M. T. Blanda et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 7081–7084
7083
Figure 3. (a) Compound 3 with no Pirkle’s reagent added. (b) Compound 3 with 1 equiv of Pirkle’s reagent added. (c) Compound 3 with 2 equiv of
Pirkle’s reagent added.
5. Kanamathareddy, S.; Gutsche, C. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1993, 115, 6572–6579.
6. Neri, P.; Rocco, C.; Consoli, G. M. L.; Piattelli, M. J. Org.
Chem. 1993, 58, 6535–6537.
7. Janssen, R. G.; Verboom, W.; Harkema, S.; van Hummel,
G. J.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Pochini, A.; Ungaro, R.; Prados,
P.; de Mendoza, J. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Comm. 1993, 6,
506–508.
8. Otsuka, H.; Shinkai, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
4271–4275.
9. Erdemir, S.; Tabakci, M.; Yilmaz, M. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2006, 17, 1258–1263.
10. Guan, B.; Gong, S.; Wu, X.; Chen, Y. Tetrahedron Lett.
2005, 46, 6041–6044.
11. Kanamathareddy, S.; Gutsche, C. D. J. Org. Chem. 1992,
57, 3160–3166.
coupled signals designated by matching symbols. Upon
addition of 1 equiv of the Pirkle’s reagent, the signals for
the CH2–Ar–CN protons were doubled and shifted
slightly while aromatic resonances associated with the
calixarene framework were only broadened. The
ArCH2Ar signals were all affected significantly as well.
At 2 equiv of Pirkle’s reagent, additional changes to the
spectrum were observed. Of the three pairs of doublets
for the Ar–H protons of the calixarene rings, two
(square and diamond) showed doubling of only one sig-
nal within a coupled pair and the third (circles) showed
no doubling at all and not much broadening. Based on
the doubling behavior of certain signals, it is tempting
to conclude that Pirkle’s reagent interacts preferentially
with one side of the molecule.
12. Into a round bottom flask was placed 3.34 g (2.78 mmol)
of 2 along with 500 mL of acetone. To this was added
0.95 g (40 mmol) of sodium hydride (Caution!: flammable).
Tri(ethyleneglycol)di-p-tosylate (1.82 g, 3.97 mmol) was
dissolved in 100 mL of acetone and added over 45 min.
The reaction was heated to reflux for 48 h and then the
solvent was removed. The residue was re-dissolved in
CHCl3 and the solution was washed with 2 N HCl. The
organic layer was dried over MgSO4, filtered, and
concentrated to a minimal volume then poured into
CH3OH to precipitate the product. Isolated yields of 26–
33% of 3 as a pure white powder were routinely obtained.
The product was recrystallized from n-octane to obtain
crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction. 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3) d = 7.54 (s, 2H), 7.34, 7.03 (AXq,
J = 2.4 Hz), 7.14, 6.80 (AXq, J = 2.0 Hz, 4H), 7.00, 6.48
(AXq, J = 2.0 Hz, 4H), 6.70, 6.38 (AXq, J = 8.0 Hz, 8H),
4.65, 4.49 (ABq, J = 13.6 Hz, 4H), 4.59, 3.26 (AXq,
J = 17.2 Hz, 4H), 4.19, 3.56 (AMq, J = 17.6 Hz, 4H),
4.16, 4.03 (ABq, J = 16.8 Hz, 4H), 3.87 (t, J = 10 Hz, 2H),
3.51 (t, J = 10 Hz, 2H), 3.33–3.35, (m, 3H), 3.23–3.21 (m,
3H), 2.10 (t, J = 10 Hz, 2H), 1.42 (s, 18H), 1.17 (s, 18H),
0.89 (s, 18H). 13C {1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3)
d = 152.92, 151.38, 150.02, 147.48, 145.84, 143.27,
141.78, 135.53, 133.20, 131.17, 131.08, 129.85, 127.51,
126.44, 125.31, 125.26, 125.16, 124.84, 124.07, 118.89,
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Robert A. Welch Founda-
tion for financial support and Professor Carl Carrano
at San Diego State University for providing the X-ray
structure. The NSF-MRI program Grant CHE-
0320848 is acknowledged for support of the X-ray
diffraction facilities at SDSU.
References and notes
1. Calixarenes 2001; Asfari, Z., Bohmer, V., Harrowfield,
J., Vicens, J., Eds.; Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht,
2001.
2. Bohmer, V.; Kraft, D.; Tabatabai, M. J. Incl. Phenom.
1994, 19, 17–39.
3. Luo, J.; Zheng, Q.-Y.; Chen, C.-F.; Huang, Z.-T. Chem.
Eur. J. 2005, 11, 5917–5928.
4. Li, S.-Y.; Zheng, Q.-Y.; Chen, C.-F.; Huang, Z.-T.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 641–645.