We now describe the first organocatalytic one-pot oxida-
tive cleavage of terminal 1,2-diols to dehomologated
carboxylic acids with a wide range of substrate applic-
abilities, featuring the combineduse of cat.1-Me-AZADO/
cat.NaOCl/NaClO2.
Nitroxyl-radical-catalyzed alcohol oxidation has at-
tracted much attention owing to its versatile utility sup-
ported by diverse sets of catalyst and terminal oxidant
availabilities.10ꢀ13 2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidine 1-oxyl
(TEMPO, 1) is a representative of this type of catalyst. A
less hindered class of nitroxyl radical 2-azaadamantane
N-oxyls (AZADOs) (2, 3),8a,b,f,g 9-azabicyclo[3.3.1]-nonane
N-oxyl (ABNO) (4),8c and 9-azanoradamantane N-oxyl
(Nor-AZADO) (5)8e have been developed as more reactive
nitroxyl radical catalysts (Figure 1).
carboxylic acid has been published;14 however, it focused
on the development of a column-flow alcohol oxidation
system using immobilized TEMPO with few examples of
oxidative cleavage. Stark et al. have also recently reported
TPAP-catalyzed vicinal diol cleavage to carboxylic acids
as a new synthetic method.15 Because of the efficiency and
mildness of the nitroxyl-radical-catalyzed method as well
as its eco- and user-friendliness, we thought it useful to
clarify the scope of nitroxyl-radical-catalyzed oxidative
cleavage.16 Furthermore, highly active AZADOs could
expand the scope of TEMPO-catalyzed oxidative cleavage.
Comparing 1-Me-AZADO (3) with TEMPO (1), we
examined the substrate applicability of this method
(Table 1).17ꢀ19 As expected, the simple 1,2-diols 6a, 7a,
and 8a efficiently underwent the desired reaction using
either catalyst. The phenylacetylene 9a yielded its corre-
sponding one-carbon-unit-shorter carboxylic acid 9c accom-
panied by less than 5% benzoic acid under the 1-Me-
AZADO-catalyzed conditions, whereas 12% benzoic acid
was obtained under the TEMPO-catalyzed conditions
(entry 4). For the entries 5ꢀ7, 9, and 10, the differences
between 1-Me-AZADO and TEMPO became clear. The
conversions from 2-hydroxy acids to one-carbon-unit-
shorter carboxylic acids were more efficiently promoted
under the 1-Me-AZADO-catalyzed conditions than under
Figure 1. Structures of nitroxyl radicals.
In light of the inherent stereodiscriminable properties of
TEMPO,1 we first evaluated the possibility of TEMPO-
catalyzed oxidation to conduct the selective oxidation of
1,2-diols to their corresponding 2-hydroxy acids, employing
cat.NaOCl/NaClO2 (Zhao’s procedure),13b,d which offers
an efficient one-pot oxidation of primary alcohols to their
corresponding carboxylic acids. While attempting the oxida-
tion of 1,2-diol 6a under Zhao’s conditions, we unexpectedly
found that smooth and clean oxidative CꢀC cleavage from
the 2-hydroxy acid 6b to the one-carbon-unit-shorter car-
boxylic acid 6c takes place (Scheme 1).
At the outset of this reaction, only 2-hydroxy acid was
detected by analytical TLC. As the reaction approached
completion, CꢀC bond cleavage took place exclusively to
afford the one-carbon-unit-shorter carboxylic acid 6c with-
out any intermediate other than the 2-hydroxy acid 6b being
detected. One report including a nitroxyl-radical-catalyzed
direct cleavage reaction from 1,2-diol to dehomologated
Scheme 1. Unexpected Oxidative Cleavage
TEMPO-catalyzed conditions. Thus, the corresponding
2-hydroxy acids were obtained after 24 h under the
TEMPO-catalyzed conditions in moderate yield (the
yields are shown in Table 1). No epimerization of an
adjacent stereocenter was detected under either set of
catalyst-catalyzed conditions (entries 5ꢀ10). Note that
the methoxy diol 13a and the N-protected amino diols 14a
and 15a efficiently underwent one-pot oxidative cleavage
without racemization under the 1-Me-AZADO-catalyzed
conditions (entries 8ꢀ10).20,21 The optically active diols
13a and 14a were prepared by Sharpless asymmetric
epoxidation and acid-catalyzed nucleophilic ring opening
(10) (a) de Nooy, A. E. J.; Besemer, A. C.; van Bekkum, H. Synthesis
1996, 1153–1174. (b) Vogler, T.; Studer, A. Synthesis 2008, 1979–1993. (c)
Bobbitt, J. M.; Brockner, C.; Merbouh, N. Org. React. 2009, 74, 103–424.
(11) (a) Dugger, R. W.; Ragan, J. A.; Ripin, D. H. B. Org. Process
Res. Dev. 2005, 9, 253–258. (b) Caron, S.; Dugger, R. W.; Ruggeri, S. G.;
Ragan, J. A.; Ripin, D. H. B. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 2943–2989. (c)
Ciriminna, R.; Pagliaro, M. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2010, 14, 245–251.
(12) (a) Anelli, P. L.; Biffi, C.; Montanari, F.; Quici, S. J. Org. Chem.
1987, 52, 2559–2562. (b) De Mico, A.; Margarita, R.; Parlanti, L.; Vescovi,
A.; Piancatelli, G. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6974–6977. (c) Bolm, C.;
Magnus, A. S.; Hildebrand, J. P. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1173–1175. (d) Miller,
R. A.; Hoerrner, R. S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 285–287. (e) Liu, R. H.; Liang,
X. M.; Dong, C. Y.; Hu, X. Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4112–4113.
(13) (a) Epp, J. B.; Widlanski, T. S. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 293–295. (b)
Zhao, M. Z.; Li, J.; Mano, E.; Song, Z. G.; Tschaen, D. M.; Grabowski,
E. J. J.; Reider, P. J. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 2564–2566. (c) Zanka, A. Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 2003, 51, 888–889. (d) Zhao, M. M.; Li, J.; Mano, E.; Song,
Z. J.; Tschaen, D. M. Org. Synth. 2005, 81, 195–203.
(15) Schmidt, A.-K. C.; Stark, C. B. W. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 5788–
5791.
(16) Selected recent examples of two-step transformation of 1,2-diol
to one-carbon-unit-shorter carboxylic acid: (a) Parker, K. A.; Lim,
Y. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15968–15969. (b) Koizumi, Y.;
Kobayashi, H.; Wakimoto, T.; Furuta, T.; Fukuyama, T.; Kan, T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16854–16855. (c) Ramana, C. V.;
Khaladkar, T. P.; Chatterjee, S.; Gurjar, M. K. J. Org. Chem. 2008,
73, 3817–3822. (d) Mohapatra, D. K.; Sahoo, G.; Ramesh, D. K.; Rao,
J. S.; Sastry, G. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 5636–5639. (e) Lu, Y.;
Woo, S. K.; Krische, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 13876–13879.
(f) Zhang, Y. A.; Rohanna, J.; Zhou, J.; Iyer, K.; Rainier, J. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3208–3216.
(14) Tanaka, H.; Chou, J. Y.; Mine, M.; Kuroboshi, M. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 2004, 77, 1745–1755.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 19, 2012
5007