palladium-catalyzed intramolecular cyclization of aryl-
substituted alkynes possessing a hydroxyl group at the
ortho-position to the triple bond for the synthesis of 2,3-
diarylbenzofuran.17 Since then transition metal catalyzed
coupling/cyclization of suitably functionalized alkynes as
starting materials has been the focus for the synthesis of
2,3-diarylbenzofurans and 2,3-diarylnaphthofurans.18ꢀ21
A number of methods have been developed for the syn-
thesis of 2,3-diarylbenzofurans, but synthetic routes for
naphthofurans are limited11,14 and the synthesis of diver-
sified naphthofurans still presents a major challenge in
organic synthesis.
Encouraged by the illustrated biological and synthetic
interest in 1,2-diarylnaphtho[2,1-b]furans and prompted
by the recent results for metal catalyzed CꢀH activation
reactions, we envisaged a novel synthetic pathway to
2,3-diarylnaphthofurans starting from 2-naphthols (1),
aryl alkynes (2), and haloarenes (4). It was expected that
hydroarylation of 2 with 1 in the presence of Lewis acids will
generate R-hydroxy styrenes (3).22ꢀ27 Heck-oxyarylation of
3 with 4 will afford the desired 2,3-diarylnaphthofurans
(Scheme 1). We report herein a simple and efficient method
for the synthesis of 2,3-diarylnaphthofurans by sequential
hydroarylation/Heck-oxyarylation. To the best of our
knowledge, this is the first report of the synthesis of
diversified diarylnaphthofurans using sequential diarylation
reactions.
In our initial investigation, 2-naphthol (1a), phenylace-
tylene (2a), and iodobenzene (4a) were used as substrates
to form 2,3-diphenylnaphthofuran (5a) using Yb(OTf)3
as a catalyst for hydroarylation and Pd(OAc)2 for in situ
Heck-oxyarylation. This strategy was unsuccessful since
hydroarylation did not happen under these conditions.
Thus, first the reaction conditions for hydroarylation of 2a
with 1a to give 1-(1-phenylvinyl)naphthalen-2-ol (3a) were
optimized using different Lewis acid catalysts (Table 1).
Among the different metal triflates screened, Cu(OTf)2,
Sc(OTf)3, and Bi(OTf)3 afforded 3a in good to moderate
yields (30ꢀ81%, Table 1, entries 7ꢀ9). In the case of
Cu(OTf)2, the homocoupled product of 2a was also ob-
tained in 30% yield along with 3a. An excellent yield of 3a
(91%) was obtained by the use of In(OTf)3 (10 mol %)
under microwave irradiation in toluene (Table 1, entry 10).
Table 1. Optimization of Hydroarylation Conditions for 3a
mol
(%)
time
yielda
(%)
entry
catalyst
(min)
solvent
b,c
1
Yb(OTf)3
Y(OTf)3
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
5
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
20
40
20
20
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
ACN
ꢀ
2
trace
b
3
Ce(OTf)3
Ln(OTf)3
Gd(OTf)3
Zn(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Sc(OTf)3
Bi(OTf)3
In(OTf)3
In(OTf)3
In(OTf)3
In(OTf)3
In(OTf)3
ꢀ
4
trace
10
5
6
trace
30
7
8
81
9
59
10
11
12
13
14
91 (76)c
66
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of 1,2-Diarylnaphthofurans
61
10
10
79
THF
71
a Isolated yield after MW irradiation for 40 min at 120 °C. b No
product was formed. c Thermal heating under reflux conditions for 10 h.
It is noteworthy to mention that when the hydroxyl
group of naphthol was converted to methoxy and acetoxy,
hydroarylation did not occur to give the corresponding
1-substituted-R-hydroxy styrene. It is expected that the
hydroarylation reaction proceeds through the mechanism
as proposed in literature.23,28
(13) Sakiyama, N.; Noguchi, K.; Tanaka, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2012, 51, 5976–5980.
(14) Nicolaou, K. C.; Snyder, S. A.; Bigot, A.; Pfefferkorn, J. A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1093–1096.
(15) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Yang, W.; Rominger, F. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2011, 50, 5762–5765.
(16) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Yang, W.; Rominger, F. Chem.;Eur. J. 2012,
18, 6576–6580.
Following the optimized reaction conditions for the
hydroarylation, 1a and 7-methoxynaphthol (1b) were hy-
droarylated with different 4-substituted phenylacetylenes
(2aꢀc) in the presence of In(OTf)3 to give the correspond-
ing 1-substituted-R-hydroxy styrenes (3aꢀf) in high yields
(85ꢀ95%, Table 2).
(17) Arcadi, A.; Cacchi, S.; Del Rosario, M.; Fabrizi, G.; Marinelli,
F. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 9280–9288.
(18) Colobert, F.; Castanet, A.-S.; Abillard, O. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 3334–3341.
(19) Bates, C. G.; Saejueng, P.; Murphy, J. M.; Venkataraman, D.
Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4727–4729.
(20) G. Kundu, N.; Pal, M.; S. Mahanty, J.; De, M. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 2815–2820.
The structures of 3aꢀf were confirmed by NMR and
high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) (Supporting
Information). Vinylic CH2 protons for 3a resonated at δ
6.35 and 5.53 with a splitting constant of 1.5 Hz, and
the phenolic proton resonated at δ 5.61 as a singlet in the
1H NMR spectra. In the 13C NMR, a total of 16 carbons
(21) Larock, R. C.; Yum, E. K.; Doty, M. J.; Sham, K. K. C. J. Org.
Chem. 1995, 60, 3270–3271.
(22) Yamaguchi, M.; Hayashi, A.; Hirama, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 1151–1152.
(23) J S Yadav, B. V. S. R. Synthesis 2009, 1301–1304.
(24) Yamaguchi, M.; Arisawa, M.; Omata, K.; Kabuto, K.; Hirama,
M.; Uchimaru, T. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 7298–7305.
(25) Sarma, R.; Prajapati, D. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 9525–9527.
(26) Casiraghi, G.; Casnati, G.; Puglia, G.; Sartori, G.; Terenghi, G.
Synthesis 1977, 122–124.
(27) Mendoza, P. D.; Echavarren, A. M. Pure Appl. Chem. 2010, 82,
801–820.
(28) Yoon, M. Y.; Kim, J. H.; Choi, D. S.; Shin, U. S.; Lee, J. Y.;
Song, C. E. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 1725–1737.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 9, 2013
2191