumann, T. Skrydstrup, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018,
57, 800-804.
[3]
Figure 3. Proposed mechanism.
According to the above results and considerations, we
propose a tentative mechanism (Figure 3). The Ni catalyst
precursor is reduced to NiI and Nio species by Zn. Oxidative
addition of ClCOOEt to Ni0 affords a NiII species II, which
undergoes decarbonylation to give a NiII carbonyl species III.
Reduction of III by Zn gives a Ni0 carbonyl species IV. Activation
of an alkyl halide by IV through a radical process[11] gives
eventually a NiII alkyl carbonyl intermediate VI, which upon CO
insertion forms a NiII acyl complex VII. Meanwhile in a separate
process a NiI species activates another alkyl halide to give an alky
radical, which can be trapped by VII to give a NiIII alkyl acyl
species VIII. Reductive elimination from the latter furnishes the
ketone product and regenerates a NiI species IX. Because we
observe little if any non-carbonylative alkyl-alkyl coupling, the
[4]
[5]
a) M. R. Netherton, G. C. Fu, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1525-1532;
b) A. C. Frisch, M. Beller, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 674-688; c)
V. B. Phapale, D. J. Cardenas, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1598-1607;
d) A. Rudolph, M. Lautens, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2656-2670;
e) X. Hu, Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 1867-1886.
a) S. D. Friis, R. H. Taaning, A. T. Lindhardt, T. Skrydstrup, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2011, 133, 18114-18117; b) P. Hermange, A. T. Lindhardt, R. H.
Taaning, K. Bjerglund, D. Lupp, T. Skrydstrup, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011,
133, 6061-6071; c) S. D. Friis, A. T. Lindhardt, T. Skrydstrup, Acc. Chem.
Res. 2016, 49, 594-605.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.