a catalytic version of the WoodwardÀPrevost reaction
employing LiBr as the catalyst, and the syn dioxygenation
products were obtained with high diastereoselectivities
in the presence of NaIO4 at a high temperature.9 Quite
recently, Tomkinson et al. reported an effective alkene syn
dihydroxylation with malonoyl peroxides, and most
of the products were obtained with excellent stereo-
selectivity.8,10a In recent years, there has been an increasing
interest in the area of oxidative transformations mediated
by hypervalent iodine reagents, owing to their good oxi-
dizing properties and availability.11 As one impor-
tant application, hypervalent iodine reagent mediated
alkene dioxygenation has been well developed recently.12
However, stoichiometric use of hypervalent iodine leads to
equimolecular amounts of aryl iodides as a waste and is
mostly castigated by synthetic chemists. To address this
issue, development of aryl iodide-based organocatalytic
transformations has attracted much attention.11b,13 In
these reactions, aryl iodides are oxidized to hypervalent
compounds, which then undergo oxidative reactions and
release the aryl iodides to achieve a catalytic pathway. We
envisioned that by employing an aryl iodide as a catalyst in
the presence of an oxidant we might be able to realize a
novel organocatalytic syn dioxygenation procedure for
alkenes.
iodobenzene (0.1 equiv) in the presence of H2O2 with
BF3 OEt2 as additive at room temperature, a good yield
3
of the dioxygenated product was obtained, though in low
diastereoselectivity (Table 1, entry 1). We inferred that the
anti products, arose from oxidation of the substrate by
peroxy compounds in two steps: epoxidation followed by a
ring-opening process.14 Further increasing of the loading
of iodobenzene did not provide significant improvement in
product yield and stereoselectivity. To our delight, oxida-
tion was achieved in good yield as well as diastereoselec-
tivity when the substrate was delivered slowly via syringe
pump over 12 h (Table 1, entry 3). Moreover, detailed
studies showed that employing TfOH12c as the additive
was more efficient than BF3 OEt212d,e under these circum-
3
stances (see the Supporting Information). Subsequently,
a series of aryl iodides bearing electron-withdrawing
(Table 1, entries 5 and 6) or electron-donating (Table 1,
entries 7À9) substituents were investigated, and the results
indicated that iodomesitylene served as the most efficient
catalyst for this transformation. The main reason for the
enhanced reactivity of iodomesitylene is attributed to this
aryl iodide with electron-donating groups being more
easily oxidized to form the reactive hypervalent iodine(III)
species, suppressing the unfavorable side reactions accord-
ingly. Furthermore, lower catalyst loading also furnished
the desired products in good yield, albeit with decreased
diastereoselectivities (Table 1, entries 11 and 12).
With this in mind, we began our studies with indene
as a model substrate. When indene was reacted with
(5) (a) Suzuki, K.; Oldenburg, P. D.; Que, L., Jr. Angew. Chem., Int.
ꢀ
Ed. 2008, 47, 1887. (b) Companye, A.; Gomez, L.; Fontrodona, X.;
Table 1. Optimization of Aryl Iodide Catalyzed Indene Diace-
toxylationa
Ribas, X.; Costas, M. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 5727. (c) Bruijnincx,
P. C. A.; Buurmans, I. L. C.; Gosiewska, S.; Moelands, M. A. H.; Lutz,
M.; Spek, A. L.; van Koten, G.; Klein Gebbink, R. J. M. Chem.;Eur.
J. 2008, 14, 1228. (d) Bautz, J.; Comba, P.; Lopez de Laorden, C.; Menzel,
M.; Rajaraman, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8067. (e) Chow,
T. W.-S.; W, E. L.-M.; Guo, Z.; Liu, Y.; Huang, J.-S.; Che, C.-M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13229. (f) Oldenburg, P. D.; Feng, Y.; Pryjomska-
Ray, I.; Ness, D.; Que, L., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 17713.
(6) (a) Li, Y.; Song, D.; Dong, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
2962. (b) Wang, A.; Jiang, H.; Chen, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
3846. (c) Wang, W.; Wang, F.; Shi, M. Organometallics 2010, 29, 928.
