metal-organic compounds
Acta Crystallographica Section C
Crystal Structure
Communications
few reports on flexible ether-bridged dipyridyl ligands. In
order to investigate further the influence of factors such as the
terminal groups of the ligand and the coordinated metal ions
on the topologies and properties of supramolecular
compounds, we studied the design and synthesis of a new,
flexible, ether-bridged dipyridyl ligand, 1,2-bis[4-(pyridin-3-
yl)phenoxy]ethane (L). Three new macrocycles have been
synthesized based on L and the inorganic salts HgX2 (X = Cl,
Br and I), viz. [Hg2Cl4L2], (I), [Hg2Br4L2], (II), and [Hg2I4L2],
(III). The X-ray crystal structures show that the three
ISSN 0108-2701
The structures of three Hg2X4L2
macrocycles {X = Cl, Br and I, and
L = 1,2-bis[4-(pyridin-3-yl)phenoxy]-
ethane} assembled from ether-bridged compounds are isostructural. We report here the inter-
molecular interactions in the lattices of the three com-
pounds.
dipyridyl ligands
Dan Wu, Na Qin, Qi-Kui Liu, Jian-Ping Ma and Yu-Bin
Dong*
College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Shandong
Normal University, Jinan 250014, People’s Republic of China
Received 24 February 2012
Accepted 27 April 2012
Online 12 May 2012
The new ether-bridged dipyridyl ligand 1,2-bis[4-(pyridin-3-
yl)phenoxy]ethane (L) has been used to synthesize three
isostructural centrosymmetric binuclear HgII macrocycles,
namely bis{ꢀ-1,2-bis[4-(pyridin-3-yl)phenoxy]ethane-ꢁ2N:N0}-
The three isostructural compounds crystallize in the triclinic
space group P1. The unit cells have been chosen in a similar
fashion in order to facilitate the structural comparison. The
unit cell of (III) became nonstandard (cell setting I, but b > c >
a). As shown in Fig. 1, each compound contains centrosym-
metric macrocycles comprised of two ligands bridging two
HgX2 moieties. The HgII centre lies in a highly distorted
tetrahedral coordination environment defined by two N-atom
donors from two pyridine rings and two coordinated Xꢁ
anions (X = Cl, Br and I). The corresponding metal–ligand
interatomic bond lengths and angles exhibit some differences
in (I), (II) and (III) (Tables 1–3), but are comparable to the
values of reported related HgII complexes (Masciocchi et al.,
2009). The diameters of the cavities in the middle of the
bis[dichloridomercury(II)], [Hg2Cl4(C24H20N2O2)2], and the
bromido, [Hg2Br4(C24H20N2O2)2], and iodido, [Hg2I4(C24H20-
N2O2)2], analogues. The Hg atoms adopt a highly distorted
tetrahedral coordination environment consisting of two
halides and two pyridine N-donor atoms from two bridging
ligands. In the solid state, the macrocycles form two-
dimensional sheets in the bc plane through noncovalent
Hgꢀ ꢀ ꢀX and Xꢀ ꢀ ꢀX (X = Cl, Br and I) interactions.
Comment
Numerous supramolecular compounds designed and con-
structed through crystal engineering have attracted significant
attention because of their fascinating structural topologies
(Chae et al., 2001) and functional applications (Wang et al.,
2011). It is well known that the selection of appropriate
ligands as building blocks is a key point in the design and
synthesis of functional supramolecular compounds. Compared
with rigid ligands, flexible ligands can adopt different confor-
mations under varying conditions resulting in potentially
novel topologies (Chuang et al., 2010). N-Donor ligands, such
as those containing pyridyl groups, are good candidates for the
assembly of versatile structures (Fujita et al., 2007). Recently,
our group has reported several compounds generated from
flexible ether-bridged ligands containing dicyanomethylene
groups (Dong et al., 2007), carboxylic acid groups (Jiang et al.,
2009), terminal indoline-2,3-dione groups (Fang et al., 2011)
and terminal imidazole groups (Yuan et al., 2011). There are
˚
macrocycles are 3.269 (7), 3.811 (7) and 2.770 (6) A for the Cl,
Br and I derivatives, respectively.
The flexible L ligand can adopt different conformations
under different conditions. In a previous study, a flexible ether-
bridged organic ligand with terminal indoline-2,3-dione
groups adopts a trans conformation about its central core in
the free state, but a gauche conformation after coordinating to
the AgI centre (Fang et al., 2011). Here, in (I), the O1—C12—
C13—O2 torsion angle of the central ether group is
ꢁ71.5 (12)ꢂ (Fig. 1a). In (II), the torsion angle has changed to
ꢁ70.1 (9)ꢂ (Fig. 1b), and in (III), the corresponding torsion
angle is 77.9 (7)ꢂ (Fig. 1c). The sign of the torsion angle in (III)
is opposite to that in (I) and (II), indicating a difference of
some 150ꢂ between these torsion angles in the structures, so
the ethylene bridge is oriented quite differently in (III) to the
corresponding bridges in (I) and (II), as can be seen in Fig. 1.
m156 # 2012 International Union of Crystallography
doi:10.1107/S0108270112019075
Acta Cryst. (2012). C68, m156–m160