ORGANIC
LETTERS
XXXX
Vol. XX, No. XX
000–000
Versatile Approaches for the Synthesis
of Fused-Ring γ‑Lactones Utilizing
Cyclopropane Intermediates
Timothy R. Newhouse, Philip S. J. Kaib, Andrew W. Gross, and E. J. Corey*
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge,
Massachusetts 02138, United States
Received February 7, 2013
ABSTRACT
A highly effective acid-catalyzed cyclopropyl ester to γ-lactone skeletal rearrangement has been demonstrated and applied to the synthesis of a
variety of bi- and tricyclic functionalized lactones, rigid and highly compact structures for use as biological probes.
γ-Lactones have served as versatile intermediates in
countless syntheses of complex molecules, and as a con-
sequence, many studies have been directed at increasing
synthetic access to this structural subunit. As a result,
there is now a large repetoire of methods for γ-lactone
synthesis.1,2 The most generally useful processes are those
which allow stereocontrol by internal delivery or catalytic
entantioselective access to complex chiral structures.
Such processes include the following: (1) intramolecular
DielsꢀAlder reactions of acrylate esters,3 (2) intramolecu-
lar addition of diazo esters to carbonꢀcarbon double
bonds,4 (3) addition of acrylate esters to ketonic carbonyls
induced by SmI2,5 (4) intramolecular or intermolecular
cycloaddition of ketenes to carbonꢀcarbon double bonds
followed by BaeyerꢀVilliger oxidation,6 (5) intramolecular
or intermolecular cycloaddition of β-keto acids to carbonꢀ
carbon double bonds induced by Mn3O(OAc)7,7 (6) in-
tramolecular halo- and hydroxylactonization,8 and (7)
intramolecular addition of radicals to carbonꢀcarbon
double bonds.9
This paper reports new and short routes to a variety of
chiral γ-lactones using tactical combinations of a cyclo-
propyl ester to γ-lactone skeletal rearrangement10 and a
range of enantioselective processes.
We provide as the first illustration of our approach the
enantioselective synthesis of the tricyclic keto-lactone (1)
shown in Scheme 1. The starting point was the R-ester 3,
which was prepared enantioselectively as previously de-
scribed, using the chiral oxazaborolidinium ion 2 as cata-
lyst.11 The β-ketoester 4 was accessed from 3 by Claisen
condensation and then transformed into the correspond-
ing R-diazoketone using tosyl azide and triethylamine.
(1) Corey, E. J.; Cheng, X.-M. The Logic of Chemical Synthesis; John
Wiley: New York, 1988.
(2) (a) Smith, M. B.; March, J. March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry:
Mechanisms, Reactions, and Structure, 5th ed.; John Wiley: New York,
2001. (b) Ogliaruso, M. A.; Waefe, J. F. Synthesis of Lactones and Lactams:
John Wiley: New York, 2010; online.
(3) For an early example with a δ-lactone, see: Corey, E. J.; Danheiser,
R. L.; Chandrasekaran, S.; Siret, P.; Gras, J.-L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978,
100, 8031–8034.
(7) (a) Heiba, E. I.; Dessau, R. M.; Koehl, W. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1968, 90, 5905–5906. (b) Corey, E. J.; Kang, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1984, 106, 5384–5385.
(8) (a) Ma, S.; Chen, G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8306–8308.
(b) Wang, Z.-M.; Zhang, X.-L.; Sharpless, K. B.; Sinha, S. C.;
Sinha-Bagchi, A.; Keinan, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6407–6410.
(9) Singh, A. K.; Bakshi, R. K.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987,
109, 6187–6189.
(10) This work was initiated by A.W.G. at Harvard in 1982 and
completed recently by T.R.N. and P.S.J.K. For a related example, see:
Kolsaker, P.; Jensen, A. K. Acta Chem. Scand. 1988, B 42, 345–353.
(11) Ryu, D. H.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6388–
6390.
(4) Doyle, M. P.; Pieters, R. J.; Martin, S. F.; Austin, R. E.; Oalmann,
€
C. J.; Muller, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 1423–1424.
(5) (a) Otsubo, K.; Inanaga, J.; Yamaguchi, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1986, 27, 5763–5764. (b) See also: Corey, E. J.; Zheng, G. Z. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1997, 38, 2045–2048.
(6) (a) Corey, E. J.; Kang, M.-c.; Desai, M. C.; Ghosh, A. K.; Houpis,
I. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 649–651. (b) Corey, E. J.; Weinschenker,
N. M.; Schaaf, T. K.; Huber, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 5675–5677.
r
10.1021/ol400362t
XXXX American Chemical Society