REPORTS
18. S. Hanashima, S. Manabe, Y. Ito, Angew. Chem. Int.
compounds A to D and compounds I and J; two this motif is also present in triantennary glycans
biantennary compounds that have one branch 22 and 24, which are not recognized by this HA.
modified with a LacNAc structure (Fig. 4). Of the Compounds L and 26 also have in common at
synthetic triantennary compounds, ECA lectin least two Neu5Aca(2–6) epitopes on different
bound strongly to 25 and weakly to 22 to 24. The antennae, but so do compounds K and 25, which
latter compounds contain LacNAc substituted have a single LacNAc extension and are not recog-
with a fucoside, which is known to reduce the af- nized. These results reflect differences in the spec-
finity of ECA (33). By contrast, the fucose-specific ificity of these HAs, and not simple differences
Aleuria aurantia lectin (AAL) robustly recognized in avidity, because similar array results were ob-
the fucoside containing glycans 22 to 24 as well tained when the concentration of the HA applied
as the three reference compounds containing a to the array was titrated down in twofold dilu-
Lex epitope (E, F, and M). Sambuccus nigra ag- tions from 100 to 6 mg/ml (fig. S24).
Ed. Engl. 44, 4218–4224 (2005).
19. S. Jonke, K. G. Liu, R. R. Schmidt, Chemistry 12, 1274–1290
(2006).
20. B. Sun, B. Srinivasan, X. F. Huang, Chemistry 14, 7072–7081
(2008).
21. C. Unverzagt et al., Chemistry 15, 12292–12302 (2009).
22. S. Serna, J. Etxebarria, N. Ruiz, M. Martin-Lomas,
N. C. Reichardt, Chemistry 16, 13163–13175 (2010).
23. M. A. Walczak, S. J. Danishefsky, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134,
16430–16433 (2012).
24. O. Bohorov, H. Andersson-Sand, J. Hoffmann, O. Blixt,
Glycobiology 16, 21C–27C (2006).
25. R. R. Schmidt, W. Kinzy, Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem.
50, 21–123 (1994).
glutinin (SNA) specific for terminal a(2-6)Neu5Ac
recognized all structures containing this epitope topes presented on asymmetrically branched
(G to L and 22 to 26). N-linked glycans can be distinguished from the
These results demonstrate that glycan epi-
26. B. Yu, H. C. Tao, Tetrahedron Lett. 42, 2405–2407
(2001).
27. G. Spik, V. Debruyne, J. Montreuil, H. van Halbeek,
J. F. Vliegenthart, FEBS Lett. 183, 65–69 (1985).
28. More then 800 expression constructs of human
glycosylation enzymes in multiple expression vectors and
protocols to produce the enzymes for biochemical,
enzymatic synthesis, and structural studies are available
Influenza viruses recognize sialic acids as same epitopes on linear or symmetrically branched
receptors, and it is well documented human and glycans. Such context-dependent recognition can
avian viruses exhibit differential specificity for be due to extended binding sites, unfavorable in-
glycans with Neu5Aca(2-6)Gal and Neu5Aca teractions by neighboring antennae, and multiva-
(2-3)Gal linkages, respectively. This difference in lency by proper spacing of minimal epitopes at
specificity represents a major barrier for trans- two or more antennae. As illustrated by the se-
mission of avian viruses to humans (34, 35), and lected influenza HAs, these differences are rele-
increasing attention is placed on glycan micro- vant to the recognition of receptors by human
array analysis to understand the receptor require- pathogens. A complete understanding of influ-
ments of avian and human virus hemagglutinins enza receptor specificity and its relevance to
(HAs) required for species tropism (36–38). To adaptation of animal viruses to human hosts will
assess the potential for influenza HA to distin- require an extensive panel of asymmetric and sym-
guish between symmetric and asymmetric gly- metric glycan structures representative of those
cans, we evaluated the specificity of an HA from found on human and animal airway epithelia (38).
an exemplary H5N1 avian virus (VN/04), a human Such libraries of glycans, which can be produced
seasonal H1N1 virus (KY/07), and an H1N1 virus by the methodology presented here, will begin to
29. O. Blixt, N. Razi, Methods Enzymol. 415, 137–153
(2006).
30. W. Wang et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106,
16096–16101 (2009).
31. B. Sauerzapfe et al., Glycoconj. J. 26, 141–159 (2009).
32. O. Blixt et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101,
17033–17038 (2004).
33. Y. Itakura et al., J. Biochem. 142, 459–469 (2007).
34. A. Chandrasekaran et al., Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 107–113
(2008).
35. M. Imai, Y. Kawaoka, Curr. Opin. Virol. 2, 160–167 (2012).
36. L. M. Chen et al., Virology 422, 105–113 (2012).
37. M. B. Pearce et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109,
3944–3949 (2012).
38. T. Walther et al., PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003223 (2013).
39. J. Stevens et al., Science 312, 404–410 (2006).
40. Y. van Kooyk, G. A. Rabinovich, Nat. Immunol. 9,
593–601 (2008).
from the 2009 influenza pandemic (CA/05).
define the human glycome and provide tools to
The H5 HA from VN/04 recognized com- understand the biology mediated by both micro-
pounds N to Q and 27, which contain the bial and mammalian glycan-binding proteins that
Neu5Aca(2-3)Gal, consistent with the consensus mediate host pathogen interactions and innate and
receptor specificity of avian viruses (34, 39). adaptive immune responses (13, 40).
