Page 5 of 6
Medicinal Chemistry Communications
DOI: 10.1039/C4MD00469H
60 7. P. Siripong, B. Konckathip, K. Preechanukool, P. Picha, K.
Tunsuwan, W.C. Taylor, J. Sci. Soc. Thai., 1992, 18, 187–194.
8. A. Kapil, I. B. Koul, S.K. Banerjee, B.D. Gupta, Biochem.
Pharmacol., 1993, 46, 182–185.
and cell cycle progression, being thus an attractive biological
target for drug development.33-35 Auffinger and co-workers
showed that halogenated ligands bind to the cyclin-dependent
kinase 2 (CDK2), leading to more stable complexes than non-
halogenated ligands.36 The incorporation of halogen atoms into
new bioactive chemical entity is commonly used to increase
membrane permeability and thereby improve oral absorption.37
Halogenation also enhances the blood brain barrier (BBB)
permeability and this is a pre-requisite for many drugs.38 In this
9. R.J. Srinivasa, J. Stanslas, N.H. Lajis, S. Said, A.S. Hamzah, A.
5
65
70
75
McCarroll, C. Matthews, M. F. G. Stevens, Brit. J. Cancer, 2003,
88, S25–S54.
10. S. Rajagopal, R. A. Kumar, D. S. Deevi, C. Satyanarayana, R.
Rajagopalan, J. Exp. Ther. Oncol., 2003, 3, 147-158.
11. C.-G. Jiang, J.-B. Li, F.-R. Liu, T. Wu, M. Yu, H.-M. Xu,
Anticancer Res., 2007, 27, 2439-2447.
10 respect our study of new halogenated anticancer agents are
important findings and adds a new approach in cancer research. It
is believed that carbon-halogen bonds are not easily metabolized
by the cytochrome p450 system and, therefore, it is a feasible
strategy to block the metabolically labile positions of a particular
15 new bioactive chemical entity,39 providing an explanation for our
results.
12. M. Geethangili, Y. K. Rao, S.- H. Fang, Y.-M. Tzeng, Phytother.
Res., 2008, 22, 1336-1341.
13. (a) L. Yang, D. Wu, K. Luo, S. Wu, P. Wu, Cancer Lett., 2009, 276,
180-188. (b) J. Li, H.-Y. Cheung, Z. Zhang, G. K. L. Chan, W.-F.
Fong, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 2007, 568, 31-44.
14. S. Nanduri, V. K. Nyavanandi, S. S. R. Thunuguntla, S. Kasu, M. K.
Pallerla, P. S. Ram, S. Rajagopal, R. A. Kumar, R. Ramanujam, J.
M. Babu, K. Vyas, A. S. Devi, G. O. Reddy, V. Akella, Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett,. 2004, 14, 4711-4717.
Conclusion
80 15. S. R. Jada, C. Matthews, M. S. Saad, A. S. Hamzah, N. H. Lajis, M.
F. G. Stevens, J. Stanslas, Br. J. Pharmacol., 2008, 155, 641-654.
16. S. R. Jada, G. S. Subur, C. Matthews, A. S. Hamzah, N. H. Lajis, M.
S. Saad, M. F. G. Stevens, J. Stanslas, Phytochemistry, 2007, 68,
904-912.
In conclusion, our study demonstrates that five andrographolide
derivatives show more potent anticancer activity than
20 andrographolide itself. In this respect, our findings are important
to explore anticancer agent(s). Probably, biological potency of the
derivatives results from the combined effect of the nature of
halogens and the structures of the compounds to which they are
attached. In addition, we can conclude that the potent compound
25 8, which is structurally different from other analogues to some
extent, may be similar to andrographolide in its effect towards
apoptosis induction in cancer cells.
85 17. C. Satyanarayana, D. S. Deevi, R. Rajagopalan, N. Srinivas, S.
Rajagopal, BMC Cancer, 2004, 4, 26. 1-8.
18. H.- W. Xu, J. Zhang, H.-M. Liu, J.-F. Wang, Synth. Commun. 2006,
36, 407-414.
