3962
C.-H. Chen et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 3959–3962
12. von Itzstein, M.; Wu, W. Y.; Kok, G. B.; Pegg, M. S.; Dyason, J. C.; Jin, B.; Phan, T.
V.; Smythe, M. L.; White, H. F.; Oliver, S. W.; Colman, P. M.; Varghese, J. N.;
Ryan, D. M.; Woods, J. M.; Bethell, R. C.; Hotham, V. J.; Cameron, J. M.; Penn, C.
R. Nature 1993, 363, 418–423.
13. Yellol, G. S.; Chung, T. W.; Sun, C. M. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 9170–9172.
14. Kemp, J. E. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.;
Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 7, p 469513.
15. (a) Drake, B.; Patek, M.; Lebl, M. Synthesis 1994, 579–582; (b) Yu, Y.; Ostresh, J.
M.; Houghten, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3138–3141; (c) Santana, A. G.;
Francisco, C. G.; Suárez, E.; González, C. C. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 5371–5374;
(d) Zapf, C. W.; Creighton, C. J.; Tomioka, M.; Goodman, M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
1133–1136.
an alternate method for the alkylation of protected guanidines
from those currently utilized. In addition, the need for stoichiome-
tric amounts of costly reactive coupling reagents is circumvented.
An attractive feature of this methodology is that few byproducts
are generated and at the end of the reaction, simple workup fol-
lowed by filtration gives high yields of the desired products. The
efficiency of parallel synthesis was greatly enhanced by combining
the advantages of microwave synthesis and a soluble polymer
support.
16. Powell, D. A.; Ramsden, P. D.; Batey, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 2300–2309.
17. (a) Feichtinger, K.; Sings, H. L.; Baker, T. J.; Matthews, K.; Goodman, M. J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 8432–8439; (b) Vaidyanathan, G.; Zalutsky, M. R. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 4867–4869.
18. Moseley, J. D.; Kappe, C. O. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 794–806.
19. Sauvagnat, B.; Lamaty, F.; Lazaro, R.; Martinez, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
6371–6375.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the National Science Council of Taiwan for
the financial assistance and the authorities of the National Chiao
Tung University for providing the laboratory facilities. This Letter
is particularly supported by ‘Aim for the Top University Plan’ of
the National Chiao Tung University and Ministry of Education,Tai-
wan, ROC.
20. Musiol, H.; Moroder, L. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3859–3861.
21. General procedures for synthesis of 6: (All microwave experiments performed in
CEM discover microwave system at the frequency of 2450 Hz and 0–300 W
power in open vessel system.) The polymer support (PEG 5000; 10.0 g,
1.0 equiv, 2.0 mmol) in toluene (25 mL) was treated with 4-(chloromethyl)
benzoyl chloride 1 (567.0 mg, 1.5 equiv, 3.0 mmol) in toluene (25 mL) and
pyridine (791.0 mg, 5.0 equiv, 10.0 mmol) under microwave irradiation at
200 W for 10 min to afford amide 2. The reaction mixture was diluted with
slow addition of excess cold ether (50 mL). The precipitated amide conjugate
was filtered through a fritted funnel, washed with ether, and then dried.
Piperazine (4.31 g, 5.0 equiv, 50.0 mmol) or Homopiperazine (5.01 g, 5.0 equiv,
50.0 mmol) were added to a solution of 2 (10.31 g, 1.0 equiv, 2.0 mmol) in
dichloromethane. The reaction mixture was stirred under microwave
irradiation at 120 W for 5 min and after completion; the reaction mixture
was passed through a thin layer of celite to remove salt. The solution was
concentrated by rotary evaporation and diluted with slow addition of an excess
of cold ether. The precipitated conjugate was filtered through a fritted funnel
and washed with ether to afford 3. N,N0-di-tert-butoxycarbonyl-1H-
benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole-1-carboximidamide (0.47 g, 1.3 equiv, 1.3 mmol) was
added to a solution of 3 (5.20 g, 1.0 equiv, 1.0 mmol) in dichloromethane
(30 mL). After stirring for 10 min, triethylamine (0.30 g, 3.0 equiv, 3.0 mmol)
was added and it was treated under microwave irradiations at 150 W for
7 min. The solution was concentrated by rotary evaporation and diluted with
slow addition of an excess of cold ether. The precipitated guanidine conjugate
was filtered through a fritted funnel and washed with ether to afford 4. To a
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
References and notes
1. (a) Hewlett, N. M.; Tepe, J. J. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4550–4553; (b) Iwamoto, O.;
Nagasawa, K. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2150–2153.
