These examples suggest that chiral diphosphines such as
2 might be useful synthons if the C2-symmetric isomer
could be prepared selectively and if the P-inversion barrier
was high enough to enable routine manipulations. There-
fore, we investigated a rare class of heterocycles, the
benzodiphosphetanes, in which steric effects make the
meso-isomer less stable than the C2 one and should also
increase the P-inversion barrier (Figure 2).
available 10 with t-BuMgCl (Scheme 1).16 Treatment of
9 withexcess t-BuMgCl also generated 8. This reaction had
been reported in 1986 by Kyba and co-workers, who
observed benzodiphosphetane 8 by 31P NMR spectro-
scopy but were not able to identify or isolate it.16
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Benzodiphosphetane 8
Figure 2. Benzodiphosphetanes and analogous dicarbaborane
derivatives.
Although the all-carbon analogues (cyclobutarenes)8
have been intensively studied, and silicon9 and sulfur
derivatives are known,10 very few benzodiphosphetanes
have been prepared. After unsuccessful attempts to make
3, which gave its dimer 4 in <1% yield,11 the sterically
protected 5 (Mes* = 2,4,6-(t-Bu)3C6H2) was reported,12
and the parent compound 6 was observed as a reaction
intermediate (Figure 2).13 More recently, the synthesis and
structures of analogous carbaborane derivatives 7aꢀb
were reported,14 but little is known about the reactivity
and possible applications of the PꢀP bond in these
compounds.
Here we report a simple synthesis of trans-1,2-(P(t-Bu))2
C6H4 (8), studies of its reactivity, its resolution using a Pd
complex, and its use as a building block for synthesis of
P-stereogenic bis(phosphines) of known and potential utility
in asymmetric catalysis.
Benzodiphosphetane 8 was prepared in 78% yield by
reduction of the known chlorophosphine 9 with Mg;14,15
this reaction may be carried out in one pot without
isolation of 9 after its generation from commercially
Alternatively, a copper-catalyzed reaction of bis-
(secondary phosphine)16 11 with 2 equiv of NaOSiMe3
and dibromoethane gave 8.17 Similarly, treatment of 11
with 2 equiv of n-BuLi gave dianion 12; quenching with
dibromoethane gave 8 as the major product. More surpris-
ingly, treatment of 12withbenzyl bromide or chloride gave
8 in a mixture with the expected product, bis(tertiary
benzylphosphine) 13. The 8/13 product ratios (5:1 for Br,
1.2:1 for Cl) were consistent with formation of 8 via attack
of the phosphido nucleophile at a halide instead of carbon,
or an electron transfer process (Scheme 1).18
Despite the strained ring system, 8 distilled without
decomposition under vacuum at 110 °C. It was air-stable
for several days, even in solution. The volatility of 8 was
consistent with its formulation as a monomer, not a dimer
such as 4, as were 1H NMR DOSY studies, using 11 as an
internal standard.19 DFT calculations on 8 predicted a
PꢀP bond length (2.292 A) in the normal range20 and the
˚
expected acute CPC angle (75.9°, Figure 3). C2-Symmetric
8, the only isomer observed, was calculated to be 12 kcal/mol
more stable than its meso isomer. The computed bar-
rier to pyramidal inversion in 8 (35 kcal/mol) was, as
(8) (a) Sadana, A. K.; Saini, R. K.; Billups, W. E. Chem. Rev. 2003,
103, 1539–1602. (b) Stanger, A. In The Chemistry of Cyclobutanes;
Rappoport, Z., Liebman, J. F., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, U.K.,
2005; Vol. 2, pp 617ꢀ654.
(9) Ishikawa, M.; Naka, A. Synlett 1995, 794–802.
(10) Breitenstein, M.; Schulz, R.; Schweig, A. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47,
1979–1980.
(17) (a) Cain, M. F.; Hughes, R. P.; Glueck, D. S.; Golen, J. A.;
Moore, C. E.; Rheingold, A. L. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 7650–7662. (b)
Cain, M. F.; Reynolds, S. C.; Anderson, B. J.; Glueck, D. S.; Golen,
J. A.; Moore, C. E.; Rheingold, A. L. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2011, 369, 55–61.
(18) (a) Seyferth, D.; Wood, T. G.; Henderson, R. S. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1987, 336, 163–182. (b) Gillespie, D. G.; Walker, B. J. Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 1975, 16, 4709–4710.
(11) Mann, F. G.; Mercer, A. J. H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1972, 2548–2555.
€
€
(12) Markl, G.; Hennig, R.; Noth, H. Liebigs Ann./Recueil 1997, 121–
125.
(13) Ghebreab, M. B.; Shalumova, T.; Tanski, J. M.; Waterman, R.
Polyhedron 2010, 29, 42–45.
ꢀ
€
(14) Kreienbrink, A.; Sarosi, M. B.; Rys, E. G.; Lonnecke, P.; Hey-
Hawkins, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 4701–4703.
(15) Tanimoto, Y.; Ishizu, Y.; Kubo, K.; Miyoshi, K.; Mizuta, T.
J. Organomet. Chem. 2012, 713, 80–88.
(19) (a) Li, D.; Keresztes, I.; Hopson, R.; Williard, P. G. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2009, 42, 270–280. (b) Macchioni, A.; Ciancaleoni, G.; Zuccaccia,
C.; Zuccaccia, D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 479–489.
˚
(20) Average P-P distance in diphosphines = 2.221 ( 0.11 A
(16) Kyba, E. P.; Kerby, M. C.; Rines, S. P. Organometallics 1986, 5,
1189–1194.
(Forster, D.; Nieger, M.; Gudat, D. Organometallics 2011, 30, 2628–
2631).
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX