2604
A. L. Korich, T. S. Hughes
LETTER
Table 2 Effect of Acid Type and Concentration on Imine Formation
good to excellent yields with no purification required.
This process is facile, inexpensive, and environmentally
friendly.
Entry
Acid
Amount of acid
6 equiv, 0.19 M
10 equiv, 0.30 M
20 equiv, 0.60 M
0
Yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
HCl
88
90
82
0
HCl
Typical Procedure
HCl (0.13 mL, 4.5 mmol) was added to a mixture of nitrobenzene
(0.073 mL, 0.72 mmol), benzaldehyde (0.074 mL, 0.72 mmol), and
iron powder (0.409 g, 7.32 mmol) in 24 mL of EtOH–H2O (2:1 v/v)
solution. The reaction was heated to 65 °C for 1.5 h before being
filtered while hot. The filtrate was extracted using CH2Cl2 (2 × 20
mL) after which the organic layers were combined, dried over
MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to yield 0.115 g (88%)
of the desired diphenylimine.
HCl
None
HNO3
H2SO4
MeCO2H
6 equiv, 0.19 M
6 equiv, 0.19 M
6 equiv, 0.19 M
77
40
52
Changing the amount of the iron species as well as its
oxidation state affected the efficiency of the reaction
(Table 3). One equivalent of iron in the reaction mixture
yielded only starting material. However, when greater
than six equivalents of iron were used, only the desired
Acknowledgment
We would like to thank the University of Vermont for financial sup-
port of this research.
product was observed. It should be noted that when more References
than 10 equivalents are used, the isolation of products is
laborious. Such reaction conditions require the reaction
mixture to be centrifuged prior to gravity filtration.
(1) Akazome, M.; Kondo, T.; Watanabe, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 3375.
(2) (a) Gimenez, R.; Oriol, L.; Pinol, M.; Serrano, J. L.;
Vinuales, A. I.; Fisher, T.; Stumpe, J. Helv. Chim. Acta
2006, 89, 304. (b) Hari, A.; Karan, C.; Rodrigues, W. C.;
Miller, B. L. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 991.
Table 3 Schiff Base Formation between Nitrobenzene and Benz-
aldehyde Using Various Iron Species and Equivalents
(3) Nonkunsarn, P.; Ramsden, C. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 3805.
(4) Neuvonen, H.; Neuvonen, K.; Fülöp, F. J. Chem. Soc. 2006,
71, 3141.
(5) (a) Higuchi, M.; Tsuruta, M.; Chiba, H.; Shiki, S.;
Yamamoto, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9988.
(b) Higuchi, M.; Shomura, R.; Ohtsuka, Y.; Hayashi, A.;
Yamamoto, K.; Kurth, D. G. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4723.
(c) Borisova, N. E.; Reshetova, M. D.; Ustynyuk, Y. A.
Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 46.
Entry
Iron species
Fe(0)
Equiv
10
6
Yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
88
69
0
Fe(0)
Fe(0)
1
Fe(0)
20
10
10
78
0
(6) (a) Iqbal, A. F. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 2791. (b) Macho,
V.; Králik, M.; Hudec, J.; Cingelova, J. J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem. 2004, 209, 69.
FeCl2
FeCl3
0
(7) (a) Mendenhall, D.; Smith, P. A. S. Org. Synth., Coll. Vol. V
1979, 829. (b) Sundberg, R. J.; Pitts, W. J. J. Org. Chem.
1991, 56, 3048. (c) Doxsee, K. M.; Feigel, M.; Stewart, K.
D.; Canary, J. W.; Knobler, C. D.; Cram, D. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1987, 109, 3098. (d) Saramh, P.; Barua, N.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 4065.
(8) (a) Wang, L.; Li, P.; Wu, Z.; Yan, J.; Wang, M.; Ding, Y.
Synthesis 2003, 2001. (b) Fox, B. A.; Threlfall, T. L. Org.
Synth., Coll. Vol. V 1973, 346.
When Fe0 was replaced with either FeCl2 or FeCl3, no re-
action was observed. Since the reduction of nitroarenes to
the corresponding anilines is a six-electron process in to-
tal, under these reaction conditions it is not surprising that
FeCl3 yields only starting material. Ferrous chloride is not
a strong enough reducing agent to reduce nitrobenzene to
aniline in aqueous acid. The redox couple for Fe3+ to Fe2+
is +0.77 versus a SHE while Fe2+ to Fe0 is –0.447 versus
SHE, thus allowing for the reduction in the presence of
Fe0 and not Fe2+.11 No attempt was made to identify the
iron species at the conclusion of the reaction, and there
was no evidence that chelation of any iron species cata-
lyzed or inhibited the condensation of the aldehyde and
aniline, although we cannot rule out these possibilities.
(9) (a) Merlic, C. G.; Motamed, S.; Quinn, B. J. Chem. Soc.
1995, 60, 3365. (b) Stefancich, G.; Artico, M.; Massa, S.;
Corelli, F. Synthesis 1981, 321.
(10) For spectroscopic data on entries 1, 3, 4, 7–9, see ref. 3, for
entry 2, see: (a) Bolognese, A.; Diurno, A. V.; Mazzoni, O.;
Giordano, F. Tetrahedron 1997, 47, 1991. (b) For entry 5,
see: Tabei, K.; Saitou, E. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1969, 42,
1440. (c) For entry 6, see: Marshall, R. L.; Muderawan, I.
W.; Young, D. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2000, 957.
(d) For entry 10, see: Afarinkia, K. J.; Rees, C. W.
Tetrahedron 1997, 46, 7175.
In conclusion, we have developed a facile one-pot method
for preparing diarylimines from nitroarenes and arylalde-
hydes. A tandem nitroarene reduction and in situ Schiff
base condensation yielded substituted diarylimines in
(11) Milazzo, G.; Caroli, S. Table of Standard Electrode
Potentials; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1978.
Synlett 2007, No. 16, 2602–2604 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York