D. Chanti Babu et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 3633–3636
3635
AcO
O
3
a
O
16
1
(10%)
+
O
b
19 (55%)
O
O
HO
TBSO
18
O
O
O
O
O
3
3
d
O
O
c
O
O
17
1
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) FeCl3, acetyl acetone, toluene, reflux, 24 h, 65%; (b) HCl, methanol, rt, 93%; (c) TBSCl, imidizole, rt, 3 h, 93%; (d) (i) K2CO3, methanol,
reflux 3 h; (ii) THF/acetyl chloride 8 h; (iii) HCl, methanol, rt, overall yield 70%.
such as p-TSA in dry THF at reflux condition,18e dehydromesyla-
Acknowledgments
tion21, and dehydrohalozenation.22 Interestingly, when compound
7 reacted with 11 N HCl in ethanol,23 it afforded undesired com-
The authors D.C., C.B.R., D.R., and K.R. are thankful to the UGC
pound 8. The attempts were therefore abandoned. Then, to over-
come the first impediment toward the synthesis of 1, the aldehyde
6 was converted into the terminal alkene 9 using Wittig reaction
with methyltriphenylphosphonium bromide salt in the presence
of tert-BuOK, which was subjected to cross metathesis reaction24
with 1-heptene by using Grubbs 2nd generation catalyst in CH2Cl2
to afford the E-olefin 10 along with by product 10b (trans dimer of
9). E-Olefin 10 was subjected to Sharpless dihydroxylation25 with
b-AD-mix to afford 11 in 95% yield, which was modified as an aceto-
nide compound 12 with 2, 2 DMP in dry DCM and p-TSA as catalyst.
The removal of benzyl protecting group in compound 12 was
unsuccessful to give alcohol 14, with Li/naphthalene reaction.
When compound 12 was subjected to hydrogenation in the pres-
ence of palladium catalysts like palladium(II) acetate, palladium
hydroxide, and palladium–carbon in various solvents (ethyl ace-
tate, ethanol and methanol) at either reflux or room temperature
conditions at hydrogen atmosphere afforded compound 13. Com-
pound 12 was subjected to hydrogenation in the presence of Raney
nickel in ethanol at reflux condition also yielded compound 13 but,
fortunately at room temperature afforded alcohol 14. Thus, alcohol
14 was oxidized to aldehyde 15 using IBX in DMSO, which was
immediately further oxidized to acid 16 by treating with NaClO2/
NaH2PO4.
and CSIR, New Delhi for the financial support and thankful to the
Director J. S. Yadav, IICT for his constant encouragement.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (experimental procedures and data for rep-
resentative new compounds) associated with this article can be
References and notes
1. Wong, Z. W.; Ellis, M. J. Br. J. Cancer 2004, 90, 20–25.
2. Milla-Santos, A.; Milla, L.; Portella, J.; Rallo, L.; Pons, M.; Rodes, E.; Casanovas, J.;
Puig-Gali, M. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003, 26, 317–322.
3. Arora, A.; Potter, J. F. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2004, 52, 611–616.
4. Goss, P. E. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 1999, 6, 325–332.
5. Cragg, G. M.; Grothaus, P. G.; Newman, D. J. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 3012–3043.
6. Hartwell, J. L. Plants Used Against Cancer: A SurVey; Quarterman: Lawrence, MA,
1982.
7. (a) Kingston, D. G. I. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 507–515; (b) Newman, D. J.; Cragg, G.
M. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 461–477; (c) Butler, M. S. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005, 22, 162–
195; (d) Clardy, J.; Walsh, C. Nature 2004, 432, 829–837; (e) Altmann, K.-H.;
Gertsch, J. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007, 24, 327–357; (f) Paterson, I.; Anderson, E. A.
Science 2005, 310, 451–453; (g) Kingston, D. G. I.; Newman, D. J. IDrugs 2005, 8,
990–992; (h) Butler, M. S. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2008, 25, 475–516.
