N. Chandan, M. G. Moloney / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 1987–1990
1989
Figure 2. Comparison of NMR data.
1 h) in a very high yield of 92% as inseparable syn- and anti-iso-
mers. This material was directly treated with p-toluenesulfonyl
choride and base (Et3N or pyridine in dry dichloromethane at rt)
to afford the tosyl oxime 13c (87% yield). Treatment of this com-
pound with sodium hydride at reflux gave the desired ring closure
product, pyrroline 14 in a good yield of 64%, which when reduced
(NaBH3CN, MeOH, 2 M HCl in MeOH, rt) afforded 2,2,5-trisubsti-
tuted pyrrolidine 15 (96% yield) with undetermined diastereo-
meric ratio. This clearly demonstrated that the cyclisation
methodology was tolerant of additional system functionality, and
the next key goal was to establish a system in which carbonyl
group differentiation would be possible.
the chemical shift of H-7 in both 15 and 20 was about 0.2–
0.3 ppm lower than the natural product, most likely as a result of
the proximity of the anisotropic carbonyl group at C-4 of the pyr-
rolidine ring.
In conclusion, we have shown that rapid diastereoselective
elaboration of aspartate derivatives into 2,2,5-trisubstituted pyr-
rolidines is feasible in a short, reliable sequence and in good overall
yield, and work to demonstrate its applicability to the synthesis of
kaitocephalin is ongoing.
Acknowledgment
For this purpose, Weinreb malonamide 16 on conjugate addi-
N.C. gratefully acknowledges receipt of a National Overseas
Scholarship from the Indian Ministry of Social Justice and Empow-
erment (GF6-352746).
tion with
a,b-unsaturated ketone 6b and base (anhydrous K2CO3
in dry dichloromethane at rt) gave adduct 6d in 65% yield as a mix-
ture of diastereomers (Scheme 2). Since it was now clear that the
oxazolidinone ring would not be stable towards oxime formation,
it was immediately opened by treatment with 5% NaHCO3 in
MeOH, giving ketone 17a in 76% yield. This material was readily
converted into the corresponding oxime 17b using the standard
conditions (NH2OHÁHCl and Et3N in EtOH heated to reflux for
1 h) in a good yield of 86% as inseparable E and Z isomers. Oxime
17b was reacted with methanesulfonyl chloride and Et3N in dry
dichloromethane to give the mesyl oxime 17c in a very good yield
of 79% as inseparable E and Z isomers, and this was immediately
treated with NaH in dry THF at reflux for 30 min; however,
although the starting material was consumed completely as shown
by TLC and the desired cyclised pyrroline 18 could be detected in
the mass spectrum, its isolation was very difficult. Instead, conver-
sion of the oxime 17b into tosyl oxime 17d by treatment with
p-toluenesulfonyl chloride with Et3N or pyridine in dry dichloro-
methane gave the desired product in 61% yield, and immediate
treatment with NaH in dry THF afforded the desired pyrroline 18
in 49% yield with a diastereomeric ratio of approximately 1:2,
along with unexpected pyrazole 19 in 42% yield with a diastereo-
meric ratio of approximately 1:1. This latter product resulted from
ring formation by an attack of the proximal carbamate nitrogen on
the activated oxime, but both 18 and 19 were easily separated by
chromatography. Of interest is that this pyrazole formation is fully
analogous to a process previously reported by Black.38 The pyrro-
line 18 was readily converted into the 2,2,5-trisubstituted pyrroli-
dine 20 by treatment with NaBH3CN in 2 M MeOH to afford a 97%
yield with a 1:2 diastereomeric ratio (Scheme 2). Comparisons of
the chemical shifts at H-7 and H-9 of kaitocephalin (1) and the
mimics 15 and 20 are shown in Figure 2; similar chemical shift
and coupling patterns were observed in these systems, although
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
References and notes
1. Shin-ya, K.; Kim, J. S.; Furihata, K.; Hayakawa, Y.; Seto, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997,
38, 7079–7082.
2. Shin-ya, K.; Kim, J. S.; Hayakawa, Y.; Seto, H. J. Neurochem. 1999, 73, S190.
3. Kobayashi, H.; Shin-ya, K.; Furihata, K.; Hayakawa, Y.; Seto, H. Tetrahedron Lett.
2001, 42, 4021–4023.
4. Ma, D. W.; Yang, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9706–9707.
5. Okue, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Shin-ya, K.; Furihata, K.; Hayakawa, Y.; Seto, H.;
Watanabe, H.; Kitahara, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 857–860.
6. Watanabe, H.; Kitahara, T. J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn. 2007, 65, 511–519.
7. Watanabe, H.; Okue, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Kitahara, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43,
861–864.
8. Yu, S. Y.; Zhu, S. L.; Pan, X. H.; Yang, J. D.; Ma, D. W. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 1673–
1680.
9. Takahashi, K.; Yamaguchi, D.; Ishihara, J.; Hatakeyama, S. Org. Lett. 2012, 14,
1644–1647.
10. Hamada, M.; Shinada, T.; Ohfune, Y. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4664–4667.
11. Ohfune, Y.; Hamada, M.; Shinada, T. Amino Acids 2009, 37, 87.
12. Vaswani, R. G.; Chamberlin, A. R. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 1661–1681.
13. Kawasaki, M.; Shinada, T.; Hamada, M.; Ohfune, Y. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4165–
4167.
14. Vaswani, R. G.; Limon, A.; Reyes-Ruiz, J. M.; Miledi, R.; Chamberlin, A. R. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 132–135.
15. Lygo, B.; Beynon, C.; Roy, C.-E.; Wade, C. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 66, 8832–
8836.
16. Shinada, T.; Yoshida, H.; Ohfune, Y. Synthesis 2009, 3751–3756.
17. Kudryavtsev, K. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 44, 1686–1688.
18. Takahashi, K.; Haraguchi, N.; Ishihara, J.; Hatakeyama, S. Synlett 2008, 671–
674.