2882
S. Arunkhamkaew et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 2880–2882
evaluated together with their mixtures as AChEI. The THBDC (6)
was also introduced to the Biginelli reaction with benzaldehyde
and urea to furnish the THBDC–DHPM analogue (18). As a methoxy
group in the aromatic ring of the aldehyde precursor is considered
to be essential for inhibitory activity, we therefore synthesized the
desired THBDC–DHPM analogue (19) by treatment of THBDC (6)
with 4-methoxybenzaldehyde.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
The preliminary study of the inhibitory potencies of synthesized
THC–DHPM (8) showed a low inhibitory property against AChE and
1. (a) Alzheimer’s Association Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 2012, 131.; (b) World
Health Organization. Facts and figures of Alzheimer’s disease: the brain killer,
2012.
2. (a) Delagarza, V. W. Am. Fam. Physician 2003, 1364; (b) Hamley, I. W. Chem. Rev.
2012, 112, 5147.
3. (a) Racchi, M.; Mazzucchelli, M.; Porrello, E.; Lanni, C.; Govoni, S. Pharmacol.
Res. 2004, 50, 441; (b) Francotte, P.; Graindorgea, E.; Boveriea, S.; de Tullioa, P.;
Pirottea, B. Curr. Med. Chem. 2004, 11, 1757; (c) Shinada, M.; Narumi, F.; Osada,
Y.; Matsumoto, K.; Yoshida, T.; Higuchi, K.; Kawasaki, T.; Tanaka, H.; Satoh, M.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 20, 4901; (d) Khorana, N.; Changwichit, K.;
Ingkaninan, K.; Utsintong, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 2885; (e) Meng,
F.-C.; Mao, F.; Shan, W.-J.; Qin, F.; Huang, L.; Li, X.-S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2012, 22, 4462.
in the same range IC50 value of 36.33 0.50
the corresponding THC (IC50 = 41.16 0.17
l
M when compared to
lM) (Table 2). From this
result, it was realized that the DHPM unit in the molecule essen-
tially enhances the activity. However, with low inhibitory values,
the 3- and 4-nitro phenyl THC–DHPM analogues (9 and 10) showed
that the nitro group may have negative effect on the binding ability
with the enzyme. Other THC–DHPM analogues (11 and 12) contain-
ing 4-OH or 4-OCH3 phenyl group displayed better results with low
inhibitory activities and with IC50 value of 17.31 0.17
lM and
4. Davis, K. L.; Powchick, P. Lancet 1995, 345, 625.
14.28 0.09 M, respectively, (entries 4 and 5). However, the intro-
l
5. (a) Kawagami, Y.; Inoue, A.; Kawai, T.; Wakita, M.; Sugimoto, H.; Hopfinger, A. J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 4, 1429; (b) Barner, E. L.; Gray, S. L. Ann.
Pharmacother. 1998, 32, 70.
6. (a) Weinstock, M.; Rasin, M.; Chorev, M.; Enz, A. J. Neural Transm. Suppl. 1994,
43, 219; (b) Spencer, C. M.; Noble, S. Drugs Aging 1998, 13, 391.
7. Marco-Contelles, J.; do Carmo Carreiras, M.; Rodríguez, C.; Villarroya, M.;
García, A. G. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 116.
8. (a) Maheshwari, R. K.; Singh, A. K.; Gaddipati, J.; Srimal, R. Life Sci. 2006, 78,
2081; (b) Goel, A.; Kunnumakkara, A. B.; Aggarwal, B. B. Biochem. Pharmacol.
2008, 75, 787.
9. (a) Park, S.-Y.; Kim, D. S. H. L. J. Nat. Prod. 2002, 65, 1227; (b) Ahmed, T.; Gilani,
A.-H. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2009, 91, 554; (c) Ray, B.; Lahiri, D. K. Curr.
Opin. Pharmacol. 2009, 9, 434; (d) Hamaguchi, T.; Ono, K.; Yamada, M. CNS
Neurosci. Ther. 2010, 16, 285; (e) Chen, S.-Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.-P.; Chen, S.-H.; Tan,
J.-H.; Ou, T.-M.; Gu, L.-Q.; Huang, Z.-S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 5596.
10. Weber, W. M.; Hunsaker, L. A.; Abcouwer, S. F.; Deck, L. M.; Vander Jagt, D. L.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 3811.
11. Hoehle, S. I.; Pfeiffer, E.; Sólyom, A. M.; Metzler, M. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54,
756.