2. Castagnolo, D.; Schenone, S.; Botta, M. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 5247–5300.
3. Arndt, H. D.; Koert, U. Org. Synth. Highlights IV 2000, 241–250. and references
contained therein.
4. Laville, R.; Thomas, O. P.; Berrue, F.; Marquez, D.; Vacelet, J.; Amade, P. J. Nat.
Prod. 2009, 72, 1589–1594.
5. Hua, H. M.; Peng, J.; Fronczek, F. R.; Kelly, M.; Hamann, M. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2004, 12, 6461–6464.
6. Chang, L.; Whittaker, N. F.; Bewley, C. A. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 1490–
1494.
7. Hua, H. M.; Peng, J.; Dunbar, D. C.; Schinazi, R. F.; De Castro Andrews, A. G.;
Cuevas, C.; Garcia-Fernandes, L. F.; Kelly, M.; Hamann, M. T. Tetrahedron 2007,
63, 11179–11188.
8. Aoki, S.; Kong, D.; Matsui, K.; Kobayashi, M. Anticancer Res. 2004, 24, 2325–
2330.
9. Llewellyn, L. E. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006, 23, 200–222.
10. Capon, R. J.; Rooney, F.; Murray, L. M.; Collins, E.; Sim, A. T. R.; Rostas, J. A. P.;
Butler, M. S.; Carrol, A. R. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 660–662.
11. (a) Aron, Z. D.; Pietraszkiewicz, H.; Overman, L. E.; Valeriote, F.; Cuevas, C.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 3445–3449; (b) Patil, A. D.; Kumar, N. V.;
Kokke, W. C.; Bean, M. F.; Freyer, A. J.; De Brosse, C.; Mai, S.; Truneh, A.;
Faulkner, D. J.; Carte, B.; Breen, A. L.; Hertzberg, R. P.; Johnson, R. K.; Westley, J.
W.; Potts, B. C. M. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1182–1188; (c) Patil, A. D.; Freyer, A. J.;
Taylor, P. B.; Carté, B.; Zuber, G.; Johnson, R. K.; Faulkner, D. J. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 1814–1819.
solution of
4 (1.09 g, 1.0 equiv, 0.2 mmol) and alkyl halide (3.0 equiv,
0.6 mmol) in dichloromethane (10 mL) under nitrogen, sodium hydride
(0.024 g, 5.0 equiv, 1.0 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was
stirred at 0 °C for 3 h. After completion, the reaction mixture was washed
with cold ether. The precipitate was filtered and dried well to furnish the PEG
bound quanidine 5 in excellent yield. To a solution of 5 in methanol (10 mL),
KCN (0.1 g) was added and stirred for 48 h. After the quenching procedure, the
crude products 6 were obtained. The filtrate was dried and subjected to HPLC
analysis which depicts high purity. The title compounds 6 were obtained in
good to excellent overall yield after column chromatography purification.
Compound 6e: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.91 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.81 (m, 4H),
7.49 (m, 3H), 7.17 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 5.25 (b, 1H), 3.89 (m, 4H), 3.07 (m, 6H),
2.63 (b, 2H), 2.05 (b, 2H), 1.55 (s, 9H), 1.48 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) d
167.3, 160.0, 154.1, 152.8, 134.2, 133.7, 133.4, 130.0, 129.3, 129.1, 128.8, 128.4,
128.0, 127.7, 126.7, 126.6, 115.8, 115.0, 82.3, 79.9, 62.6, 52.5, 51.4, 28.8, 28.6;
IR (neat): 2922, 2851, 1721; MS (FAB-MS) m/z: 617 (M+H)+; HRMS : calcd for
C
35H44N4O6 m/z : 616.3261; found 617.3341 (M+H)+.