Notably, this cloned HA did not recognize the
Acknowledgments: This research was supported by NIH grant
P41RR005351 from the National Center for Research
Resources (G.J.-B. and J.G.), National Institute of General
Medical Sciences grants P41GM103390 (G.J.B. and J.G.) and
R01GM090269 (G.J.-B.), Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Disease grant AI058113 (J.C.P.), and a contract from the
Centers for Disease Control (J.C.P.). R.P.d.V. is a recipient of
a Rubicon grant from the Netherlands Organization for
Scientific Research (NWO). We thank A. Crie and M. Wolfert for
assistance in preparation of the manuscript, K. Moremen
(University of Georgia) for providing ST6Gal-1 and ST3Gal-IV,
and P. Wu (Albert Einstein College of Medicine) and
Neu5Aca(2-3)Gal in the fucosylated sequence
References and Notes
SLex in compound 22 or the reference compound
1. G. W. Hart, R. J. Copeland, Cell 143, 672–676 (2010).
2. H. H. Freeze, Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 537–551 (2006).
3. K. Ohtsubo, J. D. Marth, Cell 126, 855–867 (2006).
4. S. J. North, P. G. Hitchen, S. M. Haslam, A. Dell,
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 19, 498–506 (2009).
5. K. Mariño, J. Bones, J. J. Kattla, P. M. Rudd, Nat. Chem. Biol.
6, 713–723 (2010).
M. By contrast, the HA from the two human in-
fluenza viruses exhibited binding only to gly-
cans containing the Neu5Aca(2-6)Gal epitope
(Fig. 4), but otherwise exhibited different fine
specificities. The HA from the H1N1 seasonal
strain A/Kentucky/07 (KY/07) recognized all the
reference compounds (G to L) and all the tri-
antennary compounds (22 to 26) that contained
this linkage. However, relative to the linear ref-
erence compounds (G and H), the compounds
that have a Neu5Aca(2–6)Gal moiety on only
one branch of a biantennary glycan were bound
weakly (I and J), whereas those that had the
Neu5Aca (2–6)Gal sequence on only one branch
of the triantennary glycans (23, 24) were rec-
ognized equally well. Thus, this HA distinguishes
structures with a single sialic acid in the context
of linear or biantennary and triantennary chain
N-linked glycan chains. More pronounced differ-
ences are seen when comparing the seasonal
H1 and the pandemic HA H1 from A/California/
05/09 (CA/05). The CA/05 HA recognized only
reference compounds H and L and a single tri-
antennary glycan, namely 26. These compounds
have in common the Neu5Aca(2–6) epitope linked
to an extended dimeric-LacNAc moiety. However,
6. N. Laurent, J. Voglmeir, S. L. Flitsch, Chem. Commun.
(Camb.) (37): 4400–4412 (2008).
W. Wakarchuk (Ryerson University) for providing the plasmids
for a1,3FucT and b1,3GlcNAcT, respectively. G.J.-B. conceived
the idea, Z.W. performed the chemical synthesis, S.G.A. assisted
with chemical synthesis, Z.S.C. performed the enzymatic
7. T. J. Boltje, T. Buskas, G. J. Boons, Nat. Chem. 1,
611–622 (2009).
8. B. Lepenies, J. Yin, P. H. Seeberger, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
transformations, and W.P. and Z.W. assisted with the enzymatic
transformation. Z.S.C. and J.G. performed the analysis of the
complex glycans. W.P. performed the attachment of the reactive
linker to the glycans, R.M. performed the microarray screening,
R.P.d.V. prepared the influenza HA, and J.C.P. supervised and
analyzed the microarray studies. G.J.-B. and J.C.P. wrote the paper.
The data for this report are archived as supplementary materials
on Science Online. A patent application related to the described
chemoenzymatic approach has been filed by the University of
Georgia Research Foundation and lists G.J.-B and Z.W. as
inventors. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
14, 404–411 (2010).
9. X. M. Zhu, R. R. Schmidt, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 48,
1900–1934 (2009).
10. M. M. Palcic, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 15, 226–233 (2011).
11. R. M. Schmaltz, S. R. Hanson, C. H. Wong, Chem. Rev.
111, 4259–4307 (2011).
12. K. W. Moremen, M. Tiemeyer, A. V. Nairn, Nat. Rev. Mol.
Cell Biol. 13, 448–462 (2012).
13. C. D. Rillahan, J. C. Paulson, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80,
797–823 (2011).
14. H. J. Gabius, S. André, J. Jiménez-Barbero, A. Romero,
D. Solís, Trends Biochem. Sci. 36, 298–313 (2011).
15. R. Ranzinger, M. Frank, C. W. von der Lieth, S. Herget,
Glycobiology 19, 1563–1567 (2009).
Supplementary Materials
Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S24
Tables S1 to S14
16. Analysis of the glycome-DB database shows that 85% of
known glycan structures are asymmetrical. Almost all of
the known N-linked glycans have fewer than 25
monosaccharides, and such compounds should be
accessible by the strategy presented here.
17. C. Unverzagt, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 35, 2350–2353
(1996).
References (41–48)
Copies of NMR Spectra
7 February 2013; accepted 14 June 2013
10.1126/science.1236231
383