M. Taghavi et al. / Polymer xxx (2013) 1e13
3
of 3.8 g (0.01 mol) 2,4-bis(4-nitrophenoxy)benzaldehyde, 2.1 g
(0.01 mol) 4,40-dihydroxy benzil, 2.42 g (0.07 mol) ammonium acetate
and 50 mL glacial acetic acid was refluxed for 24 h. Upon cooling, the
white precipitate was collected by filtration and washed with ethanol
and water. The yield of the crude product was 5.5 g (91%). The crude
product was recrystallized from ethanol to afford white solid with
melting point 312e315 ꢀC. FT-IR (KBr disk) at cmꢁ1: 3208e3550 (OH
and NH imidazole), 3115 (CeH aromatic), 1615 (C]N), 1588 (C]C),
2.4.2. Direct polycondensation using TPP/IL
Into a 50 mL three-necked round-bottomed flask fitted with a
water cooled condenser, a mechanical stirrer and a nitrogen gas
inlet tube, a mixture of compound 3 (1 mmol, 0.54 g), a dicarboxylic
acid (1 mmol), 1,3-dipropyl imidazolium bromide {[1,3-(pr)2im]Br}
(0.70 g), and TPP (1.29 mmol) was placed. The mixture was heated
at 110 ꢀC for 2.5 h, the solution became viscous as the reaction
proceeded. The reaction mixture was then cooled to room tem-
perature and the resulting polymers were precipitated in 100 mL
methanol. The precipitate was filtered and washed with hot water,
and then was further purified by washing with refluxing methanol
for 24 h in a Soxhlet apparatus to remove the low molecular weight
oligomers. The inherent viscosity (hinh) of the resulting PAs,
measured at a concentration of 0.5 g/dL in NMP at 25 ꢀC, was be-
tween 0.52 and 0.91 dL gꢁ1. The above procedure was used for the
preparation of all PAs, as shown in Scheme 1.
1521, 1352 (NO2),1266 and 1228 (CeO).1H NMR (DMSO-d6,
d inppm):
6.49 (dd,1H, AreH, J ¼ 8.2 Hz), 6.61 (d,1H, AreH, J ¼ 2.4), 6.68 (d, 2H,
AreH, J ¼ 8.4 Hz), 6.70 (d, 2H, AreH, J ¼ 8.4 Hz), 6.96 (d, 1H, AreH,
J ¼ 8.2 Hz), 7.04 (d, 2H, AreH, J ¼ 8.4 Hz), 7.18 (d, 2H, AreH, J ¼ 8.4 Hz),
7.29 (d, 2H, AreH, J ¼ 8.4 Hz), 7.53(d, 2H, AreH, J ¼ 8.4 Hz), 8.21 (d, 2H,
AreH, J ¼ 8.4 Hz), 8.27 (d, 2H, AreH, J ¼ 8.4 Hz), 9.46 (s, 1H, OH
phenol), 9.70 (s, 1H, OH phenol), 12.10 (s, 1H, NH imidazole ring). 13
C
NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6,
d in ppm): 108.07, 110.59, 112.69, 115.65,
116.11, 118.78, 120.11, 124.77, 124.83, 126.66, 127.90, 129.29, 130.20,
130.53, 133.03, 135.96, 142.95, 143.15, 143.79, 147.40, 156.48, 156.90,
158.01, 158.84 and 162.34. Elemental analysis calculated for
PA1: Yield ¼ 88% and hinh ¼ 0.72 dL/g. FT-IR (KBr disk) at cmꢁ1
:
3194e3483 (OH, NH amide and NH imidazole), 3094 (CeH ar-
omatic), 1682 (C]O amide), 1611 (C]N), 1543 (C]C), 1252 and
C33H22N4O8: C, 65.78%; H, 3.65%; N, 9.30% and found: C, 65.71%; H,
3.68%; N, 9.29%.
