PHOSPHORUS, SULFUR, AND SILICON AND THE RELATED ELEMENTS
3
Table 2. The post-emergence herbicidal activity of II-6.
3.2. Crop selectivity
Compd.
Rate (g ai/ha)
Amrb
Cheb
Brjb
Ipnb
Conventional rice, corn, cotton, soybean, rape, and wheat
were respectively planted in plots (diameter ¼12 cm) con-
taining test soil and grown in a greenhouse at 20–25 ꢀC.
After the plants had reached the four-leaf stage, the spraying
treatment was conducted at different dosages by diluting the
formulation of the selected compounds. The visual injury
and growth state of the individual plant were observed at
regular intervals. The final evaluation for crops safety of the
selected compounds was conducted by visual observation in
30 days after treatment on the 0–100 scale (0 ¼ no injury,
10 ¼ chlorosis, 100 ¼ death).
II-6
37.5
18.75
37.5
18.75
37.5
18.75
37.5
95
90
90
70
60
60
100
90
75
70
80
75
70
50
80
70
100
95
100
80
75
70
100
100
90
90
100
90
60
50
100
100
2,4-D
Glyphosate
Clacyfos
18.75
aInhibitory potency (%) against the growth of plants in the greenhouse, 0 (no
effect), 100% (completely kill).
bAmr: common amaranth; Che: goosefoot; Brj: leaf mustard; Ipn: morning glory.
Table 3. Post-emergence herbicidal activity of 10% II-6 EC in maize field.
Inhibitory potency % (45 DAT)
Rate g ai/ha
Eclc Acac Abuc Chec Polc Xanc Solc
300
360
450
600
92 100
96 100
98 100
100 100
95 100
95
97
100
100
96
96
95
90
95
90
95
98
98
97
Funding
100 100
100 100 100
100 100 100
The work was supported in part by the National Research
and Development Plan (2017YFD0200506), the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (21877047), 111
Project B17019.
57% 2,4-D butyl ester EC 513
96
98
98
aInhibitory potency (%) was measured as percentage change in each weed
fresh weight compared to that of the untreated control; values are the aver-
age of 4 replicates. DAT is day after treatment.
bApplication method: Spray one time by a Jacto PJ-16 or Matabi sprayer.
cEcl: white eclipta, Aca: Asian copperleaf, Abu: chingma abutilon, Che: goose-
foot, Pob: bunge’s smartweed, Xan: Siberian cocklebur, Sol:
black nightshade.
References
[1] Eto, M. Functions of Phosphorus Moiety in Agrochemical
Molecules. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 1997, 61, 1–11.
[2] Baillie, A. C.; Wright, K.; Wright, B. J.; Earnshaw, C. G.
Inhibitors of Pyruvate Dehydrogenase as Herbicides. Pestic.
Biochem. Physiol. 1988, 30, 103–112.
broad weed-controlling spectrum and good inhibitory activ-
ity against broad-leaved weeds at 150c–18.5 g ai/ha, which
were comparable to 2,4-D and glyphosate. It is safe for
wheat, maize and rice especially.
Field data showed that II-6 exhibited good post-emer-
gence herbicidal effect against main weeds in maize field
and very safe for maize at 300–450 g ai/ha. Therefore it dis-
played potential utility as a selective post-emergence herbi-
cide for weed control in monocotyledonous crops fields. It
would be promising that II-6 as post-emergence herbicide
for weed control in wheat or rice field.
[3] Kluger, R.; Pike, D. C. Active Site Generated Analogs of
Reactive Intermediates in Enzymic Reactions. Potent Inhibition
of Pyruvate Dehydrogenase by
a Phosphonate Analog of
Pyruvate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4504–4506.
[4] He, H.-W.; Yuan, J.-L.; Peng, H.; Chen, T.; Shen, P.; Wan, S.-
Q.; Li, Y.; Tan, H.-L.; He, Y.-H.; He, J.-B.; et al. Studies of O, O
-Dimethyl
a-(2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetoxy)Ethylphosphonate
(HW02) as a New Herbicide. 1. Synthesis and Herbicidal
Activity of HW02 and Analogues as Novel Inhibitors of
Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011,
59, 4801–4813.
3.1. Experimental greenhouse herbicidal activity
[5] Turner, J. A. The Pesticide Manual, 17th ed.; BCPC: British
Weed seeds were planted in 9 cm-diameter plastic boxes
containing artificial mixed soil. Before plant emergence, the
boxes were covered with plastic film to keep moist. Plants
were grown in the greenhouse. Fresh weight of the above
ground tissues was measured 10 days after treatment. The
inhibition percent is used to describe the control efficiency
of compounds. All test compounds were dissolved in N,N-
dimethylformamide with the addition of a little Tween 20
and then were sprayed using a laboratory belt sprayer deliv-
ering at 750 L/ha spray-volume. The mixture of the same
amount of water, N,N-dimethylformamide and Tween 20
was sprayed as control.
Crop Production Council: Hampshire, 2015; p. 215.
[6] Kiran, Y. B.; Devendranath Reddy, C.; Gunasekar, D.; Suresh
Reddy, C.; Leon, A.; Barbosa, L. C. A. Synthesis and Anticancer
Activity of New Class of Bisphosphonates/Phosphanamidates.
Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 43, 885–892.
[7] Sulsky, R.; Robl, J. A.; Biller, S. A.; Harrity, T. W.; Wetterau, J.;
Connolly, F.; Jolibois, K.; Kunselman, L. 5-Carboxamido-1,3,2-
Dioxaphosphorinanes, Potent Inhibitors of MTP. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 5067–5070.
[8] Wang, W.; He, H.-W.; Zuo, N.; Zhang, X.; Lin, J.-S.; Chen, W.;
Peng, H.; et. al. Synthesis and Herbicidal Activity of 2-(Substituted
Phenoxyacetoxy)Alkyl-5,5-Dimethyl-1,3,2-Dioxaphosphinan-2-One
Containing Fluorine. J. Fluorine Chem. 2012, 142, 24–28.