Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Paper
H]−, calcd for C15H19FO6S 346.09. HPLC (system A): tR
=
CH3), 30.5 (d, J 20.4, –CH2–CH2–F), 34.7, 39.5, 44.1, 44.5, 50.9
23.2 min (purity 94%); λmax (recorded during the HPLC analy- (1 × C(CH3)2), 51.1 (1 × C(CH3)2), 62.8 (1 × CH(SO3H)), 77.4
sis) 254 nm. Too hygroscopic compound for suitable elemental (masked by CHCl3), 82.4 (d, J 164.6, CH2F), 103.6, 104.7, 110.7,
analysis.
122.1, 125.0, 125.2, 126.8, 127.8, 128.3, 129.3, 130.3, 130.8,
MONO-FLUORO-SULFONATED BENZOIC ACID (4). To a stirred solution 130.9, 131.9, 132.0, 133.6, 134.0, 138.0, 139.4, 139.5, 139.6,
of tert-butyl ester 3 (13.5 mg, 0.04 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1 mL) was 151.3, 152.2, 167.5, 173.6 (1 × CONHR), 174.2 (2 × CH), 179.8
added a solution of TFA in CH2Cl2 (1 mL, 1 : 1, v/v). The result- (1
× Cq, CONH2), 195.0 (1 × Cq, CO-aryl ketone); δF
ing reaction mixture was vigorously stirred at rt for 1 h. Com- (282.5 MHz, CDCl3) −75.5 (s, CF3-TFA, 3F), −218.3 (m, –CH2F,
pletion of the reaction was checked by analytical RP-HPLC 1F); MS (ESI+): m/z 911.20 [M + H]+, 1011.93 [M + TEA + H]+,
(system A). Then, the reaction mixture was evaporated under MS (ESI−): m/z 909.33 [M − H]−, 1023.13 [M + TFA − H]−,
reduced pressure and co-evaporated thrice with toluene (3 × 1933.87 [2 M + TFA − H]−, calcd for C54H59FN4O6S 910.41;
20 mL) to give the desired product 4 as a white solid (11.2 mg, HRMS (ESI+): m/z 911.4215 [M + H]+, calcd for C54H60FN4O6S+
quantitative yield). δH (300 MHz, CD3OD) 8.14 (m, 4H), 5.12 911.4217; HPLC (system B): tR = 26.0 min, purity > 99%; HPLC
(dd, J 4.2, 9.4, –CH(SO3H), 1H), 4.70–4.29 (m, –CH2F, 2H), (system I): tR = 23.7 min; λmax (DMSO) nm 689 (ε/dm3 mol−1
2.77–2.43 (m, –CH2–CH2F, 2H); δC (75.5 MHz, CD3OD) 39.5 (d, cm−1 195 000), λmax em (DMSO) nm 714 (ΦF 0.42); λmax (PBS +
J 30.2, –CH2–CH2–F), 72.0 (d, J 6.0, –CH(SO3H)), 92.0 (d, J 5% BSA) nm 697 (ε/dm3 mol−1 cm−1 162 000), λmax em (PBS +
242.1, 1 × –CH2–F), 138.5 (2 × CH–Ph), 138.6 (2 × CH–Ph), 5% BSA) nm 712 (ΦF 0.38).
143.3 (1 × Cq–Ph), 150.6 (1 × Cq–Ph), 176.3 (1 × Cq, CO2H),
FLUORO-MONOSULFONATED
DODECAPEPTIDE
“COLD”
REFERENCE
204.4 (1 × Cq, CO-aryl ketone); δF (282.5 MHz, CD3OD) −220.7 (8). Dodecapeptide (its sequence is confidential and not dis-
(tt, J 24.5, 48.0, –CH2F, 1F); MS (ESI−): m/z 289.00 [M − H]−, closed within this article but it contains a single reactive lysine
calcd for C11H11FO6S 290.03; HRMS (ESI−): m/z 289.0182 [M − residue, 2.5 mg, 1.3 μmol, 1 equiv.) was dissolved in H2O–
H]−, calcd for C11H10FO6S− 289.0182; HPLC (system A): tR
=
CH3CN (1 : 1, v/v, 500 μL) and 2.6 μL of a 2.0 M solution of
13.5 min (purity 95%); λmax (recorded during the HPLC analy- DIEA in NMP (5.2 μmol, 4 equiv.) was added. 15 μL of a 90 mM
sis) 254 nm. Too hygroscopic compound for suitable elemental solution of NHS ester 1 in NMP was added and the resulting
analysis.