1214 (CeO). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6,
d in ppm): 6.20e8.08 (m, 23H,
AreH), 9.50 (s, 1H, OH phenol), 9.66 (s, 1H, OH phenol), 10.48 (s,
1H, NH amide), 10.59 (s, 1H, NH amide), 13.63 (s, 1H, NeH,
2.3.3. Synthesis of 4,40-(2-(2,4-bis(4-aminophenoxy)phenyl)-1H-
imidazole-4,5-diyl) diphenol (3)
imidazole
ring).
Elemental
analysis
calculated
for
To a 250 mL round-bottomed three-necked flask equipped with
a dropping funnel, a reflux condenser and a magnetic stir bar,
(C41H28N4O6)n: C, 73.21%; H, 4.17%; N, 8.33%. Found: C, 73.16%; H,
4.20%; N, 8.33%.
6.02
g
(0.01 mol) 4,40-(2-(2,4-bis(4-nitrophenoxy)phenyl)-1H-
PA2: Yield ¼ 83% and hinh ¼ 0.67 dL/g. FT-IR (KBr disk) at cmꢁ1
:
imidazole-4,5-diyl)diphenol and 0.2 g palladium on activated
carbon (Pd/C, 10%), were dispersed in 80 mL ethanol. The sus-
pension solution was heated to reflux, and 8 mL of hydrazine
monohydrate was added slowly to the mixture. After a further 5 h
of reflux, the solution was filtered hot to remove Pd/C, and the
filtrate was cooled to give white crystals. The product was
collected by filtration and dried in vacuum oven at 80 ꢀC. The yield
of the reaction was 81% (4.4 g), and the melting point was 273e
275 ꢀC. FT-IR (KBr disk) at cmꢁ1: 3222e3546 (OH, NH2 and NH
imidazole), 3111 (CeH aromatic), 1615 (C]N), 1588 (C]C), 1258
3250e3559 (OH, NH amide and NH imidazole), 3039 (CeH ar-
omatic), 1666 (C]O amide), 1610 (C]N), 1522 (C]C), 1256 and
1217 (CeO). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6,
d in ppm): 6.08e7.99 (m, 23H,
AreH), 9.44 (s, 1H, OH phenol), 9.65 (s, 1H, OH phenol), 10.43 (s,
1H, NH amide), 10.59 (s, 1H, NH amide), 13.51 (s, 1H, NeH,
imidazole
ring).
Elemental
analysis
calculated
for
(C41H28N4O6)n: C, 73.21%; H, 4.17%; N, 8.33%. Found: C, 73.09%;
H, 4.29%; N, 8.30%.
PA3: Yield ¼ 89% and hinh ¼ 0.91 dL/g. FT-IR (KBr disk) at cmꢁ1
:
3272e3538 (OH, NH amide and NH imidazole), 3066 (CeH ar-
omatic), 1671 (C]O amide), 1607 (C]N), 1517 (C]C), 1258 and
and 1236 (CeO). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6,
d in ppm): 5.03 (s, 2H, NH),
5.40 (s, 2H, NH), 6.06 (dd, 1H, AreH, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 6.28 (d, 1H,
J ¼ 2.4 Hz), 6.51 (d, 2H, AreH, J ¼ 8.4 Hz), 6.58 (dd, 2H, AreH,
J ¼ 8.4 Hz), 6.62 (s, 1H, AreH), 6.65e6.69 (m, 4H, AreH), 6.76 (dd,
2H, AreH, J ¼ 8.40), 6.92 (d, 2H, AreH, J ¼ 8.20), 7.01 (dd, 2H, Are
H, J ¼ 8.40), 7.22 (dd, 2H, AreH, J ¼ 8.40), 9.43 (s, 1H, OH phenol),
9.61 (s, 1H, OH phenol), 13.92 (s, 1H, NH imidazole ring). 13C NMR
1213 (CeO). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6,
d in ppm): 6.20e8.33 (m, 22H,
AreH), 9.49 (s, 1H, OH phenol), 9.65 (s, 1H, OH phenol), 10.99 (s,
1H, NH amide), 11.08 (s, 1H, NH amide), 13.52 (s, 1H, NeH,
imidazole
ring).
