at different wavelengths and a Shimadzu RID 10A refractive
index detector. The following conditions allowed for baseline
separation of the mentioned nitriles and their corresponding
amides as well as any occurring side products like aldehydes:
compound 1–3 (H2O–AcN 90 : 10 (v/v)), compound 4–5, 8–
9, 10–11, 14 (H2O–AcN 20 : 80 (v/v)), compound 6 (H2O –
AcN 97.5 : 2.5 (v/v)), compound 12 (H2O – AcN 99 : 1 (v/v)),
compound 13 (H2O – MeOH 60 : 40 (v/v)), and compound 15
(H2O – MeOH 70 : 30 (v/v)). For all compounds a UV detection
wavelength of 210 nm was used, except for 2–3 (230 nm) and 12
(205 nm).
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Andreas Stolz of the Institut fu¨r
Mikrobiologie der Universita¨t Stuttgart for supplying them
with naproxennitrile and naproxenamide. Haiyan Yang of
ICES Singapore is gratefully acknowledged for rac-2-azido-3-
phenylpropionitrile and rac-2-azido-3-phenylpropionamide and
DSM for (R)-phenylglycinoamide. The authors wish to thank
Tom Moody and Rachel Agnew of Almac Sciences for
valuable advice. Financial support of the Delft Research
Center of Life Sciences and Technology (DRC-LST) and
the Dutch National Research School Combination Catalysis
Controlled by Chemical Design (NRSC-C) is also gratefully
acknowledged.
Chiral methodology. Unless stated otherwise, the compounds
were detected using a Waters 486 Tunable Absorbance Detector
at 210 nm.
The enantiomers of the amide of 4 were separated on a 250 ¥
4.6 mm Chiralcel OD column, eluent hexane–isopropanol, 80 : 20
(v/v) containing TFA (0.1%, v/v) at 0.5 mL min-1 and a column
temperature of 21 ◦C. The (S)-enantiomer eluted before (R). The
same analysis method was used for the amide of 5 ((S) elutes
before (R)) and 13 ((S) elutes before (R)). The enantiomers of the
amide of 14 were separated on the same column using heptane–
isopropanol, 90 : 10 (v/v). Although no enantiomerically pure
standard was available for this compound, extrapolation of the
previous results might indicate that the (S)-enantiomer elutes
before (R).
The enantiomers of the amide of 6 were separated using a
Nucleodex b-OH column, eluent H2O–MeOH, 90 : 10 (v/v) at
0.7 mL min-1 and a column temperature of 21 ◦C. The compounds
were detected using a Shimadzu SPD-10A VP UV-VIS detector at
a wavelength of 210 nm. (R)-mandelamide eluted from the column
after (S)-mandelamide.
The enantiomers of 7 and the enantiomers of the amide of 7 were
separated on a Daicel Chemical Industries Ltd. 4.6 ¥ 150 mm; 5
mm Crownpak CR (+) column. The eluent was aqueous HClO4,
pH 1, at a flowrate of 0.6 mL min-1. The column temperature
was 18 ◦C. In the case of both the nitrile and the amide, the (R)-
enantiomers eluted before the (S). The compounds were detected
using a Shimadzu SPD-10A VP UV-VIS detector at a wavelength
of 210 nm.
References
1 L. Martinkova and V. Kren, Biocatal. Biotransform., 2002, 20, 73–
93.
2 A. Banerjee, R. Sharma and U. C. Banerjee, Appl. Microbiol. Biotech-
nol., 2002, 60, 33–44.
3 K. Faber, Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry, 1st edn., Springer,
Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1997.
4 T. Sugai, T. Yamazaki, M. Yokoyama and H. Ohta, Biosci. Biotechnol.
Biochem., 1997, 61, 1419–1427.
5 D. L. Anton, R. D. Fallon, B. Stieglitz, V. G. Witterholt, (E. I. Du Pont
de Nemours and Company), US patent 5593871, 1997; Chem. Abstr.,
1997, 126, 156478.
6 M. S. Payne, S. J. Wu, R. D. Fallon, G. Tudor, B. Stieglitz, I. M. Turner
and M. J. Nelson, Biochemistry, 1997, 36, 5447–5454.
