Paper
Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
is achieved from native RNase A (12). Azido–(K1)RNase A (13)
contains a single azido group as shown by the MALDI-ToF-MS
Acknowledgements
spectrum and the modification site is located at K1 as demon- We acknowledge funding from the German Research Foun-
strated by nanoLC-MS2 analysis which is consistent with pre- dation (DFG) via the SFB 625 as well as grant P3246029 and
vious biotinylation results.34 K1 site-selectivity has been the Volkswagenstifung (Aktenzeichen 86 366) for their finan-
further verified from the XIC chromatographs of both modi- cial support of this work.
fied and unmodified KETAAAKF (1–8) peptide fragments
suggesting that all detected K1 fragments have been modified.
In order to assess the reactivity of the introduced azido group,
the water soluble azide-reactive chromophore, rho–TEO–phos-
phine (21), has been prepared facilitating the successful label-
Notes and references
ing of azido–(K1)RNase A (13) yielding a fluorescent rho–(K1)
RNase A (22) variant.
1 T. L. Foley and M. D. Burkart, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2007,
11, 12–19.
The work described herein represents an extension of our
previous attempt to introduce a bioorthogonal ethynyl group
for click labeling via the KPL approach.34 The present study
aims at introducing the more attractive bioorthogonal azido
group to further broaden the general applicability of KPL. The
azido group has proven to be an ideal bioorthogonal anchor
since aside from the copper(I)-catalyzed click reaction that
both azido and ethynyl can participate in,20 azido groups also
allow other attractive posttranslational modifications such as
copper-free click reactions38 or Staudinger ligations that
proceed under mild physiological conditions which can be
performed even in living animals. The introduction of the
azido group by this new bioconjugation reagent, biotin–TEO–
azido–NHS (11), has been accomplished following an opti-
mized procedure which allowed increasing the labeling
efficacy.
2 M. B. Francis and I. S. Carrico, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.,
2010, 14, 771–773.
3 L. Yi, H. Sun, A. Itzen, G. Triola, H. Waldmann, R. S. Goody
and Y. W. Wu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 2011, 50, 8287.
4 M. Hejjaoui, S. Butterfield, B. Fauvet, F. Vercruysse, J. Cui,
I. Dikiy, M. Prudent, D. Olschewski, Y. Zhang, D. Eliezer
and H. A. Lashuel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 5192.
5 E. Basle, N. Joubert and M. Pucheault, Chem. Biol., 2010,
17, 213–227.
6 H. B. Moeller, J. Praetorius, M. R. Rutzler and R. A. Fenton,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2010, 107, 424–429.
7 X. Michalet, S. Weiss and M. Jager, Chem. Rev., 2006, 106,
1785–1813.
8 J. Y. Yang and W. Y. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131,
11644–11645.
9 J. M. Harris and R. B. Chess, Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery, 2003,
2, 214–221.
Modified azido-proteins represent attractive macromolecu-
lar building blocks that offer the great opportunity to attach 10 S. J. Bell, C. M. Fam, E. A. Chlipala, S. J. Carlson, J. I. Lee,
a variety of functional groups e.g. via Staudinger ligation.
This opens up exciting prospects for achieving protein
M. S. Rosendahl, D. H. Doherty and G. N. Cox, Bioconjugate
Chem., 2008, 19, 299–305.
libraries in a straightforward fashion to allow a deeper inves- 11 G. Walsh, Drug Discovery Today, 2010, 15, 773–780.
tigation of the impact of unnatural substituents such as 12 S. D. Tilley and M. B. Francis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128,
polymer chains, lipids or peptides on cell uptake, cell
1080–1081.
trafficking and cytotoxicity. Such investigations could have a 13 Y. Kim, S. O. Ho, N. R. Gassman, Y. Korlann, E. V. Landorf,
high impact on the rational design of improved protein or
protein–polymer therapeutics. In this context, it would be
F. R. Collart and S. Weiss, Bioconjugate Chem., 2008, 19,
786–791.
attractive to further improve the therapeutic potential of 14 A. J. Link, M. L. Mock and D. A. Tirrell, Curr. Opin. Biotech-
clinically relevant RNase A variants by introducing the appro- nol., 2003, 14, 603–609.
priate post-modifications by high content protein synthesis. 15 K. L. Kiick, E. Saxon, D. A. Tirrell and C. R. Bertozzi, Proc.
The novel bioorthogonal linker presented herein could be Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2002, 99, 19–24.
applied in principle for the site-selective introduction of an 16 L. Wang, A. Brock, B. Herberich and P. G. Schultz, Science,
azido group onto other proteins and peptides as well and we 2001, 292, 498–500.
have already demonstrated the modification of the protein 17 H. S. Park, M. J. Hohn, T. Umehara, L. T. Guo,
lysozyme and the peptide hormone somatostatin following
this strategy. These findings underline that the KPL
E. M. Osborne, J. Benner, C. J. Noren, J. Rinehart and
D. Soll, Science, 2011, 333, 1151–1154.
approach is not only applicable if the protein of interest 18 A. Dondoni, Angew. Chem. Int., Ed. Engl., 2008, 47,
carries a lysine residue at the N-terminus since the most 8995–8997.
accessible lysine residue will be modified. In addition, the 19 J. E. Moses and A. D. Moorhouse, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007, 36,
KPL approach could probably be extended to recombinant 1249–1262.
proteins where an accessible lysine residue is introduced via 20 H. C. Kolb, M. G. Finn and K. B. Sharpless, Angew. Chem.,
a point mutation. In this way, it might be also suitable for Int. Ed. Engl., 2001, 40, 2004–2021.
dual labeling strategies in combination with cysteine point 21 H. Pfeiffer, A. Rojas, J. Niesel and U. Schatzschneider,
mutations.
Dalton Trans., 2009, 4292–4298.
360 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 353–361
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013