led to several promising routes,7 in addition to a few
recently completed total syntheses by the groups of
Weinreb,8 Funk,9 Ma,10 and Qin.11
Figure 2. Interrupted Fischer indolization methodology and
approach toward alkaloids 1ꢀ9.
intermediates for our total synthesis objectives but also
an opportunity to study the scope and limitations of the
interrupted Fischer indolization methodology. Herein, we
report the outcome of the interrupted Fischer indolization
reaction as variations in the N,O-acetal coupling fragment
(at C7, C8, or C3) are considered.
Figure 1. Communesins (1ꢀ8) and perophoramidine (9).
The first point of variation we explored was the sub-
stituent at C7 of the N,O-acetal component, as a C7-
aminoethyl substituent would be necessary for the synthe-
sis of the communesin family of natural products and
also for perophoramidine (Scheme 1). Acetal 16, a readily
available known compound,16 was treated with TMSOTf
En route to the total synthesis of compounds 1ꢀ9 and a
variety of other alkaloids, we have developed a cascade
reaction that provides access to fused indoline scaffolds.12
The transformation, termed the “interrupted Fischer13ꢀ15
indolization”, allows for aryl hydrazines 10 and latent
aldehydes 11 to be converted to indoline products 12
(Figure 2). The reaction is operationally simple and broad
in scope, requires mild reaction conditions, and has shown
utility in synthesis.12 In our initial attempts, we found that
the interrupted Fischer indolization of N-methylphenylhy-
drazine (13) with N,O-acetal 14 efficiently delivered tetra-
cycle 15.12a,b Of note, this reaction provides rapid access
to the 6,5,6,6 FꢀEꢀDꢀC ring system of the communesins
and perophoramidine and provides a unique approach to
these highly sought after alkaloids.
€
in the presence of Hunig’s base to afford enol ether 17 as
an inconsequential mixture of E/Z isomers. Subsequently,
enol ether 17 underwent a hetero-DielsꢀAlder reaction
with sulfonamide 1817 to deliver the desired N,O-acetal
substrate 19 in 70% yield. In the interrupted Fischer
indolization reaction, treatment of 19 with N-methylphe-
nylhydrazine (13) furnished tetracycles 20 and 21 in a com-
bined 67% yield (approximately 3:1 ratio of 20 to 21).18
Thus, we were able to construct the key indoline scaffold,
which bears a nitrogen functional handle useful for the
synthesis of the communesin alkaloids.
Encouraged by these results, we also explored the inter-
rupted Fischer indolization of two reaction partners that
could plausibly allow for assembly of the seven-membered
G ring of the communesins. Thus, hydrazine 2219 under-
went reaction with N,O-acetal 2320 to provide tetracyclic
indoline 24 in 54% yield (Scheme 2). Subsequent removal
of the phthalyl group was achieved upon treatment of 24
with hydrazine monohydrate to give primary amine 25.
With the aim of forging the G ring via a PictetꢀSpengler
cyclization,21 amine 25was condensed with3-methylbut-2-
enal to furnish imine 26. Unfortunately our efforts to
By further varying the reaction partners in the key
interrupted Fischer indolization reaction, we envisioned
that more highly functionalized derivatives of 15 could be
readily accessible. This would provide not only advanced
(8) Liu, P.; Seo, J. H.; Weinreb, S. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010,
49, 2000–2003.
(9) Fuchs, J. R.; Funk, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5068–5069.
(10) (a) Zuo, Z.; Ma, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 12008–
12011. (b) Zuo, Z.; Xie, W.; Ma, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13226–
13228.
(11) (a) Yang, J.; Wu, H.; Shen, L.; Qin, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 13794–13795. (b) Wu, H.; Xue, F.; Xiao, X.; Qin, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2010, 132, 14052–14054.
(12) (a) Boal, B. W.; Schammel, A. W.; Garg, N. K. Org. Lett. 2009,
11, 3458–3461. (b) Schammel, A. W.; Boal, B. W.; Zu, L.; Mesganaw, T.;
€
€
Garg, N. K. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 4687–4695. (c) C-elebi-Olc-um, N.;
Boal, B. W.; Huters, A. D.; Garg, N. K; Houk, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2011, 133, 5752–5755. (d) Zu, L.; Boal, B. W.; Garg, N. K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2011, 133, 8877–8879. (e) Schammel, A. W.; Chiou, G.; Garg, N. K.
J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 725–728.
~
(16) (a) Paz Munoz, M.; de la Torre, M. C.; Sierra, M. A. Adv. Synth.
ꢀ
Catal. 2010, 352, 2189–2194. (b) Kowalski, P.; Jaskowska, J. Arch.
Pharm. (Weinheim, Ger.) 2012, 345, 81–85.
(17) Steinhagen, H.; Corey, E. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38,
1928–1931.
(18) The formation of NMe and NH products is consistent with
previous observations in the interrupted Fischer indolization; see
ref 12a, 12b.
(19) Srivastava, S.; Ruane, P. H.; Toscano, J. P.; Sullivan, M. B.;
Cramer, C. J.; Chiapperino, D.; Reed, E. C.; Falvey, D. E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 8271–8278.
(13) For reviews of the classic Fischer indole synthesis, see: (a)
Robinson, B. Chem. Rev. 1963, 63, 373–401. (b) Robinson, B. Chem.
Rev. 1969, 69, 227–250.
(14) For seminal studies of the Fischer indole synthesis, see: (a)
Fischer, E.; Jourdan, F. Ber. 1883, 16, 2241–2245. (b) Fischer, E.; Hess,
O. Ber. 1884, 17, 559–568.
(15) For the use of the interrupted Fischer indolization to access
flustramine derivatives, see: Bunders, C.; Cavanagh, J.; Melander, C.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 5476–5481.
(20) Carbamylated N,O-acetal 23 was employed in this study because
it was found to be more readily removable compared to the N-Ts group.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX