K.K. Reddy et al. / Food Chemistry 134 (2012) 2201–2207
2203
was evaporated at 55 °C using a rotary evaporator and the residue
was solubilised in ethyl acetate. The organic phase was washed
successively with saturated sodium bicarbonate (2 ꢀ 50 mL), brine
(2 ꢀ 50 mL), water (2 ꢀ 50 mL), and finally dried over anhydrous
sodium sulphate. The organic solvent was evaporated at 55 °C
using a rotary evaporator to obtain the crude product, which was
purified by column chromatography using hexane/ethyl acetate
(90/10; v/v) to get the desired compounds. Spectral characteristic
of the four synthesised compounds are given below:
as reference and their concentrations were kept the same as that of
the synthesised phenolic lipids. The free radical-scavenging activ-
ity (FRSA in %) of the tested samples was evaluated by comparison
with a control (2 mL of DPPH radical solution and 1 mL of metha-
nol). Each sample was measured in triplicate and averaged. The
FRSA was calculated using the formula:
FRSA ¼ ½ðAc ꢁ AsÞ=Acꢂ ꢀ 100
where Ac is the absorbance of the control and As is the absorbance of
the tested sample after 40 min.
Methyl-12-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl propenoate)octadec-9-
en-1-oate (compound 1): Light yellow oil (yield 58%); 1H NMR
(CDCl3, 200 MHz): d (ppm): 0.87 (t, 3H, J = 7.39 Hz), 1.28 (m,
16H), 1.54–1.69 (m, 4H), 1.97–2.10 (m, 2H), 2.23–2.42 (m, 4H),
3.66 (s, 3H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 4.93–5.08 (m, 1H), 5.30–5.56 (m, 2H),
5.92 (s, 1H), 6.28 (d, 1H, J = 16.42 Hz), 6.91 (d, 1H, J = 8.21 Hz),
7.02–7.13 (m, 2H), 7.60 (d, 1H, J = 16.42 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3,
75 MHz): d (ppm): 14.0, 22.6, 24.9, 25.4, 27.3, 29.1, 29.2, 29.5,
31.7, 32.0, 33.7, 34.0, 51.4, 55.9, 73.9, 109.2, 114.7, 115.9, 122.9,
124.2, 127.0, 132.6, 144.5146.7, 148.9, 166.9, 174.3; HRMS calcu-
lated for C29H44O6Na [M+Na]+ 511.3035, found 511.3015; EI MS
(m/z): 488 (M+ꢀ).
Methyl-12-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzoate)octadec-9-en-1-oate
(compound 2): Light yellow oil (yield, 52%); 1H NMR (CDCl3,
300 MHz): d (ppm): 0.79 (t, 3H, J = 6.79 Hz), 1.18 (m, 16H),
1.47–1.64 (m, 4H), 1.91–1.99 (m, 2H), 2.22 (t, 2H, J = 7.74 Hz),
2.29–2.43 (m, 2H), 3.59 (s, 3H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 4.98–5.09 (m, 1H),
5.28–5.44 (m, 2H), 6.04 (br s, 1H), 6.85 (d, 1H, J = 8.31 Hz), 7.48
(s, 1H), 7.56 (d, 1H, J = 8.31 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): d
(ppm): 14.0, 22.5, 24.9, 25.4, 27.3, 29.0, 29.1, 29.5, 31.7, 32.0,
33.7, 34.0, 51.4, 56.0, 74.4, 111.8, 113.9, 122.9, 123.9, 124.2,
132.6, 146.1, 149.8, 166.0, 174.3; HRMS calculated for C27H42O6Na
[M+Na]+ 485.2879, found 485.2860; EI MS (m/z): 462 (M+ꢀ).
Methyl-12-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl propenoate)octadecan-
1-oate (compound 3): Light yellow oil (49.2%); 1H NMR (CDCl3,
300 MHz): d (ppm): 0.88 (t, 3H, J = 7.55 Hz), 1.26 (m, 22H), 1.51–
1.62 (m, 6H), 2.26 (t, 2H, J = 7.55 Hz), 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.92 (s, 3H),
4.91–4.99 (m, 1H), 5.92 (br s, 1H), 6.23 (d, 1H, J = 15.86 Hz), 6.87
(d, 1H, J = 8.31 Hz), 6.99–7.08 (m, 2H), 7.54 (d, 1H, J = 15.86 Hz);
13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): d (ppm): 13.8, 22.4, 24.7, 25.1, 28.9,
29.0, 29.1, 29.3, 29.5, 31.5, 33.8, 34.1, 51.2, 55.6, 74.1, 109.2,
114.7, 115.6, 122.8, 126.7, 144.4, 146.8, 147.9, 167.0, 174.1. HRMS
calculated for C29H46O6Na [M+Na]+ 513.3192, found 513.3180. EI
MS (m/z): 490 (M+ꢀ).
