ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Tetrahedron
7
157.9 ppm. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for [M–I]+ 524.30602;
References
found 524.30609.
1. Reichardt, C. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic
Chemistry, WILEY-VCH, Weinheim, 2003.
2. Dawber, J. G.; Williams, R. A. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans.
1 1986, 82, 3097–3112.
4.5. Synthesis of 1-butyl-4-(9-butyl-7-(diphenylamino)-
9H-carbazol-2-yl)pyridinium tetraphenylborate (OD4)
3. Dawber, J. G.; Williams, R. A. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans.
1993, 89, 55–57.
4. Reichardt, C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1992, 21, 147–153.
5. Laus, G.; Schottenberger, H.; Wurst, K.; Schütz, J.; Ongania,
K.-H.; Horvatch, U. E. I.; Schwärzler, A. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2003, 1, 1409–1418.
6. Masternak, A.; Wenska, G.; Milecki, J.; Skalski, B.; Franzen,
S.; J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 759–766.
7. Sarkar, A.; Trivedi, S.; Pandey, S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008,
OD3
tetraphenylborate salt OD4 as dark brown solids by
precipitation from acetonitrile/water NaBPh4;
was
metathesized
to the
corresponding
decomposition 187 °C. IR (ATR): ν = 1621, 732, 702 cm-1.
1H NMR (500 MHz, acetone-d6): δ = 0.84 (t, J = 7.5 Hz,
3H), 1.00 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.25–1.31 (m, 2H), 1.45–1.50
(m, 2H), 1.76–1.82 (m, 2H), 2.12–2.17 (m, 2H), 4.41 (t, J =
7.0 Hz, 2H), 4.77 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.75–6.79 (m, 3H),
6.92–6.97 (m, 6H), 6.98 (dd, J = 2.0 and 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.09–
7.12 (m, 2H), 7.14–7.17 (m, 4H), 7.24 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H),
7.33–7.36 (m, 10H), 7.89 (dd, J = 2.0 and 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.13
(d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.30–8.32 (m, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.65 (d,
J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 9.06 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR
(500 MHz, acetone-d6): δ = 13.8, 14.1, 20.1, 21.0, 31.9,
34.0, 43.2, 61.4, 105.0, 109.6, 117.8, 118.1, 119.8, 121.7,
122.3, 122.9, 124.2, 125.3, 125.5, 126.00, 126.02, 126.05,
126.07, 127.3, 130.3, 130.5, 137.01, 137.03, 137.04, 137.05,
142.2, 144.2, 145.1, 148.9, 149.1, 157.9, 164.4, 164.8,
165.2, 165.6 ppm. HRMS (ESI): calcd. for [M–BPh4]+
524.30602; found 524.30591.
112, 9042–9049.
8. Huang, Y.; Cheng, T.; Li, F.; Luo, C.; H. Huang, C.; Cai, Z.;
Zeng, X.; Zhon, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 4475–4481.
9. Aimi, J.; Nagamine, Y.; Tsuda, A.; Muranaka, A.; Uchiyama,
M.; Aida, T. Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 5231–5234; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5153–5156.
10. Bolz, I.; Schaarschmidt, D.; Rüffer, T.; Lang, H.; Spange, S.
Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 7576–7579; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2009, 48, 7440–7443.
11. Bureš, F.; Pytela, O.; Kivala, M.; Diederich, F. J. Phys. Org.
Chem. 2011, 24, 274–281.
12. (a) Kulinich, A. V.; Derevyanko, N. A.; Mikitenko, E. K.;
Ishchenko, A. A. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2011, 24, 732–742; (b)
Hrobárik, P.; Hrobáriková, V.; sigmundová, I.; Zahradník, P.;
Fakis, M.; Polyzos, I.; Persephonis, P. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76,
8726–8736; (c) Giordano, L.; Shvadchak, V. V.; Fauerbach, J.
A.; Jares-Erijman E. A.; Jovin, T. M. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
2012, 3, 1011–1016.
13. (a) Gawinecki, R.; Trzebiatowska K. Polish J. Chem. 2001,
75, 231–239; (b) Turshatov, A. A.; Möbius, D.; Bossi, M. L.;
Hell, S. W.; Vedernikov, A. I.; Lobova, N. A.; Gromov, S. P.;
Alfimov, M. V.; Zaitsev, S. Y. Langmuir 2006, 22, 1571–
1579; (c) Hrobárik, P.; Horváth, B.; Sigmundová, I.;
Zahradník, P.; Malkina, O. L. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2007, 45,
942–953.
14. Coe, B. J.; Harris, J. A.; Hall, J. J.; Brunschwig, B. S.; Hung,
S.-T.; Libaers, W.; Clay, K.; Coles, S. J.; Horton, P. N.; Light,
M. E.; Hursthouse, M. B.; Garín, J.; Orduna, J. Chem. Mater.
2006, 18, 5907–5918.
15. Jacques, P. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 5535.
16. Gaines, G. L. Jr. Angew. Chem. 1987, 99, 346–348; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 1987, 26, 341–342.
4.6. Computational methods
The semi-empirical calculations were carried out with the
WinMOPAC Ver. 3.9 package (Fujitsu, Chiba, Japan).
Geometry calculation of compound 2 in the ground state
was made using the AM1 method.36 The geometry was
completely optimized (keyword PRECISE) by the
eigenvector following routine (keyword EF). Experimental
absorption spectra of the compound was compared with
their absorption data by the semi-empirical method
INDO/S
(intermediate
neglect
of
differential
overlap/spectroscopic)35 using the SCRF Onsager Model.
All INDO/S calculations were performed using single
excitation full SCF/CI (self-consistent field/configuration
interaction), which includes the configuration with one
electron excited from any occupied orbital to any
unoccupied orbital, where 100 configurations were
considered [keyword CI (15 15)].
17. Testoni, F. M.; Riberio, E. A.; Giusti, L. A.; Machado, V. G.
Spectrochim. Acta A 2009, 71, 1704–1711.
18. Botrel, A.; Beuze, A.; Jacques, P.; Strub, H. J. Chem. Soc.
Faraday Trans. 1984, 80, 1235–1252.
19. Morley, J. O.; Morley, R. M.; Docherty, R.; Charlton, M. H.;
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10192–10202.
20. Huang, Y.; Cheng, T.; Li, F.; Luo, C.; Huang, C. H.; Cai, Z.;
Zeng, X.; Zhon, J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 10031–10040.
21. Panigrahi, M.; Dash, S.; Patel, S.; Behera, P. K.; Mishra, B. K.
Spectrochim. Acta A 2007, 68, 757–762.
Keywords: Pyridinium dye; Solvatochromism; Donor-pi-
acceptor system; Halogenated solvent; Halogen-halide
anion interaction
Acknowledgments
22. Dumur, F.; Mayer, C. R.; Dumas, E.; Miomandre, F.; Frigoil,
M.; Sécheresse, F. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 321–324.
23. Abdel-Halim, S. T.; Awad, M. K. J. Mol. Struct. 2009, 920,
323–341.
24. Ooyama, Y.; Asada, R.; Inoue, S.; Komaguchi, K.; Imae, I.;
Harima, Y. New J. Chem. 2009, 33, 2311–2316.
25. Hrobárik, P.; Sigmundová, I.; Zahradník, P.; Kasák, P.; Arion,
V.; Franz, E.; Clays, K. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 22289–
22302.
This work was supported by the Japan Society for the
Promotion of Science (JSPS) (Grants-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (B) (23350097) and (C) (24550225)). Y. O. also
acknowledges the UBE Foundation.
26. Hou, J.; Wu, X. Synth. Met. 2011, 161, 1194.