T. Narumi et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 4169–4172
4171
M)
Table 1
CXCR4-binding activity, anti-HIV activity and cytotoxicity of compounds 12–47
a
b
c
e
f
a
b
c
e
f
Compd no.
R1
R2
R3
Inhibitiond (%)
EC50
(
lM)
CC50
(lM)
Compd no.
R1
R2
R3
Inhibitiond (%)
EC50
(lM)
CC50
(l
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
i
i
i
i
i
i
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
iii
iii
iii
iii
iii
iii
(R)
(R)
(R)
(R)
(R)
(R)
(R)
(R)
(R)
(R)
(R)
(R)
(R)
(R)
(R)
(R)
(R)
(R)
A
B
C
D
E
F
A
B
C
D
E
F
A
B
C
D
E
F
0
1.7
0.7
>20
>4
35
23
37
n.d.
39
n.d.
38
41
45
n.d.
45
n.d.
n.d.
27
47
11
n.d.
n.d.
80
55
100
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
i
i
i
i
i
i
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
iii
iii
iii
iii
iii
iii
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
(S)
A
B
C
D
E
F
A
B
C
D
E
F
A
B
C
D
E
F
30 1.1
25 3.3
27 1.7
60 1.5
16 1.2
20 1.3
36 1.8
0
14 1.4
32 8.4
13 15
25 13
16 5.1
23 14
36 13
35 5.2
26 23
51 6.6
100
>4
11
24
41
65
44
44
37
43
57
n.d.
51
47
9.9
13
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
>10
66
4
6
>20
>20
13
8
10
>20
>20
>20
n.d.
>20
>20
>4
>20
n.d.
>20
n.d.
>20
>20
>20
n.d.
>20
n.d.
n.d.
>20
11
>11
n.d.
n.d.
0.33
0.062
0.058
24 1.7
12 3.0
16 2.2
0.9
3.9
11 0.8
22 4.1
3
6
6
2.7
12 1.9
15 2.1
13 0.6
79 14
69 5.0
44 5.4
0
>4
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
0.16
7.4
28
29
46
47
FC131
1 (ST34)
KRH-1636
AMD3100
AZT
100
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
a,c
The structures of R1 and R3 are shown in Fig. 2 as i–iii and A–F, respectively.
b
The absolute configuration in stereochemistry of R2 shown in Fig. 2 is described.
d
CXCR4-binding activity was assessed based on the inhibition of the [125I]-CXCL12 binding to Jurkat cells. Inhibition percentages of all the compounds at 10
lM were
calculated relative to the inhibition percentage by T140 (100%).
e
EC50 values are the concentrations for 50% protection from X4-HIV-1 (NL4-3 strain)-induced cytopathogenicity in MT-4 cells.
CC50 values are the concentrations for 50% reduction of the viability of MT-4 cells. All data are the mean values from at least three independent experiments.
f
significant anti-HIV activity at concentrations below 11
cause of high cytotoxicity (CC50 = 11 M). With the exception of
27, 30, 42 and 43, the tested compounds showed no significant
cytotoxicity (CC50 >20 M, Table 1). On the other hand, compounds
26, 27, 33, 34 and 35 at concentrations below 100 M failed to
l
M be-
and Technology of Japan, Japan Human Science Foundation, and
Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants from Japanese Minis-
try of Health, Labor, and Welfare. T.T. and C.H. are grateful for the
JSPS Research Fellowships for Young Scientists.
l
l
l
show significant protective activity against macrophage-tropic
(R5-) HIV-1 (NL(AD8) strain)-induced cytopathogenicity in
PM-1/CCR5, whereas the EC50 of the CCR5 antagonist SCH-D17 in
References and notes
1. (a) Nagasawa, T.; Kikutani, H.; Kishimoto, T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994,
91, 2305; (b) Bleul, C. C.; Farzan, M.; Choe, H.; Parolin, C.; Clark-Lewis, I.;
Sodroski, J.; Springer, T. A. Nature 1996, 382, 829; (c) Oberlin, E.; Amara, A.;
Bachelerie, F.; Bessia, C.; Virelizier, J. L.; Arenzana-Seisdedos, F.; Schwartz, O.;
Heard, J. M.; Clark-Lewis, I.; Legler, D. L.; Loetscher, M.; Baggiolini, M.; Moser, B.
Nature 1996, 382, 833; (d) Tashiro, K.; Tada, H.; Heilker, R.; Shirozu, M.;
Nakano, T.; Honjo, T. Science 1993, 261, 600.
this assay was 0.055 lM (data not shown). Since instead of CXCR4,
R5-HIV-1 strains use the chemokine receptor CCR5, a member of
the GPCR family, as the major co-receptor for their entry, this sug-
gests that these compounds do not bind to CCR5. Thus, compounds
26, 27, 33, 34 or 35 have highly selective affinity for CXCR4.
Compounds 34 and 35, which have significant anti-HIV activity,
2. Bleul, C. C.; Fuhlbrigge, R. C.; Casanovas, J. M.; Aiuti, A.; Springer, T. A. J. Exp.
Med. 1996, 2, 1101.