19. A. Hazra, P. Paira, K. B. Sahu, S. Naskar, P. Saha, R. Paira, S.
90
Mondal, A. Maity, P. Luger, M. Weber, N. B. Mondal, S. Banerjee,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2010, 51, 1585−1588.
20. S. K. Dey, D. Bose, A. Hazra, S. Naskar, A. Nandy, R. N. Munda,
S. Das, N. Chatterjee, N. B. Mondal, S. Banerjee, K. Das Saha,
PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(3), e58055.
Acknowledgement
30 The authors express their gratitude to the Director, IICB for
laboratory facilities, and the Indian Council for Medical Research
(ICMR-59/03/2007/BMS/TRM) and WB-DST for providing the
funding and fellowship to DC. NBM is indebted to CSIR for the
award of Emeritus Scientist scheme. We express our gratitude to
35 Dr. Sukdeb Banerjee and Dr. B. Achari (Ex. Emeritus Scientist,
CSIR) for their valuable suggestions. CKJ was supported by
UGC-senior research fellowship.
95 21. A. Hazra, Y. P. Bharitkar, D. Chakraborty, K S. Mondal, N. Singal,
S. Mondal, A. Maity, R. Paira, S. Banerjee, N. B. Mondal ACS
Comb. Sci. 2013, 15, 41−48.
22. G. Makin, J. A. Hickman, Cell. Tissue. Res., 2000, 301(1), 143–152.
23. H. Jyonouchi, S. Sun, K. Iijima, M. Wang, S. S. Hecht,
100
Carcinogenesis, 1999, 20(1), 139–145.
24. M. K. N. Gorter, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas., 1911, 30, 151-160.
25. A. B. Smith, B. H. Toder, P. J. Carrol, J. Donohue, Crystallogr.
Spectr. Res., 1982, 12, 309-319.
Conflict of interest
26. M. Rajani, N. Shrivastava, M. N. Ravishankara, Pharm. Biol.,
2000, 38(3), 204-209.
40 None
105
27. N. Jr. Hail, P. Chen, L. R. Bushman, Neoplasia, 2010, 12, 464–475.
28. A. J. Lambert, M. D. Brand, Biochem. J., 2004, 382, 511–517.
29. T. M. Paravicini, C. G. Sobey, Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol.,
2003, 30 (11), 855–859.
Notes and Reference
aDepartment of Chemistry, bMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, cCancer
Biology and Infllamatory Disorder Division, Indian Institute of Chemical
45 Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, 4 Raja S C
Mullick Road, Jadavpur, Kolkata 700032, West Bengal, India.
dDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Division of Medicinal and
Pharmaceutical Chemistry, PO Box No. 17020, Jadavpur University,
Kolkata-700 032, West Bengal, India.
110 30. L. Gibellini, M. Pinti, M. Nasi, S. D. Biasi, E. Roat, Cancers, 2010,
2, 1288–1311.
31. M. Leist, M. Jaattela, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 2001, 2, 589–598.
32. G. Siegal, E. Ab, J. Schultz, Drug Discovery Today, 2007, 12,
1032–1039.
50 † Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: [details of any
supplementary information available should be included here]. See
DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/
115 33. W. F. Jr. De Azevedo, S. Leclerc, L. Meijer, L. Havlicek, M. Strnad,
Eur. J. Biochem. 1997, 243, 518–526.
1. Traditional medicine strategy launched. WHO News, 2002, 80, 610.
34. W. F. Jr. De Azevedo, F. Canduri, N. J. da Silveira, Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 293, 566–571.
2. S. Benowitz, Scientist 1996, 10, 1−7.
55 3. D. J. Newman, G. M. Cragg, J. Nat. Prod., 2007, 70, 461−477.
35. W. F. Jr. De Azevedo, R. T. Gaspar, F. Canduri, J. C. Jr. Camera, N.
120
J. F. Silveira, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2002, 297, 1154–
1158.
centre/iarcnews/2010/globocan2008.php.
36. P. Auffinger, F. A. Hays, E. Westhof, P. S. Ho, Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci., USA 2004, 101, 16789–16794.
6. S.S. Handa, A. Sharma, Indian J. Med. Res., 1990, 92, 284–292.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry [year]
Journal Name, [year], [vol], 00–00 | 5