2.4.2. DSC measurements
The antioxidant activity was also evaluated by differential
scanning calorimeter (DSC), using pure linoleic acid as a lipid model
system (Gaspar et al., 2010; Reis et al., 2010). All the studied antiox-
idants were taken in methanol to prepare a 1 mM solution. Samples
of linoleic acid (2.5–3.0 mg) were placed in standard aluminium
pans and spiked with 10
lL of the antioxidant solution. A blank
run of linoleic acid, spiked with 10
lL of methanol was also carried
out simultaneously to find the oxidative induction temperature
(OIT) of linoleic acid. OIT is determined from the first exothermal
peak of the plot of heat flow (mW/g) vs. temperature. All the mea-
surements for each antioxidant were run in triplicate.
2.4.3. Autoxidation of linoleic acid in Tween 20 micellar system
The rate of inhibition of autoxidation of linoleic acid in micelle
by antioxidant was measured according to the method of Chimi,
Cillard, Cillard, and Rahmani (1991) with some modifications. Lin-
oleic acid (2.5 ꢀ 10ꢁ3 M) was dispersed with 0.5% Tween 20 in
phosphate buffer at pH 6.9 containing 1 mM concentration of ref-
erence antioxidants (a-tocopherol, dodecyl gallate and BHT) or
synthesised phenolic lipids. Samples were left in the dark and in
air for 5 days at 50 °C. Samples without reference and the synthes-
ised antioxidants and the controls without linoleic acid were also
incubated under the same conditions. The autoxidation of linoleic
acid is accompanied by the generation of conjugated diene, which
was measured by UV at 234 nm. Samples were diluted twenty
times with phosphate buffer before measuring the absorbance. A
decrease in the rate of formation of conjugated diene indicates
the increased antioxidant activity of the compound added to the
micelle of linoleic acid.
2.5. Antibacterial activity
Methyl-12-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzoate)octadecan-1-oate
(compound 4): Light yellow oil (50.8%); 1H NMR (CDCl3,
300 MHz): d (ppm): 0.85 (t, 3H, J = 6.79 Hz), 1.24 (m, 22H), 1.51–
1.65 (m, 6H), 2.24 (t, 2H, J = 7.55 Hz), 3.62 (s, 3H), 3.93 (s, 3H),
4.99–5.08 (m, 1H), 6.13 (br s, 1H), 6.86 (d, 1H, J = 8.31 Hz), 7.49
(s, 1H), 7.57 (d, 1H, J = 8.31 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): d
(ppm): 14.1, 22.6, 24.9, 25.3, 25.6, 29.1, 29.2, 29.4, 29.5, 29.7,
31.7, 31.9, 33.9, 34.3, 37.5, 51.2, 55.8, 74.3, 111.8, 114.1, 122.6,
123.9, 146.1150.0, 165.7, 173.5; HRMS calculated for C27H44O6Na
[M+Na]+ 487.3035, found 487.3025; EI MS (m/z): 464 (M+ꢀ).
The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of synthesised
phenolic lipocojugates were tested against three representative
Gram-positive organisms, Bacillus subtilis (MTCC 441), Staphylococ-
cus aureus (MTCC 96), Staphylococcus epidermidis (MTCC 2639) and
Gram-negative organisms Escherichia coli (MTCC 443), Pseudomo-
nas aeruginosa (MTCC 741), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (MTCC
618) by broth dilution method recommended by National Commit-
tee for Clinical Laboratory (NCCL, 2000) standards. Standard anti-
bacterial agents like Penicillin and Streptomycin were also
screened under identical conditions for comparison.
2.4. Antioxidant activity assays
2.6. Antifungal activity
2.4.1. DPPH radical scavenging assay
The antioxidant activity was determined by the radical-scav-
enging ability using the stable radical DPPH (Akowuah, Zhari, Nor-
hayati, & Mariam, 2006). Briefly, 200 lL of methanolic solution of
the synthesised phenolic lipoconjugates (0.5, 1 and 2 mM) were
added to 2 mL of methanolic solution of DPPH radical (0.1 mM)
and total volume was made up to 3 mL with methanol. After
40 min incubation at 30 °C in the dark, the absorbance of the mix-
ture was measured at 517 nm against methanol as blank. Ferulic
In vitro antifungal activity of the synthesised phenolic lipocoju-
gates was studied against selected fungal strains namely, Candida
albicans (MTCC 227), Candida rugosa (NCIM 3462), Saccharomyces
cerevisiae (MTCC 36), Rhizopus oryzae (MTCC 262), Aspergillus niger
(MTCC 282) by agar well diffusion method. The ready-made potato
dextrose agar (PDA) medium (Hi-media, 39 g) was suspended in
distilled water (1000 mL) and heated to boiling until it dissolved
completely. The medium and petri dishes were autoclaved at a
pressure of 15 psi (Linday, 1962) for 20 min. The medium was
acid, vanillic acid, a-tocopherol, dodecyl gallate and BHT were used