12. Ellman, L. G.; Courtney, K. D.; Andres, V., Jr.; Featherstone, M. R. Biochem.
Pharmacol. 1961, 2, 88.
13. Tomassoli, I.; Ismaili, L.; Pudlo, M.; de los Ríos, C.; Soriano, E.; Colmena, I.;
Gandía, L.; Rivas, L.; Samadi, A.; Marco-Contelles, J.; Refouvelet, B. Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 2011, 46, 1.
duction of one more electron donating group in the aromatic moi-
ety did not increase the activities against AChE, as 2,4-OCH3-, 2,5-
OCH3- and 3-OCH3-4-OH-phenyl THC–DHPMs (13À15) exhibited
poor inhibitory activities. A mixture isomers of THDC–DHPM ana-
logue (17) bearing a 4-OCH3 phenyl group demonstrated much bet-
ter activity with an IC50 value of 2.89 0.10
DHPM (16) without the 4-OCH3 phenyl group (5.36 0.20
well as in the case of both THBDC–DHPMs (18 and 19), IC50 value
of 2.04 0.11 M and 1.34 0.03 M were obtained from the com-
lM than that of THDC-
lM), as
l
l
pound without 4-OCH3 phenyl group and with 4-OCH3 phenyl
group, respectively. However, the individual regioisomers 16a and
16b, 17a and 17b were less active than their respective mixture
16 and 17. This was probably due to the synergistic effect of the
regioisomers in the mixture. From the screening test of AChEIs,
the methoxy substituent on the phenyl group originated from alde-
hyde and an absence of methoxy group on curcuminoid component
seem to be crucially important for the inhibitory activity of these
compounds.
14. (a) Bahekar, S. S.; Shinde, D. B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 1733; (b) Holla,
B. S.; Sooryanarayana Rao, B.; Sarojini, B. K.; Akberali, P. M. Eur. J. Med. Chem.
2004, 39, 777; (c) Zorkun, I. S.; Saraç, S.; Çelebib, S.; Erol, K. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2006, 14, 8582; (d) Stefani, H. A.; Oliveira, C. B.; Almeida, R. B.; Pereira, C. M. P.;
Braga, R. C.; Cella, R.; Borges, V. C.; Savegnago, L.; Nogueira, C. W. Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 2006, 41, 513; (e) Ashok, M.; Holla, B. S.; Kumari, N. S. Eur. J. Med. Chem.
2007, 42, 380.
15. (a) Lal, J.; Gupta, S. K.; Agarwal, D. D. Catal. Commun. 2012, 27, 38; (b) Lal, J.;
Gupta, S. K.; Thavaselvam, D.; Agarwal, D. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22,
2872; (c) Sahu, P. K.; Sahu, P. K.; Gupta, S. K.; Thavaselvam, D.; Agarwal, D. D.
Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 54, 366.
In conclusion, THC-, THDC- and THBDC–DHPM analogues were
synthesized and evaluated as inhibitors of AChE. The inhibitory
potencies of the synthesized compounds against the AChE unveiled
that THBDC–DHPM (19) bearing a 4-OCH3 phenyl group has a
highly effective inhibitory activity of AChE18 with an excellent
IC50 value of 1.34 0.03
that of galanthamine.
lM, which is slightly more potent than
Acknowledgments
16. Kappe, C. O. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 6937.
17. (a) Kumar, K. A.; Kasthuraiah, M.; Reddy, C. S.; Reddy, C. D. Tetrahedron Lett.
2001, 42, 7873; (b) Maiti, G.; Kundu, P.; Guin, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
2757; (c) Shaabani, A.; Bazgir, A.; Teimouri, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 857;
(d) Gohain, M.; Prajapati, D.; Sandhu, J. S. Synlett 2004, 235; (e) Su, W.; Li, J.;
Zheng, Z.; Shen, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 6037; (f) Manhas, M. S.; Ganguly,
S. N.; Mukherjee, S.; Jain, A. K.; Bose, A. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 2423.
18. Bartolini, M.; Pistolozzi, M.; Andrisano, V.; Egea, J.; López, M. G.; Iriepa, I.;
Moraleda, I.; Gálvez, E.; Marco-Contelles, J.; Samadi, A. Chem. Med. Chem. 2011,
6, 1990.
This work was supported by the Center of Excellence for Inno-
vation in Chemistry (PERCH-CIC), The Thailand Research Fund
and the Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Ramkhamha-
eng University. We would also like to acknowledge the Depart-
ment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University
for HPLC separation.