introduction of allyl and benzyl groups on indoles. For
N-alloc indole, for example, treatment with a palladium
catalyst was expected to produce π-allyl palladium and an
indole carboxylate (A), which upon CO2 loss would gen-
erate indoyl-π-allyl palladium (B), the penultimate inter-
mediate in our earlier reported method (Scheme 2).6c We
substituted indoles, including tetrahydrocarbazoles and
β-and γ-tetrahydrocarbolines (Table 1).
Alloc derivatives of indole and tetrahydrocarbazole
were successfully converted to the desired allylated pro-
ducts in high yields under low catalyst loadings (2aÀb).
Electron-donating and -withdrawing groups at the C5
position were tolerated (2cÀd). Both β- and γ-tetrahydro-
carbolines were successfully converted to the allylated
products (2eÀh), albeit under slightly higher catalyst load-
ings (2À5%). For reasons that are unclear, the Boc-
protected carboline, 1f, consistently gave lower yields than
did other carbolines. The alloc derivatives of indole and
2-methyl indole produced a mixture of the respective
mono- and bis-allylated compounds (2iÀ2l). Formation
of the bis-allylated products is noteworthy: it demonstrates
that the decarboxylative allylation does not involve an
intramolecular transfer of the allyl group.12 Finally, more
substituted allylic groups can be incorporated by starting
with the corresponding indole precursor. Thus, the croty-
lated indolesubstrate affordedthe crotylated product (2m)
in 84% yield, completely as the trans-diastereomer.
Scheme 1. Decarboxylative Allylation of Indole
In order to further expand the scope of the allylation
reaction to give the cinnamylated product, we considered
additional pathways to these compounds. One option was
to start with a cinnamyl carbamate precursor (1n), analo-
gous to the crotyl precursor (1m). Indeed, decarboxylative
rearrangement of 1n under the standard conditions gave
the expected cinnamyl product in 80% yield (Scheme 3, I).
However, as the preparation of the required starting
material for the cinnamyl product was neither as trivial
nor asefficient as for the alloc-protected indole derivatives,
we envisioned a tandem sequence in which a decarboxylative
Scheme 2. Catalytic Cycle for Decarboxylative Allylation
(6) (a) Kimura, M.; Futamata, M.; Mukai, R.; Tamaru, Y. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4592–4593. (b) Trost, B. M.; Quancard, J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6314–6315. (c) Kagawa, N.; Malerich, J. P.;
Rawal, V. H. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2381–2384. (d) Xu, Q.-L; Dai, L.-X.;
You, S.-L. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 97–102.
(7) Alylation using other transition metals; see, inter alia: (a) Dieter,
J. W.; Li, Z.; Nicholas, K. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 5415–5418. (b)
Prajapati, D.; Gohain, M.; Gogoi, B. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47,
3535–3539. (c) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Aravind, S.; Kumar, G. G.
K. S. N.; Reddy, A. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 6117–6120. (d)
Zaitsev, A. B.; Gruber, S.; Pregosin, P. S. Chem. Commun. 2007,
4692–4693. (e) Liu, W.-B.; He, H.; Dai, L.-X.; You, S.-L. Org. Lett.
2008, 10, 1815–1818. (f) Sundararaju, B.; Achard, M.; Demerseman, B.;
Bruneau, C.; Toupet, L.; Sharma, G. V. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010,
49, 2782–2785.
(8) For the C3-benzylation of indoles, see: Zhu, Y.; Rawal, V. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 111–114.
describe below the realization of this concept of palla-
dium-catalyzed decarboxylative allylation and benzyla-
tion of indoles.
(9) N-alloc and N-Cbz indoles can be easily accessed by several
methods: (a) Shingarova, I. D.; Sizova, O. S.; Preobrazhenskaya,
M. N. Chem. Hetercycl. Compd. (N.Y.) 1983, 19, 1188–1191. (b)
Weedon, A. C.; Zhang, B. Synthesis 1992, 95–100. (c) Macor, J. E.;
Cuff, A.; Cornelius, L. Terahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2733–2736. (d)
We began these studies by examining a range of con-
ditions for the decarboxylative allylation of N-alloc 2,3-
dimethylindole (1a).10 Among the palladium sources eval-
uated, Pd2(dba)3•CHCl3 was found to give the best yield.
An investigation of mono- and bidentate ligands revealed
that electron-deficient monodentate phosphines gave
superior results, with trifuryl phosphine11 affording the
highest yields. Optimal conditions involved the use of a 1:1
molar ratio of phosphine to palladium. The reaction
conditions determined by this study proved to be applic-
able to a variety of alloc-protected derivatives of
ꢀ ꢀ
ꢀ
Jacquemard, U.; Beneteau, V.; Lefoix, M.; Routier, S.; Merour, J.-Y.;
Coudert, G. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 10039–10047.
(10) Please see Supporting Information for a table of some of the
conditions examined.
(11) Andersen, N. G.; Keay, B. A. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 997–1030.
(12) In support of this suggestion, we have found that subjection of a
1:1 mixture of 1b and 6-methoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrocarbazole to the
standard decarboxylative allylation conditions produced a 1:1.5 mixture
of 2b:2d.
(13) (a) Mizoroki, T.; Mori, K.; Ozaki, A. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1971,
44, 581. (b) Heck, R. F.; Nolley, J. P., Jr. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 2320–
2322. For selected reviews, see: (a) de Meijere, A.; Meyer, F. E. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 33, 2379–2411. (b) Beletskaya, I. P.;
Cheprakov, A. V. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 3009–3066.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX