Organometallics
Article
64, 5815−5849. (n) Shen, H. C. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 7847−7870.
(o) Widenhoefer, R. A. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 5382−5391. (p) Gorin,
equally quickly with both Pic and Lut. Therefore, if the reaction of D5
with Pic and Lut followed this stepwise dissociative pathway, it would
have a closely comparable reaction rate.
(14) (a) Brown, T. J.; Dickens, M. G.; Widenhoefer, R. A. Chem.
Commun. 2009, 6451−6453. (b) Brown, T. J.; Dickens, M. G.;
Widenhoefer, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6350−6351. (c) Zhu,
Y.; Day, C. S.; Jones, A. C. Organometallics 2012, 31, 7332−7335.
D. J.; Toste, F. D. Nature 2007, 446, 395−403. (q) Furstner, A.;
̈
Davies, P. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3410−3449.
́
́
(r) Jimenez-Nunez, E.; Echavarren, A. M. Chem. Commun. 2007,
̃
333−346. (s) Hashmi, A. S. K. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 3180−3211.
(t) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Hutchings, G. J. Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 8064−
8105; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7896−7936.
(2) Important reviews about catalytic intermediates in gold catalysis:
(a) Hashmi, A. S. K. Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 5360−5369; Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5232−5241. (b) Liu, L.-P.; Hammond, G. B.
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3129−3139.
́
(3) (a) Weber, D.; Tarselli, M. A.; Gagne, M. R. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2009, 48, 5733−5736. (b) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Braun, I.; Nosel, P.;
̈
Schadlich, J.; Wieteck, M.; Rudolph, M.; Rominger, F. Angew. Chem.,
̈
Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 4456−4460. (c) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Braun, I.;
Rudolph, M.; Rominger, F. Organometallics 2012, 31, 644−661.
(d) Chen, Y.; Chen, M.; Liu, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6181−
6186. (e) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Wieteck, M.; Braun, I.; Nosel, P.;
̈
Jongbloed, L.; Rudolph, M.; Rominger, F. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354,
555−562. (f) Brown, T. J.; Weber, D.; Gagne,
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 9134−9137. (g) Weber, D.; Jones, T.
D.; Adduci, L. L.; Gagne, M. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 2452−
́
M. R.; Widenhoefer, R.
́
2456. (h) Heckler, J. E.; Zeller, M.; Hunter, A. D.; Gray, T. G. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5924−5928. (i) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Wieteck,
M.; Braun, I.; Rudolph, M.; Rominger, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012,
51, 10633−10637. (j) Hansmann, M. M.; Rudolph, M.; Rominger, F.;
Hashmi, A. S. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2593−2598. (k) For
́ ́
a recent highlight about gem-diaurated species, see: Gomez-Suarez, A.;
Nolan, S. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8156−8159.
(4) Zhdanko, A.; Maier, M. E. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, DOI: 10.1002/
chem.201204491.
(5) Seidel, G.; Lehmann, C. W.; Furstner, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
̈
2010, 49, 8466−8470. See also ref 3f.
(6) Zhdanko, A.; Strobele, M.; Maier, M. E. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18,
̈
14732−14744.
(7) The corresponding equilibrium constant for the CN-containing
species could not be determined, because the species already
decomposed upon addition of K2CO3 during preparation of the
reaction mixture for determination of the equilibrium constant (see
the Supporting Information). This fact points to the high instability of
the species.
(8) Complexes L2AuNu+ bearing a weak ligand (e.g., MeCN) are
known to react with PrSp and H2O to displace the Nu: 2 L2AuNu+ +
PrSp + H2O → (L2Au)2OH+ + PrSpH+ + Nu.6 Nu should be weaker
than Me2S for this reaction to occur.
(9) The superiority of catalyst 2 over 1 can be seen in the following
examples: (a) Nieto-Oberhuber, C.; Lop
Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6178−6179. (b) Nieto-Oberhuber, C.;
Munoz, M. P.; Lopez, S.; Jimenez-Nunez, E.; Nevado, C.; Herrero-
ez, E.; Raducan, M.; Echavarren, A. M. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12,
1677−1693; 2008, 14, 5096 (corrigendum). (c) Aponick, A.; Li, C.-Y.;
Palmes, J. A. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 121−124. (d) Barabe, F.; Betournay,
́
ez, S.; Echavarren, A. M. J.
́
́
́
̃
̃
Gom
́
́
́
G.; Bellavance, G.; Barriault, L. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4236−4238.
(10) Nesmeyanov, A. N.; Perevalova, E. G.; Grandberg, K. I.;
Lemenovskii, D. A.; Baukova, T. V.; Afanassova, O. B. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1974, 65, 131−144.
(11) The same fast exchange was previously observed in
3g
+
Ar(AuPPh3)2 /ArAuPPh3 systems.
(12) The prognosis for the equilibrium is described in the Supporting
Information.
(13) Assume a fast dissociation preequilibrium with the subsequent
reaction with a nucleophile:
Nu
+
R(AuL)2 ⇌ RAuL + LAu+ ⎯⎯→ LAuNu
The difference in reactivity of Pic and Lut with LAu+ unit is not so
high as to cause such a dramatic difference in the reactivity of D5. The
equilibrium constant for the exchange L2AuLut+/Pic is 1.7 and is
established immediately,6 indicating that any LAu+ would react almost
2006
dx.doi.org/10.1021/om400083f | Organometallics 2013, 32, 2000−2006