(d) Park, C. P.; Lee, J. H.; Yoo, K. S.; Jung, K. W. Org. Lett. 2010, 12,
2450. (e) Zhu, M.-K.; Zhao, J.-F.; Loh, T.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 6284. (f) Wang, A.; Jiang, H. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 2321.
(7) Santi et al. developed a novel olefin dihydroxylation catalyzed by
diphenyl diselenide, but the diastereoselectivity was dependent on the
substrate: Santoro, S.; Santi, C.; Sabatini, M.; Testaferri, L.; Tiecco, M.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 2881.
(8) Schwarz, M.; Reiser, O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10495.
(9) Emmanuvel, L.; Ali Shaikh, T. M.; Sudalai, A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
5071.
(10) Peroxide mediated dihydroxylation of alkenes: (a) Griffith,
J. C.; Jones, K. M.; Picon, S.; Rawling, M. J.; Kariuki, B. M.; Campbell,
M.; Tomkinson, N. C. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 14409. (b) Yuan,
C.; Axelrod, A.; Varela, M.; Danysh, L.; Siegel, D. Tetrahedron Lett.
2011, 52, 2540. (c) Jones, K. M.; Tomkinson, N. C. O. J. Org. Chem.
2012, 77, 921.
entry
catalyst (mol %)
PhI (10)
additive (mol %) yieldb (%)
drc
1
2
3d
4
BF3 OEt2 (10)
71
73
78
82
78
81
84
85
84
90
84
79
62
48
3.7:1
3.8:1
10:1
12.5:1
10:1
5.3:1
12.5:1
6.7:1
14:1
14:1
9:1
3
PhI (20)
BF3 OEt2 (10)
3
PhI (20)
BF3 OEt2 (10)
3
PhI (20)
TfOH (2)
TfOH (2)
TfOH (2)
TfOH (2)
TfOH (2)
5
4-IC6H4I (20)
4-ClC6H4I (20)
4-MeC6H4I (20)
4-MeOC6H4I (20)
6
7
8
9
2,4,6-Me3C6H2I (20) TfOH (2)
2,4,6-Me3C6H2I (20) TfOH (5)
2,4,6-Me3C6H2I (15) TfOH (5)
2,4,6-Me3C6H2I (10) TfOH (5)
10
11
12
13
14
6:1
e
TfOH (5)
e
2:1
(11) Recent reviews, see: (a) Wirth, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005,
44, 3656. (b) Richardson, R. D.; Wirth, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 4402. (c) Ochiai, M. Chem. Rec. 2007, 7, 12. (d) Zhdankin, V. V.;
Stang, P. J. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 5299. (e) Ochiai, M.; Miyamoto, K.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 4229. (f) Dohi, T.; Kita, Y. Chem. Commun.
2009, 2073. (g) Uyanik, M.; Ishihara, K. Chem. Commun. 2009, 2086.
2,4,6-Me3C6H2I (20)
3.3:1
a 1.0 mmol scale of 1a, 3.0 equiv of H2O2 (30%), 1.3 mL of Ac2O, 2.0
mL of AcOH, rt; then 3.0 mL of pyridine and 0.7 mL of Ac2O, rt.
b Isolated yield. c Determined by 1HNMR integration (syn/anti).
d Entries 3À14: 1a was added via syringe pump over 12 h. e Not added.
ꢀ
(h) Pouysegu, L.; Deffieux, D.; Quideau, S. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 2235.
(i) Zhdankin, V. V. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 1185.
(12) (a) Celik, M.; Alp, C.; Coskun, B.; Gultekin, M. S.; Balci, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 3659. (b) Shu, X.-Z.; Xia, X.-F.; Yang, Y.-F.;
Ji, K.-G.; Liu, X.-Y.; Liang, Y.-M. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 7464.
(c) Kang, Y.-B.; Gade, L. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3658. (d) Fujita,
M.; Wakita, M.; Sugimura, T. Chem. Commun. 2011, 3983. (e) Zhong, W.;
Yang, J.; Meng, X.; Li, Z. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 9997.
With the optimized conditions identified, we next ex-
plored the generality of this new procedure. As shown
in Scheme 2, a variety of terminal alkenes, including
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX