of ETPs.7 Given that the intracellular redox potential has
been shown to vary at different stages of the cell cycle and
in different diseases, we recognized that accessing and
studying ETP-analogs with altered redox properties could
provide insight into the possibity of developing com-
pounds that would, on this basis, selectively engage dis-
eased cells.8 In our initial studies to this end we were
interested in replacing the disulfide with a diselenide.9
Herein we report the initial stages of this study which have
culminated in the first synthesis of an epidiselenodiketopi-
perazine (ESeP).
diselenide 4 was formed, presumably through the corre-
sponding acyl-iminium intermediate (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Diselenide 4 from DKP 3
Due to their structural complexity the ETP family of
natural products have received considerable attention
from the synthetic community,10 and several syntheses
have appeared recently.11 Although compounds in this
class have clearly become more accessible there remains an
absence of reports describing analogs wherein either one or
both sulfur atoms have been replaced by selenium.12 In
fact, a literature search revealed only a limited number of
bicyclic bridging diselenides,13 none of which were incor-
porated into a [2.2.2] framework. Unbiasedby any reported
appraoches to ESePs we decide to develop a method that
would allow for the conversion of an ETP to the corre-
sponding ESeP, a strategy that would potentially enable
one to employ gliotoxin, dehydrogliotoxin, or any other
epidithiodiketopiperazine as a point of departure.
Having established the viability of preparing a bridging
diselenide from an intermediate bis-electrophile, we fo-
cused our efforts on the ETP to ESeP conversion. To this
end it was envisioned that reduction of the disulfide and
capture of the intermediate thiolates as their thiomethyl
ethers would set the stage for an activation step wherein an
intermediate bissulfonium (7) would give rise to the requi-
site acyl-iminium ion. Capture of this intermediate with
a diselenide dianion equivalent in a manner analogous
to our model study would then furnish the desired ESeP
(4, Scheme 2).
Prior to investigating an ETP to ESeP conversion we
chose to familiarize ourselves with the potential reagents
by exploring the conversion of a simple diketopiperzine
(DKP) to the corresponding ESeP. To this end, known
DKP 3 was converted to its correpsonding dibromide14
whichwasthensubjected toa diselenide dianion equivalent
under conditions developed by Krief and Derock.15
Gratifyingly, under these conditions the desired bridging
Scheme 2. Planned Synthesis of Diselenide 4 from Disulfide 5
(7) Bernardo, P. H.; Brasch, N.; Chai, C. L. L.; Waring, P. J. Biol.
Chem. 2003, 278, 46549.
(8) Sarsour, E. H.; Kumar, M. G.; Chaudhuri, L.; Kalen, A. L.;
Goswami, P. C. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009, 11, 2985.
(9) The redox potentials (E0) of model peptides containing diselenide
(E0 = À381 mV) and selenosulfide (E0 = À326 mV) bonds have been
determined using dithiothreitol (E0 = À323 mV, pH 7.0) as a reference;
see: Besse, D.; Siedler, F.; Diercks, T.; Kessler, H.; Moroder, L. Agnew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 883.
(10) For seminal reports, see: (a) Fukuyama, T.; Nakatsuka, S.-I.;
Kishi, Y. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 2045. (b) Fukuyama, T.; Kishi, Y. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 6723. (c) Kishi, Y.; Fukuyama, T.; Nakatsuka, S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 6492.
(11) For recent syntheses of ETP natural products, see: (a) DeLorbe,
J. E.; Jabri, S. Y.; Mennen, S. M.; Overman, L. E.; Zhang, F.-L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6549. (b) Codelli, J. A.; Puchlopek, A. L. A.;
Reisman, S. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 134, 1930. (c) Kim, J.;
Movassaghi, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 14376. (d) Iwasa, E.;
Hamashima, Y.; Fujishiro, S.; Higuchi, E.; Ito, A.; Yoshida, M.;
Sodeoka, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 4078. (e) Kim, J.; Ashenhurst,
J. A.; Movassaghi, M. Science 2009, 324, 238.
To convert disulfide 5 to bisthiomethyl ether 6 we
first opened the disulfide with NaBH4 and then treated
the resultant dithiol with iodomethane.16 To activate the
bisthiomethyl ether we envisioned treating it with a variety
of electrophiles including methylating reagents (to form
dimethyl sulfide as a leaving group) or halogenating re-
agents. Ultimately bromine proved best, giving dibromide
9 when added to bisthiomethyl ether 6. As previously es-
tablished the dibromide could be treated with the disele-
nide dianion equivalent to afford diselenide 4 (Scheme 3).
Having gained access for the first time toan ESeP (i.e., 4)
we decided to briefly look at its biological activity against
MTB. For comparative purposes we also explored the
activity of disulfide 5 and the corresponding bismethylthio-
and bismethylseleno-analogs of 4 and 5 (i.e., 6 and 10,
(12) To the best of our knowledge, replacement of sulfur with
selenium has not been reported; however, the dioxo- and dinitrogen
analogs have. See: (a) Markham, J. L.; Sammes, P. G. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1979, 1885. (b) Sanz-Cervera, J. F.; Williams, R. M.;
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
Marco, J. A.; Lopez-Sanchez, J. M.; Gonzalez, F.; Martınez, M. E.;
´
ꢀ
Sancenon, F. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6345.
(13) (a) Tonkikh, N.; Duddeck, H.; Petrova, M.; Neilands, O.;
Strakovs, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 1999, 1585. (b) Sureshkumar,
D.; Ganesh, V.; Chandrasekaran, S. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 5313.
(14) Williams, R. M.; Armstrong, R. W.; Maruyama, L. K.; Dung,
J. S.; Anderson, O. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3246.
ꢀ
(16) Cook, K. M.; Hilton, S. T.; Mecinovic, J.; Motherwell, W. B.;
(15) Krief, A.; Derock, M. Synlett 2005, 2005, 1012.
Figg, W. D.; Schofield, C. J. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 26831.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX