P.E. Hansen et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 98 (2012) 247–251
251
(3). The NMR spectra were recorded in CD3CN in order to mimic
the 3-methoxypropionitrile of the solar cell, and low concentra-
tions of 4TBP (0.30 M) are used in order to eliminate the influence
of ring current effects. For the ratios I2:4TBP of 0.1 and 0.5 only one
set of resonances are seen, indicating that the forward and reverse
reactions of Eq. (3) are fast compared with the NMR time scale,
with the result that only the weighted 13C-shifts of 4TBP and 4
are observed. When an equivalent amount of I2 is added to 4TBP
in CD3CN, a major and a minor set of 13C resonances are seen (Ta-
ble 2). The 13C chemical shifts of the minor component is identical
to the 13C shifts of 3 in CD3CN. When the I2: 4TBP ratio is increased
from 0 to 1 the C-4 shift changes from 160 to 165 ppm which is
very close to the C-4 shift 165 ppm of the orange charge transfer
product 4 in CD3CN (Table 2). The 165 ppm shift of the 1:1 titration
is therefore likely to be close to the end titration value indicating
that more than 90% of the 4TBP is converted to the CT complex
4. A mole fraction of 4 > 0.9 corresponds to a CT equilibrium con-
stant K3 of Eq. (3) > 400 in reasonable agreement with the
K = 400 value found the reaction between 4-picoline and I2 in
nitrobenzene [32]. Attempts to titrate with excess I2 were unsuc-
cessful due to precipitation of 3.
DSC mechanisms based on the reactions indicated in Eqs. (1)
and (2).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Rita Buch and Annette Christensen for their
help in recording NMR spectra and Eva M Karlsen for the IR spec-
tra. Jørgen Skibsted is acknowledged for kindly recording the 13C
NMR solid state spectra and Ole Hammerich for his help.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References
[1] A. Hagfeldt, G. Boschloo, L.C. Sun, L. Kloo, H. Pettersson, Chem. Rev. 110 (2010)
6595–6663.
[2] M. Grätzel, Acc. Chem. Res. 42 (2009) 1788–1798.
[3] A. Hagfeldt, M. Grätzel, Acc. Chem. Res. 33 (2000) 269–277.
[4] M.K. Nazeeruddin, A. Kay, I. Rodicio, R. Humphrybaker, E. Muller, P. Liska, N.
Vlachopoulos, M. Grätzel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115 (1993) 6382–6390.
[5] B. Oregan, M. Grätzel, Nature 353 (1991) 737–740.
[6] J.M. Kroon, N.J. Bakker, H.J.P. Smit, P. Liska, K.R. Thampi, P. Wang, S.M.
Zakeeruddin, M. Grätzel, A. Hinsch, S. Hore, U. Wurfel, R. Sastrawan, J.R.
Durrant, E. Palomares, H. Pettersson, T. Gruszecki, J. Walter, K. Skupien, G.E.
Tulloch, Prog. Photovoltaics 15 (2007) 1–18.
In contrast, titrating 4TBP with (C4H9)4N+, I3ꢀ leads to no change
of the 13C chemical shifts in CD3CN or in 4-methoxypropionitrile
(Table 2). The presence of TiO2 or heating the NMR samples for
24 h at 85 °C does not make any difference either.
[7] G. Boschloo, L. Haggman, A. Hagfeldt, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006) 13144–
13150.
Heterocyclic bases and triiodide
[8] H. Kusama, H. Arakawa, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 160 (2003) 171–179.
[9] H. Kusama, H. Orita, H. Sugihara, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 92 (2008) 84–87.
[10] H. Kusama, H. Arakawa, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 85 (2005) 333–344.
[11] Z. Kebede, S.E. Lindquist, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 57 (1999) 259–275.
[12] P.T. Nguyen, A.R. Andersen, E.M. Skou, T. Lund, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 94
(2010) 1582–1590.
[13] B. Jones, G.J. Moody, J.D.R. Thomas, Inorg. Chem. 9 (1970) 114–119.
[14] C. Reid, R.S. Mulliken, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76 (1954) 3869–3874.
[15] J.D. Schuster II, J. Roberts, Org. Chem. 44 (1979) 2658–2662.
[16] L.F. Audrieth, E.J. Birr, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 55 (1933) 668–673.
[17] T. Tassaing, M. Besnard, J. Phys. Chem. A 101 (1997) 2803–2808.
[18] R.D. Bailey, G.W. Drake, M. Grabarczyk, T.W. Hanks, L.L. Hook, W.T.
Pennington, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 (1997) 2773–2779.
[19] O. Hassel, H. Hope, Acta Chem. Scand. 15 (1961) 407–416.
[20] E.M. Karlsen, J. Spanget-Larsen, Chem. Phys. Lett. 473 (2009) 227–232.
[21] L.M. Peter, J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) 6601–6612.
What happens when a heterocyclic base and triiodide are mixed
as in the DSC solar cell? From Eq. (2) one could get the impression
that Iꢀ3 mixed with 4TBP can lead to formation of (4TBP)2I+ cations.
However, the 13C NMR spectra show clearly that no interaction
takes place as no changes in the chemical shifts are observed at
all, in sharp contrast to mixing 4TBP with I2 (Table 2). This obser-
vation is consistent with the prediction that the reaction in Eq. (2)
is strongly endothermic:
D
G ꢃ þ15 kcal molꢀ1, K ꢃ 10ꢀ11 (S6).
Conclusion
13C NMR is a powerful tool in elucidating the interactions be-
tween species in the solar cell as demonstrated in the present case
with 4TBP, but this could be any heterocyclic aromatic compound.
It is demonstrated that the different species (4TBP)2I+, I3ꢀ and
4TBPꢁI2 can be identified. However, it is also shown that Iꢀ3 does
not interact significantly with 4TBP in acetonitrile or 4-methoxy-
propinitrile, not even in the presence of titanium dioxide or at ele-
vated temperature. The investigation is supported by the results of
DFT calculations, which are very useful for obtaining information
on species that cannot immediately be observed (such as 4TBPI+)
and in obtaining approximate thermodynamic data. The combined
experimental and theoretical results of the present investigation
demonstrate the need for a revision of the previously suggested
[22] J.M. Chalker, A.L. Thompson, B.G. Davis, Org. Synth. 87 (2010) 288–298.
[23] M. Frisch et al., Gaussian 09, Revision A02, Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT,
2009.
[24] A.D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98 (1993) 5648–5652.
[25] C.T. Lee, W.T. Yang, R.G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37 (1988) 785–789.
[26] N. Godbout, D.R. Salahub, J. Andzelm, E. Wimmer, Can. J. Chem. 70 (1992) 560–
571.
[27] C. Sosa, J. Andzelm, B.C. Elkin, E. Wimmer, K.D. Dobbs, D.A. Dixon, J. Phys.
Chem. 96 (1992) 6630–6636.
[28] J. Tomasi, B. Mennucci, R. Cammi, Chem. Rev. 105 (2005) 2999–3093.
[29] J. Datta, A. Bhattacharya, K.K. Kundu, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jap. 61 (1988) 1735–
1742.
[30] G. Boschloo, A. Hagfeldt, Acc. Chem. Res. 42 (2009) 1819–1826.
[31] E.K. Plyler, R.S. Mulliken, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 81 (1959) 823–826.
[32] G. Posskin, P. Huyskens, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. (1976) 337–344.