8. Cragg, G. M.; Boyd, M. R.; Cardellina, J. H., II; Newman, D. J.; Snader, K. M.;
McCloud, T. G. In Ciba Foundation Symposium 185: Ethnobotony and the Search
for New Drugs; Chadwick, D. J., Marsh, J., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: New York,
1994; p 178.
9. (a) Gueritte, F.; Fahy, J. In Cragg, G. M., Kingston, D. G. I., Newman, D. J., Eds.;
Anticancer Agents from Natural Products; CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL, 2005;
p 123; (b) Newmann, D. J.; Cragg, G. M.; Snader, K. M. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2000, 17,
215–234; (c) Kingston, D. G.; Newman, D. J. Curr. Opin. Drug Discuss. Dev. 2002,
5, 304–316; (d) Breinbauer, R.; Vetter, I. R.; Waldmann, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 2878–2890.
10. (a) Hall, D. G.; Manku, S.; Wang, F. J. Comb. Chem. 2001, 3, 125–150; (b) Arya, P.;
Joseph, R.; Chou, D. T. H. Chem. Biol. 2002, 9, 145–156; (c) Arya, P.; Baek, M.-G.
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2001, 5, 292–301; (d) Breinbauer, R.; Manger, M.; Scheck,
M.; Waldmann, H. Curr. Med. Chem. 2002, 9, 2129–2145.
11. Yet, L. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 4283–4306.
12. Gormley, N. A.; Orphanides, G.; Meyer, A.; Cullis, P. M.; Maxwell, A.
Biochemistry 1996, 35, 5083–5092.
13. Gilbert, E. J.; Maxwell, A. Mol. Microbiol. 1994, 12, 365–373.
14. Nair, V.; Prabhakaran, J.; George, T. G. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 15061–15068.
15. Guimarães, K. G.; Souza Filho, J. D.; Mares-Guia, T. R.; Braga, F. C.
Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 439–444.
16. Endringer, D. C.; Guimarães, K. G.; Kondratyuk, T. P.; Pezzuto, J. M.; Braga, F. C.
J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 1082–1084.
At this juncture, target molecule 1 was obtained from acid 16, via
a tandem deacetonide/aceylation, using FeCl3 and acetyl acetone in
benzene at reflux.26 Although, the tandem reaction occurred, the
yield of the desired compound 1 only 10% and the major product
19 in 55% yield was obtained (Scheme 3). Increase in the dilution
and time of addition did not give compound 1 as major product.
In a different route, the acid 16 was converted into lactone 17 by
using HCl in methanol. The reactive secondary hydroxyl group in
lactone 17 was temporarily protected as TBS ether 18. Now, in
sequential reactions lactone opening, acetylation, and re-lactoniza-
tion of 18 were carried out in three-step-one-pot fashion without
isolation of intermediates to obtain compound 1 (Scheme 3).
Accordingly, the TBS ether 18 was reacted with K2CO3 in methanol,
followed by reaction with acetyl chloride in THF and finally reaction
with HCl in methanol afforded compound 1 in 70% yield. The phys-
ical {½a 2D5
ꢀ65 (c 0.033, CHCl3)} and spectroscopic data were found
ꢁ
to be identical with the reported natural product.16
In conclusion, we have reported the total synthesis of the bio-
logically active dihydroisocoumarin (1) with 92.4 (ee), with overall
16% yield and very high selectivity has been observed in the con-
struction of the six membered lactone.
17. Fujita, M.; Yoshida, Y.; Miyata, K.; Wakisaka, A.; Sugimura, T. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2010, 49, 7068–7071.
18. (a) Babu, D. C.; Selavam, J. J. P.; Reddy, D. K.; Shekhar, V.; Venkateswarlu, Y.
Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 3815–3819; (b) Reddy, D. K.; Rajesh, K.; Shekhar, V.;
Babu, D. C.; Venkateswarlu, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 5440–5442; (c)