.
Angewandte
Communications
Table 1: Reaction optimization.
reported by the research group of Liebeskind and represents
a practical method for accessing various phenols and qui-
nones.[13,14] Later, the research groups of Kondo and Mitsudo
successfully extended the scope of the reaction to electron-
deficient olefins, norbornene, and ethylene by using rhodium
and ruthenium catalysts.[15] Recently, the insertion of alky-
nylboronates into cyclobutenones was reported by Auvinet
and Harrity.[16] The activation of cyclobutanones was first
reported by the research group of Murakami (Scheme 2a).[17]
Murakami et al. subsequently reported a catalyzed intra-
molecular insertion of styrene-type olefins into cyclobuta-
nones to give [3.1.2] bicycles.[18,19] More recently, the research
group of Murakami reported a nickel-catalyzed addition of
alkynes and alkenes to cyclobutanones through oxidative
cyclization and b-carbon elimination.[20]
Entry
Ligand
Bite angle [8][a]
Conversion [%][b]
Yield [%][b]
[c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PPh3
N/A
N/A
N/A
72
85
91
24
58
40
7
11
14
5
none
[d]
PPh3
dppm
dppe
dppp
dppb
dppb[e]
23
62
5
77
>99
>99
46
88
84
98
98
[a] The bite angle was obtained from Ref. [26]. [b] Determined by
1H NMR spectroscopy using mesitylene as the internal standard.
[c] Wilkinson’s catalyst was used. [d] 24 mol% of PPh3 was used.
[e] ZnCl2 (20 mol%) was added and THF was used as solvent. cod=1,5-
cyclooctadiene, dppm=1,1-bis(diphenylphosphino)methane,
dppe=1,1-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane, dppp=1,1-bis(diphenyl-
phosphino)propane, dppb=1,1-bis(diphenylphosphino)butane,
N/A=not applicable.
We wanted to explore the feasibility of using such a cut-
and-sew approach to access fused rings by investigating
benzocyclobutenones. The intramolecular insertion of olefins
À
into the C1 C2 s bond of benzocyclobutenones would lead to
benzofused tricycles (Scheme 2b), which are key motifs in
a
number of biologically important natural products
(Scheme 3).[21] However, there are a number of challenges:
entries 2 and 3, is attributed to decomposition of 1a,
presumably in the form of undesired decarbonylation.[18]
A
series of bidentate phosphine ligands were examined. Inter-
estingly, the yields and conversions correlate well with the
bite angle of these ligands (dppb > dppp > dppe > dppm;
Table 1, entries 4–7), and the highest yield (88%) was
obtained using dppb (Table 1, entry 7).[25]
The efficacy of dppb can be tentatively attributed to its
large bite angle because it then engenders a metal complex
that is unsuitable for promoting the undesired decarbon-
ylation pathway, owing to the blockage of potential coordi-
nation sites on the rhodium atom; this feature also promotes
both migratory insertion and reductive elimination.[27] In
contrast, the use of the combination of [Rh(cod)Cl]2 and
dppm gave a conversion and yield that was similar to those
obtained when Wilkinsonꢀs catalyst was used (Table 1,
entry 4); starting material decomposition was observed
when dppe was used (Table 1, entry 5). In addition, the
presence of the Lewis acid, ZnCl2, is compatible with the
carboacylation reaction[28] and a high yield was obtained
(Table 1, entry 8). Furthermore, control experiments indi-
cated that no desired product 2a was formed in the absence of
a rhodium catalyst either in the presence or in the absence of
ZnCl2. The tricyclic product 2a was unambiguously identified
by 1H, 13C NMR, and IR spectroscopy, as well as HRMS and
X-ray crystallography (see the Supporting Information).
With optimized reaction conditions established, we next
investigated the scope of this reaction (Table 2). As expected,
1,1-disubstituted olefins were converted into the correspond-
ing fused-ring products, which contained all-carbon quater-
nary carbon centers, in good to excellent yield (Table 2,
entries 1–7). The presence of both electron-donating and
electron-withdrawing substituents on the benzocyclobute-
nones were tolerated (Table 2, entries 2 and 3). Moreover, the
presence of esters, TBS silyl ethers, and styrene moieties were
Scheme 3. Representative natural products.
1) achieving the desired regioselectivity is not trivial, because,
À
in general, cleavage of the C1 C8 bond of benzocyclobute-
nones is kinetically favored and therefore catalyzed trans-
À
formations that involve the cleavage of the C1 C2 bond
remain elusive; 2) the scope of olefins that can undergo
carboacylation is often limited.[22] Herein, we describe the
development of a rhodium-catalyzed regioselective olefin
carboacylation reaction of benzocyclobutenones for rapid
access to polyfused rings.[23]
To convert benzocyclobutenone 1a[24] into tricyclic ketone
2a, Wilkinsonꢀs catalyst was investigated initially (Table 1,
entry 1). To our delight, the desired product was isolated
albeit with low conversion, thus showing that activation had
À
occurred at the unusual C1 C2 bond. The yield was slightly
higher when Wilkinsonꢀs catalyst was generated in situ by
mixing [Rh(cod)Cl]2 and PPh3 (Table 1, entry 3). When
[Rh(cod)Cl]2 was used in the absence of additional ligand,
58% conversion was observed and the product was isolated in
11% yield, thus indicating that the intermediate, that is, the
diene–metal complex, is still reactive although it does not
react very selectively. The discrepancy between the conver-
sion of substrate and the yield of product, as in Table 1,
2
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!