reaction mixture was stirred at rt overnight. The reaction was
(48 mg, checked for completion by RP-HPLC (system G). Thereafter,
[19F]-PROSTHETIC GROUP (1). Benzoic acid
4
0.165 mmol) was dissolved in peptide synthesis-grade NMP the reaction mixture was diluted with aq. TFA 0.1% and puri-
(1.5 mL). TSTU (49.8 mg, 0.165 mmol, 1 equiv.) and DIEA fied by semi-preparative RP-HPLC (system H, 1 injection). The
(165 μL of a 2.0 M solution in NMP, 0.33 mmol, 2 equiv.) were product-containing fractions were lyophilised to give the TFA
sequentially added and the resulting reaction mixture was salt of fluoro-monosulfonated dodecapeptide 8. MS (ESI+): m/z
stirred at rt for 30 min. The reaction was checked for com- 873.13 [M + 2H]2+, 1754.80 [M + H]+, MS (ESI−): m/z 1742.80
pletion by ESI mass spectrometry. The crude NHS ester was [M − H]−, 1856.13 [M + TFA − H]−, 1970.67 [M + 2TFA − H]−,
used in the next amidification reactions without prior purifi- calcd for C76H122FN23O21S 1743.89; HRMS (ESI+): m/z 872.9517
cation–isolation. MS (ESI−): m/z 386.00 [M − H]−, calcd for [M + 2H]2+, calcd for (C76H124FN23O21S2+)/2 872.9523; HPLC
C15H14FNO8S 387.04.
(system A): tR = 21.3 min, purity 96% (two diastereomers);
FLUORO-MONOSULFONATED CYANINE “COLD” REFERENCE (7). Cyanine HPLC (system I): tR = 15.2 min; λmax (recorded during the
amino-amide 6 (19.25 mg, 30.1 μmol) was dissolved in NMP HPLC analysis) 261 nm.
(1 mL) and DIEA (180 μL of a 2.0 M solution in NMP,
Radiosyntheses
PROSTHETIC GROUP ([18F]-1). We performed the multistep syn-
360 μmol, 12 equiv.). 500 μL of a 90 mM solution of NHS ester
1 in NMP was added and the resulting reaction mixture was
stirred at rt overnight. The reaction was checked for com- thesis of this novel prosthetic group on an automated synthesi-
pletion by RP-HPLC (system B). Thereafter, the reaction zer TRACERlab MX equipped with standard FDG cassettes
mixture was diluted with aq. TEAB and purified by semi-pre- which were modified according to our needs. A new Excel®
parative RP-HPLC (system E, 1 injection, tR = 42.0–46.0 min). sequence, defining every step of the synthetic procedure, was
The product-containing fractions were lyophilised and also developed to control the module via a computer. The FDG
desalted by semi-preparative RP-HPLC (system F) to give the cassette is composed of three manifolds where solvents and
TFA salt of fluoro-monosulfonated cyanine 7 (12 mg, 13 μmol, reagents are charged: first manifold (positions 1 to 5), second
yield 43%). δH (300 MHz, CDCl3) 8.29 (bt, J 5.0, 1H, NH), manifold (positions 6 to 10) and third manifold (positions 11
8.15–7.30 (m, NH, Ph-benzamide, Ph-benzoindole and 2 × to 15). The C18 and alumina cartridges were removed and the
CHvCH–CHvC, 17H), 7.01 (t, J 12.5, CHvCH–CHvC, 1H), water bag (250 mL) was transferred from positions 7 to 13. A
6.66 (d, J 13.8, CHvCH–CHvC, 1H), 6.33 (d, J 13.5, CHvCH– vial of CH3CN (7 mL) and one containing a solution of TSTU
CHvC, 1H), 5.18 (m, CH(SO3H), 1H), 4.64–4.07 (m, CH2F and in CH3CN were respectively placed in positions 3 and 5. All the
2 × N(benzoindole)–CH2, 6H), 3.52 (bm, CH2–NH–C(O), 2H), reactions took place in a single reactor which was cleaned with
2.85–2.60 (m, –CH2–CH2F, 2H), 2.32 (bt, J 7.0, CH2–CONH2, HCl and deionised water between purification and generation
2H), 1.96 (s, 4 × CH3(benzoindole), 12H) 1.90–1.44 (m, 5 × of the active ester. Appropriate detectors permit us to follow
–CH2–, 10H); δC (75.5 MHz, CDCl3) 25.0, 26.1, 27.4, 27.8 (4 × the radioactivity during the synthesis, on the QMA and HLB
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 469–479 | 477