3. (a) Tachibana, K.; Hirota, S.; Iizasa, H.; Yoshida, H.; Kawabata, K.; Kataoka, Y.;
Kitamura, Y.; Matsushima, K.; Yoshida, N.; Nishikawa, S.; Kishimoto, T.;
Nagasawa, T. Nature 1998, 393, 591; (b) Nagasawa, T.; Hirota, S.; Tachibana,
K.; Takakura, N.; Nishikawa, S.; Kitamura, Y.; Yoshida, N.; Kikutani, H.;
Kishimoto, T. Nature 1996, 382, 635.
4. (a) Zhu, Y.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, X. C.; Nagasawa, T.; Wu, J. Y.; Rao, Y. Nat. Neurosci.
2002, 5, 719; (b) Stumm, R. K.; Zhou, C.; Ara, T.; Lazarini, F.; Dubois-Dalcq, M.;
Nagasawa, T.; Hollt, V.; Schulz, S. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 5123.
5. (a) Deng, H. K.; Liu, R.; Ellmeier, W.; Choe, S.; Unutmaz, D.; Burkhart, M.;
Marzio, P. D.; Marmon, S.; Sutton, R. E.; Hill, C. M.; Davis, C. B.; Peiper, S. C.;
Schall, T. J.; Littman, D. R.; Landau, N. R. Nature 1996, 381, 661; (b) Feng, Y.;
Broder, C. C.; Kennedy, P. E.; Berger, E. A. Science 1996, 272, 872.
6. (a) Koshiba, T.; Hosotani, R.; Miyamoto, Y.; Ida, J.; Tsuji, S.; Nakajima, S.;
Kawaguchi, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Doi, R.; Hori, T.; Fujii, N.; Imamura, M. Clin.
Cancer. Res. 2000, 6, 3530; (b) Müller, A.; Homey, B.; Soto, H.; Ge, N.; Catron, D.;
Buchanan, M. E.; McClanahan, T.; Murphy, E.; Yuan, W.; Wagner, S. N.; Barrera,
J. L.; Mohar, A.; Verastegui, E.; Zlotnik, A. Nature 2001, 410, 50; (c) Tamamura,
H.; Hori, A.; Kanzaki, N.; Hiramatsu, K.; Mizumoto, M.; Nakashima, H.;
Yamamoto, N.; Otaka, A.; Fujii, N. FEBS Lett. 2003, 550, 79.
have a pyridyl group with a nitrogen atom at the
c-position, in
contrast to compounds 26, 27 and 33 which also show CXCR4-
binding activity, but have a pyridyl group with a nitrogen atom
at the b-position. Furthermore, compounds 34 and 35 have
R1 = 4-fluorobenzyl and R2 = (S)-1-naphthylethylamine. A possible
explanation of these observations is that compounds 34 and 35
compete with HIV-1 in binding to CXCR4 while compounds 26
and 33 compete with HIV-1 and CXCL12. Compound 27 does not
compete with HIV-1 because of its high cytotoxicity. This suggests
that the CXCR4 binding site used by compounds 34 and 35 differs
slightly from that used by compounds 26, 27 and 33.
Low molecular weight CXCR4 ligands with two types of recog-
nition modes for CXCR4 have been obtained in this study: one
causes competition with HIV-1 on CXCR4 whereas the other causes
competition with HIV-1 and CXCL12. These compounds have selec-
tive affinity for CXCR4 because they do not significantly bind to
CCR5. Further structural modification studies of these CXCR4
ligands are the subject of an ongoing project.
7. (a) Tsukada, N.; Burger, J. A.; Zvaifler, N. J.; Kipps, T. J. Blood 2002, 99, 1030; (b)
Juarez, J.; Bradstock, K. F.; Gottlieb, D. J.; Bendall, L. J. Leukemia 2003, 17, 1294.
8. (a) Nanki, T.; Hayashida, K.; EI-Gabalawy, H. S.; Suson, S.; Shi, K.; Girschick, H.
J.; Yavuz, S.; Lipsky, P. E. . J. Immunol. 2000, 165, 6590; (b) Tamamura, H.;
Fujisawa, M.; Hiramatsu, K.; Mizumoto, M.; Nakashima, H.; Yamamoto, N.;
Otaka, A.; Fujii, N. FEBS Lett. 2004, 569, 99.
9. (a) Murakami, T.; Nakajima, T.; Koyanagi, Y.; Tachibana, K.; Fujii, N.;
Tamamura, H.; Toshida, N.; Waki, M.; Matsumoto, A.; Yoshie, O.; Kishimoto,
T.; Yamamoto, N.; Nagasawa, T. J. Exp. Med. 1997, 186, 1389; (b) Tamamura, H.;
Xu, Y.; Hattori, T.; Zhang, X.; Arakaki, R.; Kanbara, K.; Omagari, A.; Otaka, A.;
Ibuka, T.; Yamamoto, N.; Nakashima, H.; Fujii, N. Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science,