energy transfer (FRET)5 and through-bond energy trans-
fer (TBET).6 While photoinduced intramolecular charge
transfer (ICT) has been utilized with the aim of achieving
a large Stokes shift in common organic systems, this strategy
has rarely been adopted in BODIPYs and their analogues.7
We are interested in the design and synthesis of naphthyr-
idine-based BF2 complexes with intriguing luminescence
properties. Previously, we reported a bis(BF2) core complex
containing 1,8-naphthyridine units; the complex displayed a
yellow-green emission with a fluorescence quantum yield up
to 0.965 in dichloromethane.8 Similar to most BODIPYs
and their analogues, this naphthyridineꢀBF2 complex ex-
hibited faint photoluminescence in the solid state. By con-
trolling the molecular arrangements and the number of πꢀπ
interactions in the solid state, we then successfully obtained
solid-state emissive 1,8-naphthyridineꢀBF2 complexes.9
One significant deficit in the properties of these dyes is their
generally small Stokes shift. In the present work, we propose
to develop solid-emissive 1,8-naphthyridineꢀBF2 complexes
with large Stokes shifts. Our strategy involves the incorpora-
tion of an electron-donating dimethylamino aryl group into
the 1,8-naphthyridineꢀBF2 moiety, which is anticipated to
result in a pushꢀpull system in view of the fact that the
naphthyridine unit is a well-known acceptor. Indeed, the
newly synthesized donorꢀacceptor compounds (Scheme 1)
were found to exhibit efficient intramolecular charge-transfer
(ICT) emission in polar solvents with relatively large Stokes
shifts and strong solvatochromism. For comparison, com-
plexes 3b and 4b with a relatively neutral group (H for 3b)
or an electron-withdrawing group (COOMe for 4b) on
the p-position of the phenyl ring have also been prepared.
8-naphthyridine or 2-amino-5,7-di(trifluoromethyl)-1,8-naph-
thyridine.10 The raw materials were converted to 1aꢀ4a by
reacting with p-substituted methyl benzoate in dry THF with
sodium hydride as a base; the resulting amido ligands were
treated with BF3 Et2O in dry chloroform in the presence
3
of triethylamine at rt to afford the desired fluorineꢀ
boron complexes 1bꢀ4b in high yields. All compounds
synthesized were fully characterized by multinuclear
NMR spectroscopy, ESI-MS, infrared spectroscopy, and
elemental analyses. It is notable that the strong IR absorp-
tion peaks at ∼1700 cmꢀ1, related to the CdO stretch
vibration of the precursors 1aꢀ4a, vanished after coordina-
tion with BF3 (Figure S1). Details of the experimental pro-
cedures and data for structural characterization were
described in the Supporting Information (SI).
Figure 1. ORTEP diagrams for 1b (left) and 3b (right) showing
30% probability ellipsoids. All H-atoms are omitted for clarity.
Single crystals of complexes 1b, 2b, and 3b suitable for
X-ray diffraction analysis were grown by slow diffusion of
diethyl ether vapors into a dichloromethane solution.
Single crystals of the precursor 3a and 4a were also ob-
tained by evaporating their dichloromethane solutions at rt.
Detailed crystallographic data were summarized in Table S1.
Complex 1b crystallizes in an orthorhombic lattice with-
out solvates. The central B-atom has a slightly distorted
tetrahedron geometry with BꢀF, BꢀN, BꢀO distances of
Scheme 1. Synthetic Routes and Chemical Structures of 1bꢀ4b
˚
1.3795(2), 1.579(3), 1.471(3) A, respectively, and bond angles
around the B-atom ranging from 107.36(1)° to 112.47(2)°.
These values for bond lengths and bond angles are normal for
N,O-chelated BF2 complexes.11 As depicted in Figures 1 and
S2, the entire molecule of 1b is near coplanar, and all portions
except for two F-atoms are located in the same plane; this
suggests the formation of an extended π-conjugation system
and is favorable for intramolecular charge transfer. The
πꢀπ stacking interactions were found to exist along the
As shown in Scheme 1, the naphthyridineꢀBF2 com-
pounds were successfully obtained by a facile two-step
synthetic route starting from 2-amino-5,7-dimethyl-1,
(7) (a) Peng, X.; Song, F.; Lu, E.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Fan, J.; Gao, Y.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4170–4171. (b) Zhou, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Chi, S.;
Qian, X. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 633–636. (c) Frath, D.; Azizi, S.; Ulrich, G.;
Retailleau, P.; Ziessel, R. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3414–3417. (d) Martin, A.;
Long, C.; Forster, R. J.; Keyes, T. E. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 5617–5619.
(8) Li, H. F. J.; Fu, W. F.; Li, L.; Gan, X.; Mu, W. H.; Chen, W. Q.;
Duan, X. M.; Song, H. B. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2924–2927.
(9) Quan, L.; Chen, Y.; Lv, X. J.; Fu, W. F. Chem.;Eur. J.
2012 DOI: 10.1002/chem.201201592.
(10) Henry, R. A.; Hammond, P. R. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1977, 14,
1109–1112.
(11) Hachiya, S.; Inagaki, T.; Hashizume, D.; Maki, S.; Niwa, H.;
Hirano, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 1613–1615.
(5) (a) Coskun, A.; Akkaya, E. U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
10464–10465. (b) Coskun, A.; Akkaya, E. U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 14474–14475. (c) Belman, N.; Israelachvili, J. N.; Li, Y.; Safinya,
C. R.; Bernstein, J.; Golan, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9007–9013.
(d) Harriman, A.; Mallon, L. J.; Elliot, K. J.; Haefele, A.; Ulrich, G.;
Ziessel, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13375–13386. (e) Ziessel, R.;
Rihn, S.; Harriman, A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 11942–11953. (f)
Ziessel, R.; Harriman, A. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 611–631.
(6) (a) Zhao, Y.;Zhang, Y.; Lv, X.; Liu, Y.;Chen, M.; Wang, P.;Liu, J.;
Guo, W. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 13168–13171. (b) Qu, X.; Liu, Q.; Ji, X.;
Chen, H.; Zhou, Z.; Shen, Z. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 4600–4602.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 20, 2012
5227