5
Fig
4
Reusability of [Nbmd][OH] ionic liquid in 2,3-
References and notes
Dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-ones synthesis
1. DeSimone, R. W.; Currie, K. S.; Mitchell, S. A.; Darrow, J. W.;
Plausible reaction mechanism
Pippin, D. A. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening, 2004, 7,
473.
Based on the above experimental findings and literature
report [15,27] a plausible reaction mechanism has been proposed
as shown in Scheme 3. The mechanism involves one
[Nbdm][OH] molecule with two basic sites reacting with two
carbonyl compounds and two 2-aminoenzonitriles to form two
molecules of Schiff base intermediate. Then the two hydroxide
ions of [Nbdm][OH] attack the electrophilic carbon atom of
nitrile (two mocecules) which converts the nitrile group to an
amide group. In the final step, nucleophilic attack of amide
nitrogen takes place on the electron-deficient carbon of Schiff
base followed by a 1,5-proton shift to give the desired 2-
substituted 2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-ones and the ionic
liquid, [Nbdm][OH]. Literature reveals that [28], Gemini ILs
show better catalytic performance compared to their
monocationic counterpart and the reason could be ascribed to the
following factors: firstly, Gemini ionic liquids have two basic
sites, possessing more basic sites than monocationic ionic liquids
with only one basic site. Secondly, two basic sites are adjacent in
Gemini ionic liquids, providing a good synergistic effect with
each other, which is crucial for improving the catalytic
efficiency. Finally, the basic strength of basic sites in Gemini
ionic liquids is higher than that in monocationic ILs, making the
abstraction of proton easier. Due to their stronger and more
intensive basic positions (cationic active sites), they exhibit
higher stability and stronger alkalinity.
2. Leeson, P. D.; Springthorpe, B. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc., 2007, 6,
881.
3. Mhaske, S. B.; Argade, N. P. Tetrahedron, 2006, 62, 9787.
4. Kim, N. Y.; Cheon, C. H. Tetrahedron Lett., 2014, 55, 2340.
5. Zhang, Z.; Wang, M.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, J.; Wang, F.
Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 9205.
6. Xinzhong Li, X.; Lin, Q.; Wang, L. J. Iran. Chem. Soc., 2015, 12,
897.
7. Lobo, H. R.; Singh, B. S.; Shankarling, G. S. Catal. Commun.,
2012, 27, 179.
8. Mekala, R.; Madhubabu, M. V.; Dhanunjaya, G.; Regati, S.;
Chandrasekhar, K. B.; Sarva, J. Synth. Commun., 2017, 47, 121.
9. Patil, Y. P.; Tambade, P. J.; Deshmukh, K. M.; Bhanage, B. M.
Catal. Today, 2009, 148, 355.
10. Zhao, Y.; Yu, B.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Hao, L.; Gao, X.; Liu, Z. A
Angew. Chem., 2014, 126, 6032.
11. Tang, J.; Shi, D.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Li, J. Synth. Commun.,
2010, 40, 632.
12. Tamaddon, F.; Pouramini, F. Synlett, 2014, 25, 1127.
13. Wu, X.; Oschatz, S.; Block, A.; Spannenberg, A.; Langer, P. Org.
Biomol. Chem., 2014, 12, 1865.
14. Borase, P. N.; Thale, P. B.; Shankarling, G. S. RSC Adv., 2016, 6,
63078.
15. Safaei, H. R.; Shekouhy, M.; Ghorbanzadeh, S. ChemistrySelect,
2018, 3, 4750.
16. Singh, V.; Kaur, S.; Sapehiyia, V.; Singh J.; Kad, G. L. Catal.
Commun., 2005, 6, 57.
17. Zhang, R.; Meng, X.; Liu, Z.; Meng J.; Xu, C. Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res., 2008, 47, 8205.
18. Hajipour, A. R.; Rafiee F.; Ruoho, A. E. Synth. Commun., 2006,
36, 2563.
19. Hajipour, A. R.; Rafiee F.; Ruoho, A. E. Synlett, 2007, 7, 1118.
20. Lava, K.; Binnemans, K.; Cardinaels, T. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2009,
113, 9506.
21. Bastrzyk, A.; Feder-Kubis, J. Colloids and Surfaces A, 2018, 557,
58.
22. Anderson, J. L.; Ding, R.; Ellern, A.; Armstrong, D. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 593.
23. Pal, A.; Datta, S.; Aswal, V. K.; Bhattacharya, S. J. Phys. Chem.
B, 2012, 116, 13239.
24. Niemczak, M.; Giszter, R.; Czerniak, K.; Marcinkowska, K.;
Walkiewicz, F. RSC Advances, 2015, 5, 15487.
25. Bhadani, A.; Tani, M.; Endo, T.; Sakai, K.; Abe, M.; Sakai, H.
Phys.Chem.Chem.Phys., 2015, 17, 19474.
26. Wang, D.; Wang, Y.; Wan, H.; Wang J.; Wang, L. RSC Adv.,
2018, 8, 10185.
27. Xu, J. M.; Liu, B. K.; Wu, W. B.; Qian, C.; Wu, Q.; Lin, X. F. J.
Org. Chem., 2006, 71, 3991.
28. Chen, J.; Yang, L.; Zhou, Z.; Zhu, L.; Zhou, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Xia,
D. Energy Fuels, 2018, 32, 5518
29. Typical experimental procedure:2-Aminobezonitrile derivatives (1
mmol), substituted carbonyl compounds (1.5 mmol) and
[Nbmd][OH] (1 mL) were stirred at room temperature. The
progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC under UV light.
After completion of the reaction the mixture was extracted with
ethyl acetate (3 x 10 mL) and washed with water (3 x 10 mL). The
combined extract was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The filtrate
was concentrated under reduced pressure. The product was
purified by column chromatography over silica gel using n-
hexane/ethyl acetate (3:1 v/v) as eluent to get the purified product.
Scheme 3 Plausible reaction mechanism
Conclusion: In conclusion, we have successfully developed a
new and green approach for the construction of pharmaceutically
valuable 2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-ones catalyzed by
[Nbdm][OH] ionic liquid at room temperature. To the best of our
knowledge, this is the first ever room temperature synthesis of
2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-ones from 2-aminobenzonitiles and
carbonyl analogues. Bi-functional nature of the ionic liquid as
catalyst cum solvent is the major advantage of the present
protocol. Moreover, the ionic liquid can be reused up to 5th cycle
without significant loss of catalytic activity.
1
The products were then characterized by ESI-MS, H NMR, 13C
NMR and 1F NMR spectra.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
1
General Information, Experimental and Analytical data, H 13C,
and 1F NMR spectra and characterization data of all the
synthesised compounds are available as Supplementary
Information.
DS is thankful to DBT, New Delhi, India for a research grant [No.
BT/PR24684/NER/95/810/2017]. AD thanks DBT, New Delhi for
Research Fellowship. The financial assistance of UGC-SAP
programme to the Department of Chemistry, Dibrugarh University is
also gratefully acknowledged.