.
Angewandte
Communications
Table 1: Synthesis of borane-protected phosphinosulfonamides.
inant, the secondary iminophosphorane form was almost
exclusively the tautomer found in solution for ligands 8–11.
The relative basicity of the phosphorus lone pair can explain
this behavior. Electron-rich groups on the P atom increase the
basic character of the lone pair, thus favoring the formation of
the PH tautomer. Likewise, electron-withdrawing groups on
nitrogen make the NH group more acidic, again favoring the
PH form.[10]
Most interestingly, the SIPs 8–11 are stable to oxidation
and can be stored for months under air without noticeable
decomposition. They are also configurationally stable, as
confirmed by [a]D analysis in chloroform.[11] From a practical
point of view, SIPs 8–11 are of interest because they can be
considered a new class of P-stereogenic preligands, like the
SPOs. As such, they are unique in the sense that they bear
a tert-butylmethylphosphino fragment that is crucial in the
construction of highly effective ligands such as quinoxP*,[12]
tcfp,[13] and maxphos.[7a]
Entry
R
Product
t [h]
Yield [%]
1
2
Mes
Tripp
p-Tol
CF3
4
5
6
7
5
7
8
4
85
85
78
95
3
4[a]
[a] N-phenyl-bis(trifluoromethanesulfonimide) was used instead of the
corresponding sulfonylchloride. Mes=2,4,6-trimethylphenyl,
Tripp=2,4,6-tris(isopropyl)phenyl.
was smoothly prepared in a 95% yield using N-phenyl-
bis(trifluoromethanesulfonimide) (Table 1, entry 4).[8]
Borane deprotection of compounds 4–7 was conducted
under basic conditions in the presence of an excess of 1,4-
diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO). Heating was required to
attain satisfactory conversions in a reasonable time frame. In
this manner, phosphino arylsulfonamides were deprotected
readily in excellent yields (Table 2, entries 1–3). Finally,
borane removal of the triflamide derivative 7 was not viable
We next studied the capacity of SIP ligands for coordina-
tion to rhodium (Scheme 1). Ligands 8, 9, and 10, which were
conveniently scaled up and easily purified, were chosen for
Table 2: Removal of the borane group.
Entry
R
Borane
T [8C]
t [h]
Product
Yield [%]
1
2
Mes
Tripp
p-Tol
CF3
4
5
6
7
80
100
80
2
2
5
6
8
9
10
11
89
92
78
38
Scheme 1. Synthesis of cationic RhI complexes with SIP ligands.
Cod =1,5-cyclooctadiene, Mes=2,4,6-trimethylphenyl, Tripp=2,4,6-
tris(isopropyl)phenyl.
3
4[a]
50
[a] Deprotection was conducted under acidic conditions (HBF4 in
MeOH). DABCO=1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane, Mes=2,4,6-trimethyl-
phenyl, Tripp=2,4,6-tris(isopropyl)phenyl.
this purpose.[14] The reaction of bulky iminophosphoranes
with [Rh(cod)2]BF4 resulted in the exchange of a single 1,5-
cyclooctadiene (cod) unit, as determined by H NMR spec-
1
under basic conditions. We attributed this lack of reactivity to
the increased acidity of the NH group. In the presence of
DABCO, this group is deprotonated, thereby making the
troscopy. The addition of an excess of the SIP ligand did not
lead to a dimeric species; we propose that the steric bulk of
the ligand is responsible for this behavior. Complexes 12 and
13 were isolated as air-stable yellow solids.[15] In contrast, 14
resulted in an oil that slowly decomposed to an unidentified
mixture of complexes and, in our hands, could not be purified.
Upon coordination to rhodium, the tautomeric equilibri-
um is effectively displaced towards the phosphinosulfona-
mide form. This leaves a relatively acidic NH group in place
that shows a resonance around 8 ppm in the 1H NMR
spectrum (CDCl3). Accordingly, we attempted to prepare
the analogous neutral complexes in the presence of a base.
These were expected to be similar from a structural point of
view, but very different electronically. The reaction of SIP
ligands 8 and 9 with [Rh(cod)2]BF4 in the presence of
triethylamine provided the neutral, highly apolar complexes
15 and 16, which were then purified by either extraction with
hexanes or filtration through alumina to separate them from
the salt byproduct (Scheme 2).
À
neighboring phosphane even more electron rich. R3P BH3
complexes of electron-rich phosphanes cannot be deprotected
by borane exchange using an amine.[9] Instead, compound 7
was deprotected under acidic conditions (HBF4, MeOH) to
afford the desired compound 11 in 38% yield (Table 2,
entry 4).
1H NMR analysis of compounds 8 and 9 in CDCl3 showed
a single set of signals and the characteristic resonance of a PH
group, with couplings of 452 Hz (JP) and 4 Hz (JH). In
contrast, compound 10, which bears a TsN group (Ts =
p-toluenesulfonyl), showed two sets of signals in a 1:8 ratio
1
in the 31P and H NMR spectra (CDCl3, RT), with the PH
tautomer being the most abundant in solution. Finally, ligand
11, which bears an electron-withdrawing TfNH group, was
present only as the PH tautomer, as determined by NMR
spectroscopy in CDCl3. In contrast with the ligands reported
by Reek and co-workers, where the NH form was predom-
2
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!