Communication
ChemComm
cages with imine and boronate ester linkages can be obtained
by polycondensation reactions in a ball mill.5b,13 These results
prompted us to explore whether macrocycle 2 could also be
obtained by ball-milling. The reaction was performed using a
MM200 Retsch mill operating at 30 Hz. Ball milling of the
boronic acid, the silane diol and the diamine for 2 ꢁ 45 min
gave a white powder. 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis of this
powder revealed that macrocycle 2 had formed in high yield
(490%; see ESI‡). Washing with dry diethyl ether gave pure 2 in
an isolated yield of 85% (Scheme 2). Macrocycle 3 could be
prepared in a similar fashion. The crude product was less pure
(see ESI‡), but a simple recrystallization gave 3 in 65% yield.
These results are evidence that borasiloxanes are accessible by
ball-milling. Furthermore, they show that the mechanochemical
syntheses of borasiloxane macrocycles can be achieved with high
yields, outperforming more classical solution-based methods.
In summary, we have described the synthesis of large
macrocycles with imine and borasiloxane linkages. The macro-
cycles are obtained in simple multicomponent condensation
reactions of t-Bu2Si(OH)2, 4-formylbenzeneboronic acid, and
diamines. It is conceivable that related reactions with polyfunc-
tional building blocks (e.g. triamines) can be used to generate
borasiloxane-based cages or networks. Our work is also further
evidence for the utility of mechanochemistry in structural
supramolecular chemistry.14
Fig. 1 The structures of macrocycles 2 (left) and 3 (right) as determined by
molecular modeling. Color coding: C: grey; N: blue, O: red; B: green; Si: cyan.
Hydrogen atoms are not shown.
The eight-membered (SiOBO)4 ring of crystalline 1 is nearly flat
with the coplanar 4-formylbenzene rings pointing in opposite
directions. The bond lengths and angles of 1 are similar to
9
what has been observed for (t-Bu2SiO)2(p-BrC6H4BO)2 and
(t-Bu2SiO)2(PhBO)2.10
Subsequently, the dialdehyde 1 was combined with the
diamines 4,40-bis(aminomethyl)biphenyl and (1R,2R)-1,2-diamino-
cyclohexane. The latter diamine was chosen because it has been
used previously with good success for the synthesis of imine
macrocycles (‘trianglimines’).1,11 The diamine with the biphenyl
spacer, on the other hand, was expected to result in an expanded
structure. Condensation of 1 with the diamines in organic
solvents gave macrocycles 2 and 3 in moderate yields (2:33%;
3:50%). The products were characterized by NMR spectroscopy
(1H, 13C, 29Si), elemental analysis, and mass spectrometry (see
ESI‡). Attempts to obtain single crystals for crystallographic
analysis were unfortunately not successful. In order to estimate
the size of 2 and 3, we have performed molecular modeling
using the crystallographic data of 1 for calibration (see ESI‡).
The 81-membered macrocycle 2 displays a diameter (max.
Cꢀ ꢀ ꢀC distance) of approximately 2.4 nm, and the 57-membered
macrocycle 3 of around 1.5 nm (Fig. 1).
This work was supported by a Marie-Curie fellowship (M.P.
IEF-2009-252716), by the Swiss National Science Foundation
and by the EPFL.
Notes and references
1 (a) M. E. Belowich and J. F. Stoddart, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 2003;
(b) N. M. Rue, J. Sun and R. Warmuth, Isr. J. Chem., 2011, 51, 743;
(c) M. Mastalerz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 5042;
(d) N. B. Borisova, M. D. Reshetova and Y. A. Ustynyuk, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2007, 107, 46; (e) P. A. Vigato, S. Tamburini and L. Bertolo,
Coord. Chem. Rev., 2007, 251, 1311; ( f ) M. J. MacLachlan, Pure Appl.
Chem., 2006, 78, 873.
Next, we have examined whether it is possible to obtain
macrocycle 2 in a one-pot reaction from t-Bu2Si(OH)2, 4-formyl-
benzeneboronic acid and 4,40-bis(aminomethyl) biphenyl. This
three-component reaction indeed gave the desired product,
albeit in low isolated yield (20%). The 1H NMR spectrum of
the crude product showed that macrocycle 2 had formed as the
major product, but the recrystallization procedure employed
for purification resulted in significant loss of material.
The mechanochemical synthesis of compounds by grinding
solids in a mortar or – advantageously – in a ball mill is rapidly
gaining popularity.12 We have recently shown that nanometer-sized
2 (a) S.-Y. Ding and W. Wang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, DOI: 10.1039/
c2cs35072f; (b) X. Feng, X. Ding and D. Jiang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012,
41, 6010.
3 (a) E. Moulin, G. Cormos and N. Giuseppone, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012,
41, 1031; (b) P. T. Corbett, J. Leclaire, L. Vial, K. R. West, J.-L. Wietor,
J. K. M. Sanders and S. Otto, Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 3562–3711;
(c) S. J. Rowan, S. J. Cantrill, G. R. L. Cousins, J. K. M. Sanders and
J. F. Stoddart, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 898.
4 (a) R. Nishiyabu, Y. Kubo, T. D. James and J. S. Fossey, Chem.
Commun., 2010, 46, 1124; (b) K. Severin, Dalton Trans., 2009,
5254–5264; (c) N. Fujita, S. Shinkai and T. D. James, Chem.–Asian
¨
J., 2008, 3, 1076; (d) H. Hopfl, Struct. Bonding, 2002, 103, 1.
5 (a) B. Icli, E. Solari, B. Kilbas, R. Scopelliti and K. Severin, Chem.–Eur.
¨
J., 2012, 18, 14867–14874; (b) B. Icli, N. Christinat, J. Tonnemann,
C. Schu¨ttler, R. Scopelliti and K. Severin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009,
131, 3154; (c) N. Christinat, R. Scopelliti and K. Severin, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 1848; (d) M. Hutin, G. Bernardinelli and
J. R. Nitschke, Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 4585; (e) N. Christinat,
R. Scopelliti and K. Severin, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 2192.
6 (a) A. G. Avent, S. E. Lawrence, M. M. Meehan, T. G. Russell and
T. R. Spalding, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun., 2002, 67, 1051;
(b) M. A. Beckett, D. E. Hibbs, M. B. Hursthouse, K. M. A. Malik,
P. Owen and K. S. Varma, J. Organomet. Chem., 2000, 595, 241;
(c) B. J. Brisdon, M. F. Mahon, K. C. Molloy and P. J. Schofield,
J. Organomet. Chem., 1992, 436, 11.
7 (a) W. Liu, M. Pink and D. Lee, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 8703;
(b) H. S. J. Behbehani, B. J. Brisdon and B. McEnaney, Polym. Adv.
Technol., 1994, 5, 653.
Scheme 2 Synthesis of macrocycles 2 and 3 by mechanochemistry.
46 Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 45--47
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013