7 R. Bauer, Untersuchungen zur Substratspecificita¨t und Enantioselec-
tivita¨t der Nitril-Hydratase und Amidase aus Agrobacterium tumefaciens
d3, TU Stuttgart (DE), 1997.
8 R. Bauer, H. J. Knackmuss and A. Stolz, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.,
1998, 49, 89–95.
9 I. Prepachalova, L. Martinkova, A. Stolz, M. Ovesna, K. Bezouska,
J. Kopecky and V. Kren, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2001, 55, 150–
156.
10 S. Wu, R. D. Fallon and M. S. Payne, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.,
1997, 48, 704–708.
11 S. Wu, R. D. Fallon and M. S. Payne, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.,
1999, 52, 186–190.
12 L. Song, M. X. Wang, X. Yang and S. Qian, Biotechnol. J., 2007, 2,
717–724.
13 L. Y. Song, H. J. Yuan, L. Coffey, J. Doran, M. X. Wang, S. J. Qian
and C. O’Reilly, Biotechnol. Lett., 2008, 30, 755–762.
14 J. Eck, K. Liebeton, L. Fischer, M. Hensel, M. Wa¨lz, S. Lutz-Wahl, C.
Ewert, (B.R.A.I.N.), European Patent 1842907A1, 2007; Chem. Abstr.,
2007, 147, 442585.
The enantiomers of the amides of 8 and 9 were separated
on a 250 ¥ 4.6 mm Daicel ChiralPak AD-H column, eluent
hexane–isopropanol, 92 : 8 (v/v) containing TFA (0.1%, v/v) at
15 C. Ewert, S. Lutz-Wahl and L. Fischer, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2008,
◦
0.5 mL min-1 and a column temperature of 21 C. In both cases
19, 2573–2578.
16 J. L. Tucker, L. Xu, W. Yu, R. W. Scott, L. Zhao, N. Ran,
(Bioverdant, Inc.), WO 2009009117, 2009; Chem. Abstr., 2009, 150,
119828.
17 L. Song, M. Z. Wang, J. J. Shi, Z. Q. Xue, M. X. Wang and S. J. Qian,
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2007, 362, 319–324.
18 G. W. Black, T. Gregson, C. B. McPake, J. J. Perry and M. Zhang,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2010, 51, 1639–1641.
19 D. Y. Sorokin, S. van Pelt, T. P. Tourova and G. Muyzer, Appl. Environ.
Microbiol., 2007, 73, 5574–5579.
20 C. S. Chen, Y. Fujimoto, G. Girdaukas and C. J. Sih, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1982, 104, 7294–7299.
21 A. Miyanaga, S. Fushinobu, K. Ito and T. Wakagi, Biochem. Biophys.
Res. Commun., 2001, 288, 1169–1174.
22 S. Hourai, M. Miki, Y. Takashima, S. Mitsuda and K. Yanagi, Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun., 2003, 312, 340–345.
23 C. Haddow, J. J. Perry, M. Durrant and J. Faith, Int. J. Data Min.
Bioinformatics, in press.
24 K. Hashimoto, H. Suzuki, K. Taniguchi, T. Noguchi, M. Yohda and
M. Odaka, J. Biol. Chem., 2008, 283, 36617–36623.
the (R)-enantiomer elutes before (S). The same analysis method
was used for the separation of the enantiomers of the amide of
10. To determine the elution order of the (R)- and (S)-amide, a
previously described chiral GC method was used first to determine
the configuration of the remaining nitrile.27 Using this method it
was found that the (S)-amide eluted before the (R)-amide. The
enantiomers of the amides of 11 and 15 were separated on the
same column using hexane–isopropanol, 97 : 3 (v/v) containing
TFA (0.1%, v/v) for the amide of 11 and heptane–isopropanol,
85 : 15 (v/v) containing TFA (0.1%, v/v) for the amide
of 15.
The enantiomers of 12 were separated using chiral GC on a
Chiradex GTA column of 50 m ¥ 0.25 mm, df 0.12 mm with an
isothermal temperature program of 50 ◦C for 10 min and a gas
flow of 7 mL min-1. (R)-12 elutes before (S)-12.
3018 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 3011–3019
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
©