Elemental
analysis
calculated
for
(C40H27N5O6)n: C, 71.32%; H, 4.01%; N, 10.40%. Found: C, 71.16%;
H, 4.37%; N, 10.37%.
(100 MHz, DMSO-d6,
d
in ppm): 104.15, 106.77, 107.93, 114.40,
PA4: Yield ¼ 90% and hinh ¼ 0.66 dL/g. FT-IR (KBr disk) at cmꢁ1
:
115.23, 115.66, 115.74, 120.69, 121.93, 124.70, 124.85, 126.98, 127.65,
129.56, 130.10, 133.10, 133.45, 144.38, 144.86, 146.39, 149.70,
156.77, 157.73, 159.96 and 160.71. Elemental analysis calculated for
3285e3561 (OH, NH amide and NH imidazole), 3068 (CeH ar-
omatic), 1687 (C]O amide), 1608 (C]N), 1519 (C]C), 1256 and
1219 (CeO). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6,
d in ppm): 6.43e8.34 (m, 27H,
C
33H26N4O4: C, 73.06%; H, 4.80%; N, 10.33% and found: C, 73.01%;
AreH), 9.51 (s, 1H, OH phenol), 9.67 (s, 1H, OH phenol), 10.55 (s,
1H, NH amide), 10.59 (s, 1H, NH amide), 13.51 (s, 1H, NeH,
H, 4.93%; N, 10.29%.
imidazole
ring).
Elemental
analysis
calculated
for
2.4. PAs synthesis
(C47H32N4O8S)n: C, 69.46%; H, 3.94%; N, 6.90%. Found: C, 69.37%;
H, 4.01%; N, 6.90%.
2.4.1. Direct polycondensation using TPP/NMP/Py/LiCl
PA5: Yield ¼ 93% and hinh ¼ 0.52 dL/g. FT-IR (KBr disk) at cmꢁ1
:
Into a 50 mL three-necked round-bottomed flask equipped with a
condenser, a mechanical stirrer and a nitrogen gas inlet tube,
monomer 3 (1 mmol, 0.54 g), a dicarboxylic acid (1 mmol), and LiCl
(0.30 g) were dissolved in a mixture of Py (1 mL), TPP (1.20 mmol),
and NMP (5 mL). The mixture was heated at 50 ꢀC for 6 h and at 70 ꢀC
for 4 h with stirring under dry N2 atmosphere. The homogeneous
solution was poured into a 9 cm diameter glass culture dish, which
was heated under vacuum at 80 ꢀC for 1 h, 100 ꢀC for 2 h, and 140 ꢀC
for 5 h to evaporate the solvent slowly. Polymer films were self-
stripped off from the glass surface by soaking in water. The poly-
mer films were further dried in a vacuum oven at 160 ꢀC for 6 h.
3255e3519 (OH, NH amide and NH imidazole), 3052 (CeH ar-
omatic), 1677 (C]O amide), 1612 (C]N), 1523 (C]C), 1251 and
1206 (CeO). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6,
d in ppm): 1.63 (m, 4H, CeH),
2.32 (t, 4H, CeH), 6.68e8.25 (m, 19H, AreH), 9.40 (s, 1H, OH
phenol), 9.55 (s, 1H, OH phenol), 10.53 (s, 1H, NH amide), 10.59
(s, 1H, NH amide), 13.40 (s, 1H, NeH, imidazole ring). Elemental
analysis calculated for (C39H32N4O6)n: C, 71.78%; H, 4.91%; N,
8.59%. Found: C, 71.68%; H, 5.04%; N, 8.55%.
PA6: Yield ¼ 96% and hinh ¼ 0.61 dL/g. FT-IR (KBr disk) at cmꢁ1
:
3258e3526 (OH, NH amide and NH imidazole), 3060 (CeH ar-
omatic), 1668 (C]O amide), 1609 (C]N), 1518 (C]C), 1251 and
Please cite this article in press as: Taghavi M, et al., Influence of ionic liquid on selective polycondensation of a new diamine-bisphenol:
j.polymer.2013.05.043